Sperm Chromatin Fragmentation Occurs at Specific Chromatin Sites.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
We previously demonstrated that when treated with divalent cations mouse epididymal spermatozoa fragment their DNA by inducing Topoisomerase 2B (TOP2B) to create double strand breaks at 25 kb to 50 kb intervals that can be reversed with EDTA. We term this sperm chromatin fragmentation (SCF). Our evidence supports a model that these DNA breaks occur at the sites of attachment of DNA loop domains to the sperm nuclear matrix. This model implies that the break points caused by TOP2B occur at specific sites in the chromatin. We tested this model using genome-wide DNA sequencing of the break points then verifying the specificity of individual break points using PCR. Epididymal spermatozoa were isolated and embedded in low-melting agarose plugs in a buffer containing 0.25% Triton X-100. The plugs were then treated with 10 mM MnCl2 and 10 mM CaCl2 for 1 hr at 37°C, then either placed directly in a digestion buffer containing 0.5% SDS, or incubated further with 50 mM EDTA for 30 min and then placed in a digestion buffer. The sperm DNA was then separated on agarose gels by field inversion gel electrophoresis. Spermatozoa treated with divalent cations fragmented their DNA to 25 kb to 50 kb sizes (SCF-DNA), but those that were subsequently treated with EDTA repaired the double strand breaks and their DNA remained near the top of the gel (SCFrev-DNA) similarly to control DNA from untreated spermatozoa. Sperm DNA was extracted from gel slices from control, divalent cation treated, and cation then EDTA treated samples. SCF-DNA was isolated and end labeled with biotin. The DNA was then fragmented further to much smaller sizes and biotin labeled fragments were isolated with antibodies to biotin using a method called "dDIP" for DNA damage immunoprecipitation. These fragments were sequenced using high throughput analysis, and mapped in the mouse genome. PCR primers were then developed that spanned the break points of the most frequently identified sequences. Control primers were designed to amplify similar sized fragments adjacent to the break points that would not be expected to be cleaved by SCF. These primers were used to test for the presence of the fragments in control DNA, SCF-DNA and SCFrev-DNA. The genome wide sequencing of SCF-DNA identified 3,004 possible break points. Of these, 43.1% (1,296) were identified more than 10 times, and 21.9% (657) were identified more than 100 times. We then focused on two sites that were identified more than 10,000 times, one on chromosome 9 and the other on chromosome 15. We amplified genomic DNA fragments of similar sizes that both crossed the putative break points, and were adjacent to them. In control DNA, both fragments were present. In SCF-DNA, only the regions adjacent to the break point could be amplified. In SCFrev-DNA, both fragments could be amplified, indicating that the break point was repaired correctly. SCF is a controlled breakage of the entire sperm chromatin to small fragments, but the cleavage sites are at specific points. These data support our model that SCF is the result of TOB2B induced double strand DNA breaks at specific sequences, probably at the sites of DNA attachment to the sperm nuclear matrix. They also indicate that the very condensed sperm chromatin retains enough enzymatic machinery to respond to its environment, which may also contribute to normal embryogenesis. This research was supported in part by NIH grants HD060722 (WSW) and HD36512 (SAK). (platform)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».