Molecular Characterization of Clonotypic VDJ Sequences in Waldenstrom’s Macroglobulinemia Suggests Independent Transformation Events in the Development of Biclonal B Cells.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Malignant B lineage cells in Waldenstrom’s macroglobulinemia (WM) express a unique clonotypic VDJ associated with IgM. Studies of WM patients revealed a frequent incidence of biclonal B cells (16%) as defined by the presence of two distinct clonotypic VDJ sequences. This is the first report to estimate the frequency of biclonality in WM. Four WM cases are reported: two with distinct IgM clones (WM1-19 and WM1-09), one with distinct IgM/IgA clones (WM1-18), and one with related but diversified IgM/IgG clones (WM10). In 2 cases (WM1-19 and WM10), the two clonotypic signatures were found to be abundant in bone marrow (BM) but less frequent in blood, reminiscent of monoclonal WM cases. In WM1-19, single cell analysis showed that only one partner VDJ was expressed per cell, excluding the possibility of aberrant biallelic rearrangements. The distribution ratio between the two tumor clones was 2:1, suggestive of their mutual role in the clinical manifestation. In the other 2 cases (WM1-09 and WM1-18), partner clones were shown by CDR3 fragment analysis to be anatomically distinct, with one BM clonotypic signature and one in blood. In these 2 patients, the BM clone was hypermutated (6.2% and 3.8%) while the blood clone was germline or minimally mutated (0% and 1.0%). Partner clones lacked intraclonal diversity and Ig class switching, characteristic of malignant WM clones, suggesting relatively frequent transformation events throughout B lineage differentiation. The biological events leading to the appearance of clones in two different anatomic sites and the clinical implications remain to be understood. CDR3 fragment analysis in the longitudinal studies of WM1-09 and WM1-18 suggested that the repertoire of blood B cells may recover some level of diversity after successive cycles of treatment (WM1-18), while the persistence of the monoclonal peak (WM1-09) likely reflects a tumor that does not respond to treatment. In WM10, biclonal IgM/IgG B cell clones shared common VDJ gene rearrangement. The IgG clone displayed a higher mutation rate than did the IgM clone (9.7% vs. 6.1%). Increased somatic hypermutation in IgG consists mostly of replacement mutations that are clustered within the CDR regions, strongly supporting a contention that the IgG clone has undergone affinity maturation. There are 11 point mutations in the IgM that are not present in the IgG, suggesting that the two clones are distinctly different and belong to different branches of the genealogical tree. These distinct mutational signatures suggest that biclonal IgM/IgG clones are unlikely derived from clonal evolution. Overall, our results suggest that for the four biclonal WM evaluated here, the partner B cell clones appear to have undergone separate transformation events in the development of biclonality. The extent to which each partner clone contributes to disease progression and death, whether separately or in synergy, is as yet unknown.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».