MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2541417807 · doi:10.1093/trstmh/trw062

Biomedical technologies for the prevention of sexually transmitted infections and HIV for adolescent girls and young women

2016· editorial· en· W2541417807 sur OpenAlexafffund
Manjulaa Narasimhan, Sten H. Vermund, Gina Ogilvie

Notice bibliographique

RevueTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene · 2016
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueSyphilis Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensBC Centre for Disease ControlUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesNational Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesCenters for Disease Control and PreventionBritish Columbia Centre for Disease ControlNational Institute of Mental HealthWorld Health OrganizationUnited States Agency for International Development
Mots-clésHuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV)MedicineSexually transmitted diseaseSexually activeAdolescent developmentPediatricsImmunologyPsychologyDevelopmental psychologySyphilis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Policies and programmes to reach adolescent girls and young women (AGYW) are critical to meet the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) that guide international health and development efforts. The high burden of sexual and reproductive health challenges include sexual and physical violence experienced by one in three girls aged 15–19 years.1 Additional sexual and reproductive health barriers include unequal gender norms, lack of information, low agency (i.e., sense of empowerment) and discriminatory laws and policies. For AGYW living in high sexually transmitted infections (STI) incidence settings, there are compounded risks of HIV and pregnancy.2 UNAIDS estimates that 65% of all new HIV infections among young people aged 10–24 years are among AGYW, reflecting their biological and social vulnerabilities.3 WHO convened an expert meeting (31 May to 1 June 2016, Vancouver) to identify approaches to catalyse STI/HIV prevention in AGYW in the context of comprehensive sexual and reproductive health and rights (SRHR). The goal was to identify factors within combination prevention and implementation of biomedical interventions to strengthen HIV prevention and SRHR. This expert meeting built upon two global WHO consultations on lessons learned from: (1) the first generation of scaled up ASRH programmes (4–6 April 2016, Geneva) and (2) SRH programming to catalyse HIV prevention for adolescent girls and young women (27–29 April 2016, Geneva).4 Public health opportunities have emerged for STI/HIV prevention. Major biomedical interventions include efficacious STI vaccines against human papillomavirus (HPV) and hepatitis B virus (HBV), and oral pre-exposure prophylaxis (PrEP) for HIV prevention with antiretroviral drugs. Intervention research seeks to explore strategies for enhancing PrEP demand and adherence among AGYW. Multipurpose prevention technologies (MPTs) seek to develop and deliver co-packaged or co-formulated combinations of HIV/STI/pregnancy prevention products. At the global policy level, global consensus supports the United Nations Global Strategy for Women's, Children's and Adolescents’ Health (2016–2030); WHO's Global Strategies for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, and STIs (2016–2021); and WHO's Global Plan of Action to address violence against women, girls and children.5–7 The growing evidence base about what does not work in ASRH programming for AGYW must evolve new approaches that support human rights-based strategies to increase autonomy, agency and choice.8 A human rights framework will require a substantial shift in health programming from a disease perspective to a holistic one that focuses on community and social contexts. Given the demographic increase in numbers of adolescents worldwide, there is an urgency to think critically, be visionary and do things more effectively. HPV vaccine programmes have been entry points for more comprehensive sexual and reproductive health programmes for adolescent girls and, in some settings, boys. Concerns that the vaccine may encourage young people to have sex are unfounded; in fact, AGYW who have received HPV vaccines are significantly more likely to have protected sex and no more likely to have early sexual debut.9 Global 2006–2014 coverage estimates by region reveal only 1% of an estimated 118 million girls who received the HPV vaccine were from low or low-middle income countries (LMIC).10 Hence, strengthening LMIC programmes remains an enormous challenge for AGYW at high risk of STI/HIV and is a promising start for enhanced delivery of comprehensive SRH services to youth. Most MPTs in development are targeting prevention of HIV and unintended pregnancy, and some products show activity against herpes simplex virus (HSV). Single indication probiotic products are being evaluated for bacterial vaginosis, an important contributor to inflammation-mediated HIV risk. Five USAID-funded MPii projects are designed to accelerate introduction and uptake of new HIV prevention methods for AGYW. In addition to the DREAMS (Determined, Resilient, Empowered, AIDS-free, Mentored and Safe) partnership of the US President's Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR), these projects can help guide introduction and testing of new products such as PrEP and long-acting injectable HIV prophylaxis (analogous to long-acting injectable contraception) or novel topical prophylaxis for AGYW. The global roadmap for STI vaccine development identifies priority action areas, including better epidemiological data on STI, modelling the potential impact of STI vaccines, advancing translational research, defining preferred product characteristics to meet priority public health goals, expediting clinical development and evaluation, and encouraging investment.11,12 STI vaccines are in basic research development (Trichomonas vaginalis), preclinical development (Treponema palladium, Neisseria gonorrhoeae, Chlamydia trachomatis) and clinical trials (HSV). An STI vaccine consortium is being established to help coordinate roadmap activities. The global public health agenda has not placed sufficient emphasis on the STI/HIV prevention needs of AGYW. An integrated, multi-sectoral and rights-based approach to improve access to SRH/STI/HIV services can empower vulnerable, at-risk, AGYW.4 Financing strategies will be important for the development of innovative biomedical technologies and the implementation of effective prevention strategies and strengthening health systems. Funders need to ensure that any programming for adolescents encourages integration and does not further create silos. In addition, AGYW themselves play a central role in driving processes and programmes as thought partners and change agents. Providing ongoing opportunities to engage youth in designing and implementing programmes and policies and building community engagement and capacity within health services are essential for uptake of services, particularly for AGYW in LMIC who are difficult to reach.13 The social and economic repercussions of SRH challenges include school drop-out, exacerbating vulnerabilities. Greater emphasis and success in the adolescent SRHR agenda must become an urgent global imperative. Authors' contributions: All authors conceived the article, drafted the paper and critically revised the paper. All authors read and approved the final version. SHV is guarantor of the paper. Acknowledgements: The authors would like to thank the participants in the expert meeting for sharing their time and expertise. Funding: Financial support for the consultation from the British Columbia Centre for Disease Control (BC-CDC) and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID) is gratefully acknowledged. The contents are the responsibility of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the organisations involved in this meeting. Competing interests: None. Ethical approval: Not required.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,011
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,033
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Éditorial · Signal consensuel: Éditorial
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,021
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,060

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0110,033
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0060,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0050,004
Bibliométrie0,0040,002
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0030,003
Communication savante0,0080,005
Science ouverte0,0040,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0210,026
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0090,007

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,014
Tête enseignante GPT0,287
Écart entre enseignants0,273 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreÉditorial

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations4
Publié2016
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentnon

Explorer davantage

Même revueTransactions of the Royal Society of Tropical Medicine and HygieneMême sujetSyphilis Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207