Hemodialysis patients receiving a greater Kt dose than recommended have reduced mortality and hospitalization risk
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Achieving an adequate dialysis dose is one of the key goals for dialysis treatments. Here we assessed whether patients receiving the current cleared plasma volume (Kt), individualized for body surface area per recommendations, had improved survival and reduced hospitalizations at 2 years of follow-up. Additionally, we assessed whether patients receiving a greater dose gained more benefit. This prospective, observational, multicenter study included 6129 patients in 65 Fresenius Medical Care Spanish facilities. Patients were classified monthly into 1 of 10 risk groups based on the difference between achieved and target Kt. Patient groups with a more negative relationship were significantly older with a higher percentage of diabetes mellitus and catheter access. Treatment dialysis time, effective blood flow, and percentage of on-line hemodiafiltration were significantly higher in groups with a higher dose. The mortality risk profile showed a progressive increase when achieved minus target Kt became more negative but was significantly lower in the group with 1 to 3 L clearance above target Kt and in groups with greater increases above target Kt. Additionally, hospitalization risk appeared significantly reduced in groups receiving 9 L or more above the minimum target. Thus, prescribing an additional 3 L or more above the minimum Kt dose could potentially reduce mortality risk, and 9 L or more reduce hospitalization risk. As such, future prospective studies are required to confirm these dose effect findings. Achieving an adequate dialysis dose is one of the key goals for dialysis treatments. Here we assessed whether patients receiving the current cleared plasma volume (Kt), individualized for body surface area per recommendations, had improved survival and reduced hospitalizations at 2 years of follow-up. Additionally, we assessed whether patients receiving a greater dose gained more benefit. This prospective, observational, multicenter study included 6129 patients in 65 Fresenius Medical Care Spanish facilities. Patients were classified monthly into 1 of 10 risk groups based on the difference between achieved and target Kt. Patient groups with a more negative relationship were significantly older with a higher percentage of diabetes mellitus and catheter access. Treatment dialysis time, effective blood flow, and percentage of on-line hemodiafiltration were significantly higher in groups with a higher dose. The mortality risk profile showed a progressive increase when achieved minus target Kt became more negative but was significantly lower in the group with 1 to 3 L clearance above target Kt and in groups with greater increases above target Kt. Additionally, hospitalization risk appeared significantly reduced in groups receiving 9 L or more above the minimum target. Thus, prescribing an additional 3 L or more above the minimum Kt dose could potentially reduce mortality risk, and 9 L or more reduce hospitalization risk. As such, future prospective studies are required to confirm these dose effect findings. Adequate dialysis dose is one of the most important goals in hemodialysis (HD) treatment and should be appropriately prescribed. Achieving a minimum dialysis dose is the responsibility of nephrologists and represents an area open to improvement. Because age, gender, and comorbidity cannot be changed, dialysis parameters should be adjusted to ensure that the patient receives the optimal treatment. Several clinical practice guidelines1NKF-DOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for hemodialysis adequacy: 2015 update.Am J Kidney Dis. 2015; 66: 884-930Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (613) Google Scholar, 2European Best Practice Guidelines for Haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002;17(Suppl 7):17–21.Google Scholar, 3The Canadian Society of Nephrology: Clinical practice guidelines the delivery of haemodialysis.J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999; 10: S306-S310PubMed Google Scholar, 4Greenwood R, Tomson C, Hoenich N. Haemodialysis – clinical standards and targets. In: The Renal Association, Royal College of Physicians of London, eds. Treatment of Adult and Children with Renal Failure. Standards and Audit Measure. Third edition, Chapter 3. London: The Lavenham Press Ltd; 2002:19–35.Google Scholar, 5Maduell F. García M. Alcázar R. Dosificación y adecuación del tratamiento dialítico. Guías SEN: Guías de Centros de hemodiálisis.Nefrología. 2006; 26: 15-21PubMed Google Scholar have recommended a minimum Kt/V or urea reduction ratio (URR) as methods for monitoring dialysis dose. Because the urea kinetic method requires pre- and post-dialysis urea determinations, monitoring is performed monthly, bimonthly, or quarterly, and the result of this 3% to 7% of total sessions is extrapolated to the totality of the treatments. Given the relevance of dialysis dose to survival and that multiple factors can influence dialytic efficacy in each session, it seems reasonable to incorporate biosensors to quantify the dose in each session and in real time. Most monitors have incorporated ionic dialysance (ID), which allows calculation of dialysis dose in all sessions, without involving any additional workload, analytical determinations, or cost.6Peticlerc T. Bene B. Jacobs C. et al.Non-invasive monitoring of effective dialysis dose delivered to the haemodialysis patient.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1995; 10: 212-216PubMed Google Scholar Consequently, many dialysis units have already abandoned urea determinations. In 1999, Lowrie et al.7Lowrie E.G. Chertow G.M. Lew N.L. et al.The urea {clearance x dialysis time} product (Kt) as an outcome-based measure of hemodialysis dose.Kidney Int. 1999; 56: 729-737Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (141) Google Scholar proposed Kt as a method of monitoring dialysis dose and mortality. These authors observed a J-shaped survival curve when they distributed the patients into quintiles from the smallest to the highest URR, while the curve descended with Kt for the same patients.8Chertow G.M. Owen W.F. Lazarus J.M. et al.Exploring the reverse J-shaped curve between urea reduction ratio and mortality.Kidney Int. 1999; 56: 1872-1878Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (111) Google Scholar In 2005, the minimum Kt dose was individualized according to body surface area (BSA)9Lowrie E.G. Li Z. Ofsthun N.J. Lazarus J.M. The online measurement of hemodialysis dose (Kt): Clinical outcome as a function of body surface area.Kidney Int. 2005; 68: 1344-1354Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (62) Google Scholar and validated in a further study.10Lowrie E.G. Li Z. Ofsthun N.J. Lazarus J.M. Evaluating a new method to judge dialysis treatment using online measurements of ionic clearance.Kidney Int. 2006; 70: 211-217Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (36) Google Scholar Since 2006, the Guidelines of the Spanish Society of Nephrology5Maduell F. García M. Alcázar R. Dosificación y adecuación del tratamiento dialítico. Guías SEN: Guías de Centros de hemodiálisis.Nefrología. 2006; 26: 15-21PubMed Google Scholar have proposed that dialysis centers with dialysis machines that have ionic dialysance use Kt to monitor dialysis dose. The Optimizing Results in Dialysis research initiative began in 2010 with the aim of improving HD patient outcomes by elucidating patient characteristics and practice of care in Spain.11Aljama P. ORD Work and Initiative Group (“Optimising Results in Dialysis”).Nefrología. 2012; Google Scholar In a study by this F. R. et of Kt of Dial Scopus Google Scholar monitoring the dialysis dose with Kt Kt/V was The authors that the of this method is that it of patients the minimum Kt while This difference was in patients with body and with a catheter and the minimum Kt in the current Spanish dialysis the aim of the Optimizing Results in Dialysis research initiative was to this prospective, observational, multicenter The was to whether patients receiving the current for an adequate dialysis dose by Kt individualized for had improved survival and reduced hospitalizations at 2 years to In we assessed whether patients receiving a greater dose greater benefit. the patients were assessed for in 65 Fresenius Medical Care Spanish facilities. the 6129 patients were included in this prospective study The was were had risk had diabetes and the was an was in of a in and in Patients were monthly into 1 of 10 risk groups based on the difference between achieved Kt and target Kt The of patient characteristics per each dialysis dose group are in The patient groups that had a more negative relationship with the were significantly older and had a higher percentage of diabetes higher comorbidity and higher percentage of as access. the groups were for and for the percentage of patients with characteristics and parameters in the 10 groups based on Kt individualized or body surface risk on to to to to to to to to are as or and diabetes in a new are as or and diabetes The effective dialysis was blood was was and body was online hemodiafiltration were performed for a total of of the sessions, and the volume was were or Medical and or The target Kt was and the achieved Kt was the was from to In the minimum target Kt dose was achieved in of were for the percentage of achieved the target Kt dose with were between the percentage of sessions with the target Kt achieved and performed by or of effective treatment dialysis and were significantly in groups with higher In the lower adjusted Kt groups showed significantly lower with the online treatment The patients included in the had from to the were between groups The the group to the highest groups L and Patients had of for the for the groups and the showed that the patients included in the 2 groups L group and the to L had higher of to the groups to L group and This result is with the higher percentage of in these groups the for each group from to the of this groups the showed that groups with outcomes for had significantly lower of to the 3 highest groups that could the of the target and adjusted were In these were the Spanish in the study were into the as a effect The and are in the of a total of HD sessions, we that all could the the of diabetes mellitus was the with a higher risk of the target was the the patients by had a significantly higher of the target to with a negative on the Kt individualized for body surface area – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – – the Spanish Fresenius Medical Care were in the as a effect diabetes blood effective treatment in a new the Spanish Fresenius Medical Care were in the as a effect diabetes blood effective treatment Patients were for 2 years or or the patients the study of in dialysis or of these patients were at the of were the follow-up. The of were and The for mortality were the of the The is in 3. the effect on the outcome was as a in a The for mortality were age, gender, risk, diabetes and and for mortality with as or – – – – – – – – – – – – – effect was as a in a diabetes effective treatment in a new The effect was as a in a diabetes effective treatment whether patients receiving an adequate dialysis dose could have a reduced mortality risk, and adjusted were that were as for mortality were into the adjusted The group was the one that incorporated the to Results with for each group are in 3. The mortality risk profile showed a a progressive increase in mortality risk with negative The for the lower group was with significantly higher mortality risk to to the as the into the and became significantly lower at the to L group and for and adjusted L and the mortality risk profile and significantly lower the group were for the of of that were as in of for these outcomes The risk appeared to be lower as the into the for and from to L and and of from any to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to to included in the were gender, risk, diabetes age, treatment effective treatment time, and Spanish Fresenius Medical Care facilities. were from in a new The included in the were gender, risk, diabetes age, treatment effective treatment time, and Spanish Fresenius Medical Care facilities. were from the of the study groups it be that the more and groups and with catheter to target Kt and have greater mortality Thus, the adjusted included all of the mortality for this we cannot a this we to use a the 10 study into 2 groups according to HD to or the dose group to and greater the group with reduced mortality according to to to these 2 for as with an on the target Kt The was assessed and the adjusted was to the mortality risk. The that an HD dose as above L was with a reduction in risk for mortality to the lower HD group were for of the total included patients the follow-up. The of were and a negative in hospitalization risk with the progressive increases in dialysis dose was In the as the groups became more the as in the mortality risk the hospitalization risk appeared to the with the to L group in the and with the to L group in the In this the current for monitoring dialysis dose with Kt individualized for were validated in the current Spanish dialysis and to be dose higher or lower the recommended minimum is with lower or higher and hospitalization risk. this is the prospective that prescribing more 1 to 3 L of the current Kt individualized for mortality risk and more 9 L hospitalization risk. Thus, adjusted and risk profile that an adequate dialysis dose as by Kt individualized for improved the in HD dialysis dose are based on analytical pre- and post-dialysis urea determinations. and Spanish guidelines1NKF-DOQI Clinical Practice Guideline for hemodialysis adequacy: 2015 update.Am J Kidney Dis. 2015; 66: 884-930Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (613) Google Scholar, 2European Best Practice Guidelines for Haemodialysis. Nephrol Dial Transplant 2002;17(Suppl 7):17–21.Google Scholar, 3The Canadian Society of Nephrology: Clinical practice guidelines the delivery of haemodialysis.J Am Soc Nephrol. 1999; 10: S306-S310PubMed Google Scholar, 4Greenwood R, Tomson C, Hoenich N. Haemodialysis – clinical standards and targets. In: The Renal Association, Royal College of Physicians of London, eds. Treatment of Adult and Children with Renal Failure. Standards and Audit Measure. Third edition, Chapter 3. London: The Lavenham Press Ltd; 2002:19–35.Google Scholar, 5Maduell F. García M. Alcázar R. Dosificación y adecuación del tratamiento dialítico. Guías SEN: Guías de Centros de hemodiálisis.Nefrología. 2006; 26: 15-21PubMed Google Scholar a minimum Kt/V of a of Kt/V of and a of to ensure that these minimum are urea measurements are monthly, bimonthly, or to the dialysis the from this 3% to 7% of the total sessions be extrapolated to that in all Because multiple factors can influence dialytic efficacy in each HD session, have to quantify the dose by the patient in each session and in real time. Most monitors have incorporated which allows the dialysis dose to be in all sessions, without involving additional workload, analytical determinations, or cost.6Peticlerc T. Bene B. Jacobs C. et al.Non-invasive monitoring of effective dialysis dose delivered to the haemodialysis patient.Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1995; 10: 212-216PubMed Google Scholar Consequently, many dialysis units have already abandoned urea determinations. In the of the and urea measurements the urea and as a authors have in HD and as Kt/V have that Kt/V from analytical the between is C. M. F. dialysance as a method for the on-line monitoring of delivered dialysis without blood Dial Transplant. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, et online monitoring of ionic dialysance allows of delivered hemodialysis treatment Int. 2006; 10: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar which between the methods the be but it is an that can be by as by the Kt by the analytical or by M. et of the dialysis dose by ionic dialysance and Google Scholar Kt/V by is with pre- to post-dialysis C. M. F. dialysance as a method for the on-line monitoring of delivered dialysis without blood Dial Transplant. