MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2537879552 · doi:10.1093/eurheartj/ehw457

Close connections between contraction and rhythm: a new genetic cause of atrial fibrillation/cardiomyopathy and what it can teach us

2016· letter· en· W2537879552 sur OpenAlexafffund
Stanley Nattel

Notice bibliographique

RevueEuropean Heart Journal · 2016
Typeletter
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAtrial Fibrillation Management and Outcomes
Établissements canadiensUniversité de MontréalMcGill UniversityMontreal Heart Institute
Organismes subventionnairesCanadian Institutes of Health Research
Mots-clésFrameshift mutationMedicineGeneticsAtrial fibrillationMolecular geneticsGeneBioinformaticsCardiologyBiologyMutation

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

This editorial refers to ‘A frameshift deletion in the sarcomere gene MYL4 causes early-onset familial atrial fibrillation’†, by D.F. Gudbjartsson et al., on page 27. A review of the literature published a decade ago reported that almost nothing was known about the genetics of atrial fibrillation (AF), but suggested that ‘Identifying the gene of susceptibility, coupled with defining the sequence and function of the protein that it encodes, has the potential to provide both insight into the pathophysiology of the arrhythmia and diagnostic tools with which to identify susceptible individuals’.1 Subsequent work has richly confirmed the validity of this statement. A recent review listed 33 rare variants and 14 genetic loci associated with AF, and discussed the importance of their discovery for pathophysiological understanding and clinical practice.2 Of the rare variants, the most common motifs are variants in ion-channel subunits (in 21) and transcription factors (in 6). AF clearly has a strong heritable basis2 and it is likely that the discovery of novel AF-associated loci will continue to occur and to improve our understanding of this widely prevalent condition. In the present issue of the journal, Gudbjartsson et al. report just such a finding.3 They used highly sophisticated whole-genome sequencing and statistical genetics methods to identify sequence variants linked to early-onset AF in 1799 Icelanders. These approaches revealed a rare frameshift deletion in the atrial myosin light-chain gene MYL4 associating with early-onset AF under recessive inheritance models. Eight homozygous carriers all had early-onset AF, three required pacemakers for sick sinus syndrome, three had strokes (without non-AF risk factors), and one experienced sudden death. ECG intervals were generally unremarkable. The only abnormalities present on early echocardiograms were left atrial dilation in two patients. Late echocardiograms showed disease progression, with left atrial enlargement in all, mild ventricular dilation in 4/6 individuals, and reduced ejection fraction in 2. Overall, the findings indicate atrial-selective abnormalities associated with conduction system disease, stroke, and eventually mild ventricular dysfunction. These results position MYL4 mutations as a novel cause of atrial cardiomyopathy. Schematic representation of the localization of MYL4 in the cardiac contractile protein apparatus, and how MYL4 dysfunction might lead to electrical dysfunction and arrhythmias via impaired contractility and disruption of sarcomere integrity, with loss of co-ordination of contractile, structural, and signalling proteins leading to dramatic electrical consequences. Red arrows indicate causal sequences; solid arrows are already demonstrated mechanisms, while dashed arrows are speculated mechanisms. Loss of MYL4 function is known to impair contractility. Sarcomere disruption probaby results from altered atrial contractility and could also be a direct consequence of altered contractile protein interactions due to abnormal essential light chain function. Loss of Z-disk proteins alters cell signalling. actin+, actin and associated proteins such as troponin and tropomyosin; AF, atrial fibrillation; AV, atroventricular; myosin+, myosin and associated proteins. The mechanistic link between MYL4 and AF remains to be clarified. The clinical phenotype points to an atrial cardiomyopathy, with associated conduction system abnormalities,3 consistent with prior evidence of highly atrial-selective expression and contractile effects.6,–8 A very recent study reported a family presenting early-onset AF, with all afflicted members carrying a MYL4 mutation (E11K) that substitutes the basic amino acid lysine for glutamic acid.11 Affected individuals had AF onset between 22 and 32 years of age, depressed atrial contractile function, and evidence of conduction system disease including profound sinus node dysfunction. P-wave amplitude became extremely small prior to AF onset and the atria showed large areas of electrical silence. The authors created a transgenic zebrafish line expressing a corresponding mutation (E17K) in the zebrafish MYL4 orthologue under control of an atrial-specific myh6 promoter. E17K transgenics showed abnormal sinus node function, prolonged PR interval, and substantial atrial dilation. Their Z-disks were largely absent, and sarcomere structure was severely disturbed. The finding of a clear link between MYL4 mutations and early-onset AF provides new insights into the genetic basis of the condition and underlying pathophysiological mechanisms. Atrial