MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2531624468 · doi:10.82308/51248

Building small houses in postwar Canada: Architects, homeowners and bureaucratic ideals, 1947-1974

2013· article· en· W2531624468 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ioana Teodorescu

Notice bibliographique

RevueOpen MIND · 2013
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésCorporationBureaucracyModernism (music)Public administrationAdministration (probate law)Architectural planArchitectureSociologyLawPolitical sciencePoliticsHistoryArchaeologyArt history

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

The Canadian urban landscape is filled with single-detached houses built in the post-World War II period. Whether one-storey, one-and-a-half-storey, two-storey or split-level, they were built by families across the country from efficient plans featuring minimal square footage. Many plans were designed by Canadian architects and included in catalogues published by the Central (now Canada) Mortgage and Housing Corporation (CMHC) during the first two decades after the Second World War. In setting up a Small House Design Scheme for the particular purpose of urbanizing communities smaller than those in the big cities, the corporation acted as mediator between architects and homeowners who could not afford professional services. This endeavour was inscribed in a larger effort made by CMHC to educate Canadian homeowners and builders in architectural matters. This dissertation argues that the postwar houses, despite their small size, are a major arena for the expression of modernism defined as it were by ideals of an egalitarian democracy and by scientific rationalism embraced by Canadian leaders at the time and projected unto the Canadian society. In this respect, the CMHC catalogues were vehicles to educate and convince ordinary Canadians of the values of modernism. While these plan books are the principal primary sources in this study, a rich collection of written documents and architectural drawings, as well as numerous oral histories collected from CMHC employees, architects and homeowners complete the picture. CMHC followed the model of the United States Federal Housing Administration, yet architects working for the corporation brought in distinctly British architectural and urban planning ideals. American and British models thus highly influenced the views which CMHC imposed on Canadians and which were underlined by concepts such as those of 'modern space' and 'modern family'. In looking at prescribed models for family ideals in the era and by means of interviews with people who purchased postwar houses (and/or their children), this study addresses how the transformations which occurred in the house plan are connected with social changes in postwar Canada. In terms of the architectural models which were circulated in the postwar years, this study looks at the roles of federal and provincial agencies, as well as professionals like architects and builders. It systematically explores the designs in the CMHC catalogues to uncover when and why changes occurred in the postwar house plan; it engages the role of the media - such as popular magazines, television shows and film documentaries – as a milieu liaising between the ideals and realities of the era in promoting modern life-styles based on traditional values. Lastly, it considers the opinions of the original inhabitants in an attempt to locate the intersection of real and ideal lives within these houses. With its focus on Canadian sources, this analysis is inscribed in a larger assessment of the North American architectural profession, postwar material culture and house design. It provides critical points to understand the impact of federal mandates such as CMHC's Small House Design Scheme in Canadian society beyond the immediate scope of this project, as houses built in Canada today are directly derived from the trail of thought and implementation of this Scheme.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Qualitatif · Signal consensuel: Qualitatif
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,186
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,944

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,004
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0220,006
Communication savante0,0040,001
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0070,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,026
Tête enseignante GPT0,260
Écart entre enseignants0,234 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeQualitatif
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2013
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueOpen MINDMême sujetCanadian Identity and HistoryTravaux en français237 207