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, et online monitoring of ionic dialysance allows of delivered hemodialysis treatment Int. 2006; 10: PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, et dialysance and the of the influence of of on method Dial Transplant. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, et of methods for urea volume for use in on-line monitoring of haemodialysis Dial Transplant. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar these Kt/V with validated the of Kt of Kt/V was proposed as a method to monitor dialysis E.G. Chertow G.M. Lew N.L. et al.The urea {clearance x dialysis time} product (Kt) as an outcome-based measure of hemodialysis dose.Kidney Int. 1999; 56: 729-737Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (141) Google Scholar it of the J-shaped survival which when patients are distributed according to the or G.M. Owen W.F. Lazarus J.M. et al.Exploring the reverse J-shaped curve between urea reduction ratio and mortality.Kidney Int. 1999; 56: 1872-1878Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (111) Google Scholar In a minimum Kt dose was individualized in of E.G. Li Z. Ofsthun N.J. Lazarus J.M. The online measurement of hemodialysis dose (Kt): Clinical outcome as a function of body surface area.Kidney Int. 2005; 68: 1344-1354Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (62) Google Scholar and validated in patients in a study as a measure a E.G. Li Z. Ofsthun N.J. Lazarus J.M. Evaluating a new method to judge dialysis treatment using online measurements of ionic clearance.Kidney Int. 2006; 70: 211-217Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (36) Google Scholar In the Spanish monitoring the dialysis dose with Kt of Kt/V from to of patients the minimum Kt while F. R. et of Kt of Dial Scopus Google Scholar, F. M. N. et as and of the dose at a hemodialysis Google Scholar, M. de et calculation as a of haemodialysis Google Scholar in patients with and with a body F. R. et of Kt of Dial Scopus Google Scholar authors have proposed Kt/V to T. et method of dialysis dose to body surface area – for patients by PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, et dose to body surface area and patient J Am Soc Nephrol. 2012; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar or using methods of for the dialysis C. C. et of methods for dialysis Dial Transplant. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar of these into clinical practice of the in In the use of Kt is it is by the monitor and use to the of biosensors with The real of dialysis dose monitoring in the in adequate dialysis treatment. In a study in a dialysis E.G. Li Z. Ofsthun N.J. Lazarus J.M. Evaluating a new method to judge dialysis treatment using online measurements of ionic clearance.Kidney Int. 2006; 70: 211-217Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (36) Google Scholar the delivered Kt was L and was In a study in a Spanish dialysis F. R. et of Kt of Dial Scopus Google Scholar the delivered Kt was L and the was In the current in a Spanish dialysis the delivered Kt was L and the was These HD in the 10 with the minimum Kt achieved in and The study as an mortality risk and that minimum target Kt is 1 to 3 L or the risk of and mortality could be Thus, to survival should be an in the minimum target Kt of to from 1 to 3 L or higher Several groups have that the Kt/V could to in T. T. et dose and the effect of and body on outcome in the Int. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, et dialysis dose is with lower mortality but J Kidney Dis. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar, Kt/V the hemodialysis dose in and Int. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar In a we that of minimum Kt was lower in while in the we observed an in a difference The risk of in patients with In the use of as a of et use in and the from the Int. Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar et F. M. M. et should dialysis be when are Scholar that the should be by a catheter is in the and by in an In the the percentage of patients with was higher in a study 3 years and the for the target the percentage of patients the target Kt was higher 3 years The of this were the use of higher 65 and an of this study that should be in patients with by to the target Kt. increases dialysis dose and the risk. The percentage of patients receiving online in this that this of treatment is with survival in the of the F. F. M. et online hemodiafiltration reduce mortality in hemodialysis Am Soc Nephrol. PubMed Scopus Google Scholar clinical B. et and mortality in a from Dial PubMed Scopus Google Scholar and et group – an on a and a PubMed Scopus Google Scholar that the mortality by online is to a higher dialysis the study was to the effect of online on and the and are for an and of mortality in study and were by dialysis dose above to 9 L could reduce mortality risk and The of this study for a relationship between dialysis dose and mortality. is important to in that the et of dialysis dose and in J PubMed Scopus Google Scholar is the clinical to the effect of dialysis and that clinical guidelines have Kt/V as the minimum recommended dose. it is important to that the was the of the which that is when between dialysis dose and T. T. et of achieved dialysis dose with mortality in the hemodialysis an of Am Soc Nephrol. 