Upper Extremity Disability Is Associated With Grip Strength and Psychological Stress in Carpal Tunnel Syndrome According to a Patient-reported Questionnaire
Pourquoi ce travail est dans la base
Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Objective: We investigated which clinical factors influenced upper extremity disability in carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS). Materials and Methods: We analyzed 45 hands with CTS of patients enrolled in a prospective cohort study conducted from December 2012 to January 2015. The age among the participant group of 40 females and 5 males ranged from 30 to 86 (mean, 60.3 years). Forty-three patients were right-handed. Twenty-seven had bilateral CTS (36 hands). Operations were performed on 25 right and 20 left hands. Thirty-nine hands were classified as “Extreme CTS” (absence of median motor and sensory responses) according to the severity scale proposed by Padua. Hand10 was used as a validated upper-extremity disability assessment tool. Clinical assessments were comprised of patients’ characteristic, physical and psychological parameters. Patients’ characteristic consisted of age, body mass index, and duration of symptom. Physical parameters included grip strength, key pinch strength, pulp pinch strength, Semmes Weinstein Monofilament Test, static 2 point discrimination test (s2PD test), numerical rating scale for numbness, visual analogue scale for pain (pain VAS), and Japanese version of Short-Form McGill Pain Questionnaire (SF-MPQ). Psychological parameters included Japanese version of Self-rating Depression Scale, Japanese version of Pain Anxiety Symptom Scale–20 (PASS-20), and Stress Response Scale–18 (SRS-18). These assessments were conducted on the day before operation. Statistical Analysis: Factors that were significantly associated with Hand10 scores in bivariate analysis (Pearson correlation test or Spearman rank correlation test as appropriate) were entered into a multivariable analysis. A multiple regression analysis was used to identify factors that were independently associated with Hand10 scores. Results: Hand10 scores showed no statistical differences in terms of unilateral/bilateral CTS and sex differences. Single regression analysis showed that Hand10 scores correlated significantly with the pain VAS, SF-MPQ, PASS-20, SRS-18, s2PD at index and middle scores, and grip strength. Multiple regression analysis showed that grip strength ( B = 1.47, β = 0.49, P = .00) and SRS-18 score ( B = −0.91, β = −0.36, P = .02) were significant correlation factors for the Hand10 score ( R 2 = 0.49). Conclusions: In patients with CTS, grip strength and psychological stress are significant correlating factors of disability according to a patient-administered upper extremity assessment.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle