Rituximab Based Regimen May Decrease the Incidence of CNS Relapse in Patients with Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 4770 BACKGROUND Relapse in the central nervous system (CNS) following initial treatment of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is an uncommon but fatal complication. However, the addition of rituximab improves the clinical outcome dramatically in DLBCL patients; its influence on CNS relapse is unproven. Aim This single centre retrospective study was conducted to investigate the incidence of CNS relapse, and to evaluate the impact of adding rituximab to standard CHOP (RCHOP) regimen without CNS prophylaxis in patients at risk of CNS relapse. PATIENTS AND METHODS All patients with DLBCL diagnosed from April 2002 to December 2007 at sunnybrook cancer center were retrospectively identified in the Cancer Database. Patients were included if they were >16 years old, had advanced stage (stage III /IV, or stage I /II with B symptoms, elevated LDH or bulky disease, were treated with RCHOP regimen with curative intent and were free of CNS involvement at diagnosis. CNS relapse was diagnosed by CSF cytology, radiology or clinically. Results A total of 155 patients were newly diagnosed with DLBCL and treated with RCHOP only. 22 pts were excluded, 20 had CNS prophylaxis and 2 pts had CNS involvement. 133 pts were eligible (69 male and 64 female) Median age was 64 (Age'60 was 59.4%). Stage III/IV was 69.9%. LDH was elevated in 59.4%. Bone marrow (BM) involvement and Extra nodal “>2 were 18.05% and 25.6% respectively. EN sites were: (liver 4.5%, Bone 6.8%, Pulmonary 4.5%, kidney 3.01%, cardiac 1.5%, intestine 2.3%, testicular 1.5%). The International Prognostic Index was high-intermediate/high in 55.6%. Pathologically transformed was 12.03% and were transformed from indolent histologies. BCL2 was positive in 65.4%, BCL6 was 48.9%, CD10 was positive in 49.6%, Ki-67 was >80% in 25%. All patients received RCHOP (Median 6 cycles, (range 2-8). Overall response (ORR) was 88.6%, CR/CRU 72.7% with a median follow up 24.6 months (range 2.6-75.5). 28 patients (21.05%) relapsed systemically. Two patients (1.5%) had a CNS relapse 1 brain parenchyma and 1 leptomeningeal one month after systemic relapse. The median time to CNS relapse was 10.4 mos (6.24-14.5 mos). In univariate risk factor analysis (LDH (p=0.8), IPI>3 (p=0.9), No of EN (p=0.9). Actuarial 5 y Overall Survival (OS) was 67.3% (95% CI (57-77%) and progression free Survival (PFS) was 65.7% (95% CI (52.3-78.6%). Conclusion Our data suggest that the addition of rituximab may reduce the risk of CNS relapse for poor risk patients likely through systemic control. Future prospective studies of rituximab-containing chemotherapies with CNS prophylaxis are warranted Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».