MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2531688258 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.3855.3855

Transcriptome Analysis Reveals That G Protein-Coupled Receptors Are Potential Diagnostic Markers or Therapeutic Targets in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

2015· article· en· W2531688258 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Arhamatoulaye Maïga, Sébastien Lemieux, Caroline Pabst, Vincent‐Philippe Lavallée, Michel Bouvier, Guy Sauvageau, Josée Hébert

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueChemokine receptors and signaling
Établissements canadiensHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontUniversité de MontréalInstitute for Research in Immunology and Cancer
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésG protein-coupled receptorBiologyReceptorMyeloid leukemiaAngiogenesisCancer researchMyeloidLeukemiaChemokine receptorChemokineCell biologyPharmacologyImmunologyBiochemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is associated with poor overall survival and the development of more effective therapies is urgently needed. G Protein-Coupled Receptors (GPCRs) represent the largest family of membrane receptors, with an estimated 800 members in humans, and are attractive therapeutic targets, accounting for approximately 30% of targets of marketed drugs. These receptors are key transducers that bind a vast diversity of ligands (e.g. glycoproteins, peptides, amino acids, nucleotides, nucleosides, ions) allowing the cells to adapt to their environment by regulating a wide variety of physiological processes including the control of blood pressure, heart rate, digestive processes, hormone secretion, cell growth and migration, as well as vision and olfaction. Binding to their ligands leads to conformational rearrangements promoting the engagement and modulation of many distinct downstream signaling effectors that are both G protein-dependent and independent. Several GPCRs are critical for cell proliferation and survival, and can be aberrantly expressed in cancer cells. For example, the chemokine receptor CXCR4 plays an important role in metastasis and angiogenesis in breast cancer and many other types of tumors. In AML, CXCR4 overexpression has been associated with poor outcome. Moreover, in vivo mouse studies have shown that the use of a small molecule antagonist of CXCR4 increases the mobilization of AML cells into the peripheral blood and improves the apoptotic effects of chemotherapy. This activity has been explored in a phase I/II clinical study showing that the addition of CXCR4 antagonists to chemotherapy in AML might improve the remission rate. The role of GPCRs in mouse leukemogenesis has also been suggested in a transcriptome analysis of two related leukemia clones that differ in their stem cell frequency. In this study, GPCRs were the most differentially expressed class of genes between the two clones. Currently, an extensive assessment of GPCR expression in human AML is lacking. To address this issue, we studied the expression of GPCRs in a large cohort of AML samples, as well as in normal blood cells, bone marrow cell populations, and cord blood-derived CD34+ cells as controls.The 772 GPCRs analyzed in this study consist of all the GPCR members included in the International Union of Basic and Clinical Pharmacology (IUPHAR) database, as well as 370 olfactory, 24 taste and 4 vomeronasal receptors. RNA sequencing data analysis was performed as previously described (Lavallée et al, Blood 2015 Jan 1;125(1):140-3) and revealed that 240 GPCRs are expressed in cells from this AML cohort. Among these receptors, 30 are upregulated and 19 are downregulated in AML samples compared to CD34+ normal cells. Upregulated GPCRs are enriched in chemokine (CCR1, CXCR4, CCR2, CX3CR1, CCR7, and CCRL2), adhesion (CD97, EMR1, EMR2, and GPR114) and purine (including P2RY2 and P2RY13) receptor sub-families. The downregulated members include adhesion GPCRs such as LPHN1, GPR125, GPR56, CELSR3, and GPR126, protease-activated receptors (F2R and F2RL1), and the Frizzled family receptors SMO and FZD6. Interestingly, specific deregulation was observed in genetically distinct subgroups of AML, a subset of GPCRs being differentially expressed in normal karyotype AML with NPM1 or FLT3 -ITD mutations, and in specimens with Core Binding Factor and MLL rearrangements, thereby representing promising therapeutic targets or diagnostic markers. In conclusion, our results demonstrate that several GPCR members are deregulated in AML with a clear enrichment in distinct classes, providing the rationale for functional assays using available agonists or antagonists to leukemia-enriched GPCRs. Since these receptors are the targets of several US Federal and Drug Administration approved drugs, our results pave the way to explore selected GPCRs as novel AML therapeutic targets. Disclosures Bouvier: American Society of Nephrology: Other: speaker; Domain Therapeutics: Other: Company SAB member, Research Funding; Vertex Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Ontario Genomic Institute: Other: SAB meeting; BMS: Research Funding; DalCor Pharmaceutics: Other: Company SAB member; Pfizer: Other: Speaker, Research Funding; Novo-Nordisc: Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,007

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,021
Tête enseignante GPT0,257
Écart entre enseignants0,235 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2015
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetChemokine receptors and signalingTravaux en français237 207