Conference introduction and peer-review acknowledgments
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The World Federation of Chiropractic and the Association of Chiropractic Colleges have hosted a biennial joint education conference for many years; however, this was the first year that the proceedings were published in a peer-reviewed journal. The Journal of Chiropractic Education was delighted to sponsor the meeting by donating the work necessary to edit the proceedings for publication and postproduction indexing, thereby making these proceedings available in indexing systems searched by academics at universities worldwide, including PubMed, Thomson Reuters' Emerging Sources Citation Index, the Index to Chiropractic Literature, the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, the Allied and Complementary Medicine Database, and MANTIS. Brighthall, Inc., managed the call for papers, submissions, and administration of the peer-review process.The conference organizers recognized the international development of chiropractic training programs and the value of interactive formats and agreed to provide 3 different types of presentations for researchers to submit their work for peer review: platform presentation, poster presentation, and innovation panels. While most academics are familiar with platform and poster presentations, the innovations panels were designed to stimulate dialog and discovery among the participants where presentations were arranged by common topic. Following a set of 5-minute oral presentations, the floor was opened for sharing of ideas and moderated by a leader in chiropractic education. It is hoped that this new format encouraged vigorous discussion and promoted greater collaboration among participants.The call for papers was distributed in March 2016 and submissions were due June 1, 2016. All submissions were peer reviewed within a month by 33 independent reviewers from nearly every chiropractic training program around the world, represented by reviewers from 14 different countries. The peer-review committee is commended for exemplary work performed over a very short time. The peer reviewers included: Hasan Kerem Alptekin, MD, Bahçesehir Üniversity, Turkey; Fernando R.M. Azevedo, DC, Universidade Anhembi Morumbi, Brazil; David Byfield, DC, MPhil, Welsh Institute of Chiropractic, United Kingdom; Ashley Cleveland, MA, DC, Parker University, United States; Barry Draper, DC, PhD, RMIT University, Australia; Mark Feldman, DC, Central Queensland University, Australia; Ricardo Fujikawa, MD, DC, Real Centro Univeristario Escorial Maria Cristina, Spain; Rosemary Giuriato, DC, DO, Macquarie University, Australia; Julie-Marthe Grenier, DC, Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières, Canada; Dominic Giuliano, DC, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Canada; Chris Hodgetts, BSC(Chiro), Murdoch University, Australia; Kelly Holt BSc(Chiro), PhD, New Zealand College of Chiropractic, New Zealand; Barry Kim Humphreys, DC, PhD, University of Zurich, Switzerland; Adrian Hunnisett, PhD, MPhil, McTimoney College of Chiropractic, United Kingdom; HanSuk Jung, DC, PhD, HanSeo University, South Korea; Charmaine Korporaal, MTech(Chiro), Durban University of Technology, South Africa; Henrik Hein Lauridsen, DC, MSc, PhD, Syddansk Universitet Odense, Denmark; David Lopez, DC, Universidad Central de Chile, Chile; Clay McDonald, DC, Logan University, United States; Michael Mestan, DC, New York Chiropractic College, United States; Sil Mior, PhD, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Canada; John Mrozek, DC, MEd, Texas Chiropractic College, United States; David Newell, PhD, Anglo-European College of Chiropractic, United Kingdom; Per Palmgren, PhD, Skandinaviska Kiropraktorhögskolan, Sweden; Robert Percuoco, DC, Palmer Chiropractic College, United States; Cynthia Peterson, RN, DC, MMedEd, Swiss Academy for Chiropractic; University of Zurich, Switzerland; Thiana Paula Schmidt dos Santos, DC, Centro Universitario Feevale, Brazil; Jean Theroux, BSc(Chiro), Murdoch University, Australia; Adrian Wenban, MMedSc, Barcelona College of Chiropractic, Spain; David Wickes, DC, Canadian Memorial Chiropractic College, Canada; Michael Wiles, DC, Keiser University, United States; Chris Yelverton, MTech(Chiro), University of Johannesburg, South Africa; Kenneth Young, DC, Murdoch University, Australia.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,009 | 0,064 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,005 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».