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar this we have in of patients that patients receiving a higher dialysis dose have a reduced mortality risk of the The progressive of ionic dialysance monitors in dialysis units and to this for monitoring new be that mortality can be further reduced with higher Kt adjusted for dose. In to this we that a prospective, study be patients with from 1 to 3 L target to this dose or to increase it to higher 9 This study but is that the function was and it with survival in HD T. et of with of and in hemodialysis The for outcomes in for J Kidney Dis. 56: Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus Google Scholar and the dialysis The of this study the and prospective as as current HD the In current for monitoring the dialysis dose with Kt individualized for have validated in this prospective study in the current Spanish dialysis and the dose is with and hospitalization risk. an additional 3 L or more of the current Kt individualized for could reduce the risk of and an additional 9 L or more could reduce the risk of The clinical was as a prospective, observational, multicenter study in patients HD performed in all of the Spanish facilities. included patients the by the and for to the the Fresenius Medical Care clinical R. et study of patients on haemodialysis in in using from the from years 2012; Google Scholar The for this is The was to whether patients receiving the current of an adequate dialysis dose by Kt individualized for have improved survival at to to as as to whether patients receiving a greater dose more benefit. the outcome was the to of from any and with the dialysis dose key outcome was to measure the same with hospitalization risk. The for study were patients receiving HD for at any Spanish The patients have had or more of Kt each The were or of these were to patients monthly for further Given that this was an nephrologists current clinical recommendations, and dialysis dose was according to Spanish guidelines Kt by ionic dialysance was by as by with the or using The patients were with or Medical with These measurement of the dialysis dose each dialysis treatment. This the effective in urea clearance and the P. P. M. et of dialysis a clinical of PubMed Scopus Google Scholar The Fresenius to the of Kt measurements was in all dialysis The target Kt was monthly for each patient using the minimum target Kt in with in with body as and in E.G. Li Z. Ofsthun N.J. Lazarus J.M. The online measurement of hemodialysis dose (Kt): Clinical outcome as a function of body surface area.Kidney Int. 2005; 68: 1344-1354Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (62) Google Scholar, E.G. Li Z. Ofsthun N.J. Lazarus J.M. Evaluating a new method to judge dialysis treatment using online measurements of ionic clearance.Kidney Int. 2006; 70: 211-217Abstract Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (36) Google Scholar Thus, the adequate dialysis dose was by the difference between achieved Kt and target Kt Kt – target to as As an Kt individualized for and in this on in a F. R. et of Kt of Dial Scopus Google Scholar the HD was monthly to 1 of 10 lower to to to L to to to to to or higher The parameters were and as age, gender, risk factors as P. et for in and 2005; PubMed Scopus Google Scholar diabetes mellitus as or as treatment HD or online dialysis achieved target post-dialysis body and in use as or was included in the Additionally, the were and function was of The were according to 10 of the are as and as by or and and as The was to the for parameters distributed and for distributed with to of multiple were performed to the groups in the factors the of the minimum target Kt session by session in the were using the of outcomes using Scholar These were the patients as in an to incorporate of the prescribing of treatment in the Spanish were included in the as a The effect of the was in with risk a effect the outcome were as The were in a in an to HD these were to to to and age, these were to to to and these were to 65 to to and these were to and these were to to to and these were to to to and The and outcomes of this were to the dialysis dose by Kt and adjusted for improved the of the this were performed to the for all of the groups using a for the Kt the were all the and factors The of the relationship between the and the outcome was as for the effect on a with the centers in the study was The group the for the was as for these and at were for As a we a to with the reverse we the for each patient by the of receiving an HD dose to or to or more to the group at The were into the all of the with an on the of the target Kt and the to in a ratio groups using a this of a to of the of the of the of had to Results of an and PubMed Scopus Google Scholar the of the we assessed the in by the difference and between the groups and the The in this were performed using The was with an for F. in Scholar using was The Optimizing Results in Dialysis group is a by and are of Fresenius Medical the authors The authors all of the 65 Fresenius Medical Care Spanish without in the of the this study could have with and HD dose with of effect on mortality in study with characteristics and with the individualized for each patient for of target Kt by the Kt 1 in prescribing target Kt dose adjusted for body surface area hemodialysis use of Kt/V to and monitor hemodialysis the current it is for dose and monitoring have In a prospective study in this et online ionic the between outcome and hospitalization and the to which delivered Kt dose achieved target Kt from of body surface PDF
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».