MétaCan
← tous les travaux

Visualization of dominant stress-transfer mechanisms in experimental debris flows of different particle-size distribution

2016· article· en· 48 citations· W2531281089 sur OpenAlex· 10.1139/cgj-2015-0532

Pourquoi ce travail est-il dans la base ?

Une base qui oublie comment elle a trouvé un travail ne peut pas être vérifiée. Voici les voies qui ont admis celui-ci.

Revue canadienneIl a paru dans une revue canadienne.

Aucune affiliation canadienne. Une base fondée sur la seule affiliation (le devis habituel) n'aurait jamais vu ce travail. C'est l'un des travaux qui justifient l'inversion de la base.

Le tri à trois modèles

les 1 000 travaux triés →

Les trois modèles l'ont jugé hors champ.

strate : venue_new · poids de sondage : 2684.25 (l'échantillon est stratifié ; tout taux calculé sans le poids est faux)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

Physical modeling of stress transfer in experimental debris flows.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

This experimentally studies stress transfer mechanisms in debris flows, not research practice.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre : empirical
porte sur le Canada: non
confiance: high

Physical modelling of debris-flow stress transfer; geotechnical domain science.

Résumé

Physical modelling of debris flow in a small-scale flume has been carried out to investigate the internal stress-transfer mechanisms within unsteady, saturated, and segregating granular free-surface flows. Measurements of the internal velocity fields within model flows were obtained via planar laser–induced fluorescence and particle image velocimetry. Normalized velocity profiles taken at a section over the flow duration were found to essentially collapse onto a single curve, the shape of which was dependent on the particle-size distribution. While all flows exhibited internal basal slip and shear, for tests on well-graded materials that are most representative of debris flows, the shear rate was found to reduce towards the surface to near-zero, exhibiting near plug-flow. Dimensional analysis shows that particles of different size within these flows experienced different dominant stress-transfer mechanisms — frictional, collisional or viscous. Rapid grain-size segregation therefore is both due to and results in different modes of stress transfer within a single flow. This means that in a segregating and hence, stratified system, different flow regimes will act concurrently at microscale and mesoscale. Results highlight the complexity of debris flows, so that it may be undesirable to ascribe a single microscale constitutive behaviour throughout, and further calls into question the concept of flow regimes for debris flows based on bulk measurements.

Conservé avec la notice de tri, où il sert de preuve aux étiquettes ci-dessus.

La notice

Revue
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Thématique
Landslides and related hazards
Domaine
Environmental Science
Établissements canadiens
Organismes subventionnaires
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Mots-clés
Microscale chemistryMechanicsFlumeDebris flowParticle image velocimetryGeotechnical engineeringMesoscale meteorologyMaterials scienceDebrisGeologyShear stressFlow (mathematics)PhysicsMathematics
Résumé présent dans OpenAlex
oui