MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2546061993 · doi:10.1182/blood.v124.21.703.703

Clinical Significance of Genetic Aberrations in Diffuse Large B Cell Lymphoma

2014· article· en· W2546061993 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Daisuke Ennishi, Christoffer Hoffer, Hennady P. Shulha, Anja Mottok, Pedro Farinha, Fong Chun Chan, Barbara Meissner, Merrill Boyle, Susana Ben‐Neriah, Ryan D. Morin, Marco A. Marra, Kerry J. Savage, Laurie H. Sehn, Joseph M. Connors, Christian Steidl, David W. Scott, Randy D. Gascoyne

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensSpinal Cord Injury BCSimon Fraser UniversityBC Cancer Agency
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésDiffuse large B-cell lymphomaOncologySNP arrayBiologyCDKN2APopulationPTENCancerLymphomaCancer researchInternal medicineMedicineGeneticsGeneGenotypeSingle-nucleotide polymorphism

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Although R-CHOP has significantly improved outcome in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 40% of patients still experience relapsed/refractory disease. Further investigation into the genomic architecture of DLBCL is needed to determine the biological correlates that underlie treatment failure. Recent studies using next-generation sequencing strategies have described the landscape of recurrent mutations in DLBCL. However, with the exception of TP53 and FOXO1, little is known about the clinical relevance of recurrent mutations and importantly, the interactions of these genetic alterations in DLBCL. Moreover, an integrated analysis of copy number alterations and recurrent mutations annotated across cell-of-origin (COO) distinctions for a large cohort of DLBCL cases who have received uniform therapy is lacking. The present study examined the frequency and clinical impact of recurrent genetic aberrations of DLBCL using high-resolution technologies in a large population-based DLBCL cohort. Methods: We analyzed 348 newly diagnosed DLBCL cases that were uniformly treated with R-CHOP at the BC Cancer Agency (Vancouver) with available DNA extracted from fresh frozen biopsy material (tumor content >30%). Matched germ line DNA was available for 67 patients. Comprehensive clinical annotation was available through the BCCA Lymphoid Cancer Database. Targeted re-sequencing of the coding exons of 56 genes was performed using a Truseq Custom Amplicon assay. Gene selection was based on mutational frequencies that have been previously described in DLBCL mutational landscape publications. High-resolution copy number analyses were performed using Affymetrix SNP 6.0 arrays. Tissue microarrays were constructed using duplicate 0.6mm cores from 332 cases, and breakapart FISH assays for MYC, BCL2 and BCL6 and IHC staining for MYC, BCL2 and cell of origin proteins were performed. COO classification was available in 331 cases, according to gene expression profiling by the Lymph2Cx assay using the NanoString platform (Scott, Blood 2014;123) in 299 patients as well as Hans algorithm (Hans, Blood 2004;103) in 32 cases with low tumor content. 194 cases were assigned to GCB subtype, 107 cases, ABC/non-GCB and 30 were unclassifiable. Results: In the mutation analysis, we identified 2,757 SNVs and 245 small indels. The mean depth of coverage was 634. Recurrent mutation frequencies varied between 0 and 58, with a mean of 8.25 per case. 98% of cases harbored at least one mutation and 95% of cases multiple mutations. 10 mutated genes were detected significantly more frequently in the GCB subtype including CREBBP, GNA13, EZH2, TNFRSF14, IRF8,STAT3, BCL2, SGK1, MEF2B and CD83, and 4 mutated genes, MYD88, CD79B, PRDM1 and PIM1, in the ABC subtype. In the copy number analysis, 45 significant amplification peaks and 57 deletion peaks were revealed by the GISTIC algorithm. As previously reported, 9p21.3, including CDKN2A,were more frequently detected in the ABC subtypes. With a median follow up of 6.5 years for living patients, the 5 y disease specific survival (DSS) and time to progression (TTP) of all patients were 72% and 64%, respectively. The clinical cohort was representative of registry data from BC based on a comparison of patient characteristics and survival outcomes with 1,194 control DLBCL R-CHOP patients. The ABC subtype was significantly associated with an inferior DSS and TTP (both p<0.0001). In univariate analyses we identified several gene mutations and copy number aberrations significantly associated with survival in all patients. Of these genes, MYD88 and TP53 mutations were associated with significantly inferior TTP in the ABC subtype (p=0.04) and GCB subtype (p=0.002), respectively, while TMEM30A, CREBBP, PIM1 and BTG1 mutations were associated with prognosis in DLBCL. Our analyses confirm the poor prognosis conferred by TP53 mutations in DLBCL and, importantly, identified several novel genetic alterations associated with survival stratified by COO distinctions. Conclusions: Our approach using next generation sequencing and high resolution SNP array provides an accurate estimation of frequency and clinical significance of recurrent genetic alterations of DLBCL in a uniformly R-CHOP-treated large population-based cohort of patients. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,004

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,281
Écart entre enseignants0,265 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2014
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→Travaux en français237 207→