ADAMTS-13 Levels Do Not Predict Outcome in Thrombotic Thrombocytopenic Purpura: Protein S Levels Are Maintained during Plasma Exchange with Solvent Detergent Treated Plasma.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Introduction The ultimate therapy for TTP is not yet defined. While approximately 85% of patients respond to plasma exchange with FFP, the use of alternative solutions such as cryosupernatant plasma, which is deficient in the high molecular weight forms of vWF. has not been proven by appropriate randomized prospective sample trials. However, it is intellectually appealing. Additionally, the use of the ADAMTS 13 level either to predict disease or outcome has not been resolved. Methods Cryosupernatant plasma (CSP) was compared to solvent detergent treated plasma (SDP) over one cycle (nine days) of plasma exchange (PE) and subsequent procedures as required. Throughout treatment, ADAMTS 13 and protein S levels were followed. Results At the primary end point of one month, 3 of 35 of the CSP and 1 of 27 of the SDP patients died. The average platelet count was 184 × 109 per litre for CSP and 209 × 109 per litre for SDP. While vWF and FVIII were elevated in all patients at entry, no unusually large vWF multimers were seen at any time. At entry 9 patients had ≤ 0–10% ADAMTS 13 and 14 of 62 had normal levels with the rest in between. At presentation only 9 patients had 100% inhibitor activity with no inhibitor in 18 patients. Of the four patients who died, two who received CSP, had 100% enzyme activity at presentation whereas one had no ADAMTS-13 and another had 10%. All 4 patients died within 10 days. Fifteen patients with less than 10% enzyme activity had >1.5 vWF. However, elevated (>3u/mL) vWF was seen in the presence of normal ADAMTS-13 levels. Six months after remission, and in the presence of a normal platelet count, ADAMTS13 remained low in 5 patients and normal in 15.Protein S levels in 41/62 patients studied showed little variation during therapy with values on day 3 and 5, similar to those seen on entry. Conclusion In idiopathic TTP, ADAMTS 13 levels do not correlate with disease, and are not predictive of outcome. While protein S levels in the SDP were lower than those found in FFP, this did not appear to have clinical significance.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».