Notice bibliographique
Résumé
ANOTHER SUMMER full of restful and enjoyable days has ended, and now a new academic year begins. In this issue of the Journal, we again have a nice blend of topics on important issues, some of which we expect will inform your programs over this coming year. We also continue to receive submissions from individuals outside the United States, which confirms the broadening influence of JAH beyond our borders. In this issue, as evidence of the international involvement, submissions are included from Canada and the United Kingdom. Measuring clinical effectiveness (CE) and implementing evidence-based practice (EBP) are fast becoming major components in health care delivery. There is a question, however, regarding the level of knowledge and the application of these concepts by various professional groups. Upton and Upton report on their study that compares the knowledge and practice patterns among 14 professional groups in the United Kingdom. They surveyed 1000 professionals who were members of one of the allied health professions or health science services. They found significant differences in knowledge among the groups regarding EBP and CE, with many of the allied health professionals reporting a higher level of knowledge and application than those in the health science services. Two of the major reported barriers to implementing EBP were lack of time and money. As with most groups in higher education, tenure policies and practices are important issues for allied health faculty. Balogun and Sloan summarize their study comparing the perceptions of nursing and allied health deans on tenure practices and trends. Generally, both groups agreed on the value of certain practices and expressed strong support for the tenure system. Among the more interesting findings was that 77% of hoth groups ranked teaching as the primary criteria used in tenure decisions. It is clear that the health care team is becoming more and more involved in patient care. However, many students graduate from their programs without a clear knowledge of the roles and scope of practice of those other professionals with whom they will he working. Deborah Insalaco and colleagues report on the results of their study of the perception of the roles of occupational therapists, physical therapists, and speech-language pathologists on the stroke rehabilitation team. A survey was administered to graduating students after their final clinical experience. She found that students had a good working knowledge of the primary roles of each of the other professions hut did not agree on the boundaries of practice of the other groups. There was also disagreement regarding the specific roles other professions should play in some medical conditions. The authors recommend that students have more opportunities for collaborative learning during their education. Butterwick and his team claim that until relatively recently, specific technical skills in many professions have not been subject to evaluation using valid and reliable instruments. They present a description of the process used in the development of an instrument using the skill of athletic taping as an example. Their team conducted a thorough task analysis of the skill in five different joints on the body. The instrument that emerged was pilot tested with a cohort of athletic therapy program students and revised. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) is an important indicator of how an individual's health affects his or her ability to function. A better understanding of the determinants of functional ability is important as the population ages, particularly in rural areas. There is some evidence to suggest that self-reported HRQoL can he a very reliable indicator of quality of life and a useful guide to making collaborative treatment decisions. Cleary and Howell discuss the results of their study of individuals aged 65 and older in rural Idaho. …
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,021 | 0,042 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,010 | 0,006 |
| Communication savante | 0,030 | 0,026 |
| Science ouverte | 0,004 | 0,018 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,011 | 0,026 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,189 | 0,135 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».