MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2530517561 · doi:10.1093/eurpub/ckw194

The Vienna Declaration on Public Health

2016· editorial· en· W2530517561 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Martin McKee, David Stückler, Dineke Zeegers Paget, Thomas E. Dorner

Notice bibliographique

RevueEuropean Journal of Public Health · 2016
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineBusiness, Management and Accounting
ThématiqueGlobal Public Health Policies and Epidemiology
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCharterHealth promotionPublic healthPolitical scienceDeclarationGlobal healthHealth policyInternational healthEmpowermentPublic relationsPublic administrationMedicineNursingLaw

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

In 1986 participants at the First International Conference on Health Promotion agreed the landmark Ottawa Charter. The Charter was a powerful response to calls for a new public health movement, setting out a vision and framework for actions to achieve the World Health Organization’s ‘Health for All’ targets by the year 2000 and beyond. It provided the foundation for many subsequent developments, including health in all policies, action on the built environment, community action and empowerment, an emphasis on prevention, and a focus on health equity. Today the principles of the Ottawa Charter remain as important as ever. Yet the world in 2016 is very different from that in 1986, and so too have the risks and opportunities for public health. In recognition of these changes, and taking account of other developments such as the 2016 World Federation of Public Health Association’s Global Charter on the Public’s Health,1 the European Public Health Association and its partners have examined how the principles set out in the Ottawa Charter apply to these new circumstances. The resulting Vienna Declaration (online supplement) has been adopted at the 2016 European Public Conference in Vienna, Austria. The changing context that the Vienna Declaration responds to is due, in large part, to what is termed ‘globalisation’, involving the movement of people, goods, money, and ideas over ever greater distances on a dramatic scale. This has brought many opportunities. Economic development, technological progress, especially in relation to health care, and the widespread adoption of healthy, evidence-based public policies have together contributed to large reductions in the global burden of disease, itself vastly better understood than in 1986 as a result of global collaboration, with concomitant increases in life expectancy.2 Yet globalisation has also brought new challenges to health. Thus, the damage we are doing to our planet is now indisputable, with the most recent data suggesting that man-made climate change may be reaching a point of no return. Natural resources are exploited with little concern for the environmental damage caused or how conflicts over water, oil, diamonds and other commodities hinder societal development.3 In the years since the Ottawa Charter, advanced industrialised nations have placed excessive focus on the pursuit of free market principles with insufficient attention given to health and societal well-being or investment in public goods. As a result, wealth and power is increasingly concentrated in the hands of ever fewer individuals and transnational corporations. These policies have had far reaching effects worldwide,4 reinforced by the policies adopted by global financial institutions.5 Labour regimes are driving down wages and working conditions of those in rich countries while migration depletes essential human resources from poor countries. Widening financial, educational and health inequalities, within and among countries, threaten peace and social cohesion. This situation is now unsustainable. Humanity faces a number of existential threats, many of them interconnected. Global temperatures fuelled by man-made climate change continue to break records, contributing to droughts, famines, floods and other natural disasters. Unprecedented numbers of people are on the move,6 some within countries as part of an accelerating process of urbanisation or, in some cases, because they have been displaced by conflict, but with many now moving to other countries, fleeing poverty, exploitation, and war, in some cases as a result of climate-change induced disasters. Increased movement of goods and people, coupled with inadequate systems of governance, have facilitated the emergence and spread of new infectious diseases, including antimicrobial resistance. The proliferation of weapons, whether in the hands of those determined to uphold a right to bear arms, extremist groups seeking to impose their religion or ideology by force, or the acquisition of nuclear weapons by unstable regimes have all made the world a much less safe place. The asymmetry of power between global forces and powerful individuals on the one hand and local communities renders the call, in the Ottawa Charter, for ‘empowerment of communities - their ownership and control of their own endeavours and destinies’ no more than an aspiration that, for many, seems further out of reach than ever. It is this challenge that the Vienna Declaration seeks to address. The Vienna Declaration sees information as a means to give voice to the weak and to make the invisible visible. It argues that no-one should be born, live or die without it being recorded, but also that information systems should support and not undermine human rights and measures to reduce inequalities. It places a duty on the public health community to advocate for change, engaging with many stakeholders, working with those who support public health but exposing and confronting the tactics of those who oppose it. It promotes good governance, including mechanisms to hold governments and others to account for their obligations to improve health. And it highlights the need to build capacity, including researchers, practitioners, and information systems, that can make this happen. Key points The 1986 Ottawa Charter has proven a solid basis for 3 decades of health promotion The 2016 Vienna Declaration takes its principles forward in the context of a changing world

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,020
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,049
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,028
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,105

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0200,049
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0020,002
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,014
Communication savante0,0170,010
Science ouverte0,0040,009
Intégrité de la recherche0,0280,047
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0110,012

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,108
Tête enseignante GPT0,344
Écart entre enseignants0,236 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations20
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEuropean Journal of Public HealthMême sujetGlobal Public Health Policies and EpidemiologyTravaux en français237 207