Selection of fungal biocontrol agents for their potential control of Fusarium internal fruit rot in greenhouse bell pepper
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
An internal fruit rot disease of sweet peppers, first reported in Canada in 2000, later emerged as a significant disease of greenhouse-grown bell pepper worldwide. It is caused primarily by members of the Fusarium lactis species complex (FLASC) and to a lesser extent by Fusarium oxysporum and Fusarium proliferatum. The infection starts via the flowers. After the initial infection, the fungus stays latent inside the fruit until maturity. During ripening, the fungus can start to proliferate on the inside of the fruit as mycelium on the ovary and/or cause necrosis. Later, sunken lesions appear on the outside of the fruit. Nearly all growers are confronted with this problem to some extent, with an average annual yield loss estimated at 5% and seasonal peaks up to 20%. Despite the importance of the disease, particularly during years with high disease incidence, efficient control is lacking. Despite the availability of chemical products against Fusarium, application of these products is not recommended as most of the diseases and pests on Belgian greenhouse bell peppers can be controlled with biocontrol agents (BCAs), generating a desired reputation of vegetable production with a low environmental impact. Furthermore, pepper flower production is irregular, which would require daily application of antifungal products during periods of flowering. Hence, the development of a biocontrol agent applied with the pollinator-vector technology has potential for effectively controlling this disease. The first screening of BCA candidates was through dual culture tests to evaluate their inhibitory and mycoparasitic abilities. Seven BCAs were selected and tested further in 2013 under conventional greenhouse conditions. First, one-day-old flowers were separately inoculated with a BCA. One day later they were inoculated with FLASC. The infection incidence in two-week-old fruits and mature fruits was determined using surface disinfection and plating techniques. Two BCA isolates (one commercially available and one KU Leuven isolate) reduced the number of infected fruits by 50%. These studies showed that BCAs have the potential to contribute to the control of Fusarium internal fruit rot. Currently we are testing the best BCAs in combination with the pollinator-vectoring technology. Acknowledgements: Flanders Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology (IWT)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».