MétaCan
← all works

Visualization of dominant stress-transfer mechanisms in experimental debris flows of different particle-size distribution

2016· article· en· 48 citations· W2531281089 on OpenAlex· 10.1139/cgj-2015-0532

Why is this work in the frame?

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

Canadian venueIt was published in a Canadian venue.

No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame — the usual design — would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

The three-model screen

all 1,000 screened works →

All three models called this out of scope.

stratum: venue_new · design weight: 2684.25 (the sample is stratified; any rate computed without the weight is wrong)
Claude Opus 4.8OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Physical modeling of stress transfer in experimental debris flows.

GPT-5.6 (high)OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

This experimentally studies stress transfer mechanisms in debris flows, not research practice.

Grok 4.5OUT
genre: empirical
about Canada: no
confidence: high

Physical modelling of debris-flow stress transfer; geotechnical domain science.

Abstract

Physical modelling of debris flow in a small-scale flume has been carried out to investigate the internal stress-transfer mechanisms within unsteady, saturated, and segregating granular free-surface flows. Measurements of the internal velocity fields within model flows were obtained via planar laser–induced fluorescence and particle image velocimetry. Normalized velocity profiles taken at a section over the flow duration were found to essentially collapse onto a single curve, the shape of which was dependent on the particle-size distribution. While all flows exhibited internal basal slip and shear, for tests on well-graded materials that are most representative of debris flows, the shear rate was found to reduce towards the surface to near-zero, exhibiting near plug-flow. Dimensional analysis shows that particles of different size within these flows experienced different dominant stress-transfer mechanisms — frictional, collisional or viscous. Rapid grain-size segregation therefore is both due to and results in different modes of stress transfer within a single flow. This means that in a segregating and hence, stratified system, different flow regimes will act concurrently at microscale and mesoscale. Results highlight the complexity of debris flows, so that it may be undesirable to ascribe a single microscale constitutive behaviour throughout, and further calls into question the concept of flow regimes for debris flows based on bulk measurements.

Stored with the screening record, where it is evidence for the labels above.

The record

Venue
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
Topic
Landslides and related hazards
Field
Environmental Science
Canadian institutions
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
Keywords
Microscale chemistryMechanicsFlumeDebris flowParticle image velocimetryGeotechnical engineeringMesoscale meteorologyMaterials scienceDebrisGeologyShear stressFlow (mathematics)PhysicsMathematics
Has abstract in OpenAlex
yes