cardiomyopathy is becoming increasingly recognized as an important entity,12 and MYL4 dysfunction is an interesting new paradigm for primary atrial cardiomyopathies. At the same time, the work raises a host of new and stimulating questions. The properties of MYL4 as an important atrial-specific contractile protein account for the abnormal atrial mechanical function observed with MYL4 mutation. What causes the profound associated electrophysiological abnormalities, including severe sinus node dysfunction, atrioventricular block, and ultimately AF, is unclear. Heart failure is clearly an important cause of AF.13 This association is generally attributed to the substantial atrial remodelling caused by the haemodynamic and neurohumoral consequences of heart failure.14 However, MYL4 dysfunction is not expected to disrupt ventricular function; indeed, ventricular dysfunction is unusual in patients bearing MYL4 mutations and is a mild and late manifestation when it does occur.3 Thus, the atrial electrical disturbances noted with MYL4 mutations must be due to changes resulting from primary atrial contractile dysfunction, and not secondary consequences of heart failure. What these changes are and why they happen are presently unclear—discovery and clarification of the mechanisms might lead to important new insights into atrial physiology and AF pathophysiology. MYL4 dysfunction greatly alters atrial cardiomyocyte ultrastructure, presumably via the effects of altered mechanical stresses.11 Z-disks, located at the lateral disks of sarcomeres, are extremely complex macromolecular complexes containing hundreds of proteins that serve crucial roles in contraction, cell structure, and signalling.15 Loss of integrin-linked kinase, an important Z-disk protein, causes arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy.16 The severe disruption of atrial Z-disk integrity observed in MYL4-mutated zebrafish11 might therefore cause signalling and transcriptional changes that grossly affect electrical function. On the other hand, altered mechanical forces may affect crucial subcellular structures and protein functions that are not within the Z-disks to interfere with electrophysiological properties. A schematic representation of the possible pathophysiological mechanisms is shown in Figure 1. Discovering precisely how and why the atrial electrophysiological changes occur with MYL4 abnormalities could provide novel insights relevant not only to the mechanisms of MYL4-associated cardiomyopathy, but also more broadly to atrial and even ventricular cardiomyopathy in general. If cardiac remodelling and electrical disturbances can be a direct result of mechanical dysfunction (and not simply secondary changes due to cardiac failure), the important rhythm disturbances associated with ventricular cardiomyopathies may also directly result from the electrophysiological consequences of anomalous contraction properties. Detailing the underlying mechanisms might have important pathophysiological and clinical implications. While the treatment of arrhythmias has advanced enormously over the past decades, major challenges remain.17 AF remains a particularly difficult and important clinical problem. New mechanistic insights have the potential to advance greatly the risk prediction, prevention, and management of AF. Therefore, discoveries of novel molecular AF paradigms, such as that of MYL4 dysfunction, are crucially important. An interesting aspect of the Gudbjartsson report is the very high prevalence of stroke in MYL4 mutation carriers (3/8, 37.5%) despite the absence of risk factors. This observation probably reflects the important atrial contractile disturbances caused by dysfunctional MYL4, and is reminiscent of amyloid cardiomyopathy, another form of atrial cardiomyopathy with strongly reduced atrial contractility and a high risk of stroke.18 Further work on the basis for the high stroke risk in MYL4 mutation patients may lead to improved mechanistic understanding and management of this crucially important AF-related complication. Mechanical–electrical interactions are known to be potentially significant controllers of cardiac physiology.19 The MYL4 atrial cardiomyopathy is a striking exemplar of dramatic and clinically important cardiac electrical dysfunction resulting from a primary abnormality in the contractile apparatus. We look forward to the exciting new insights that will surely emerge from its discovery. Supported by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research and the Quebec Heart and Stroke Foundation. Conflict of interest: none declared.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,008
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,007
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,015

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,008
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,001
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,003
Communication savante0,0040,004
Science ouverte0,0020,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0070,012
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,075
Tête enseignante GPT0,327
Écart entre enseignants0,251 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations26
Publié2016
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEuropean Heart JournalMême sujetAtrial Fibrillation Management and OutcomesTravaux en français237 207