A Retrospective Case Review of Adverse Drug Reactions Using Intravenous Iron in Non-Hemodialysis Patients.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Intravenous iron therapy is commonly used in hemodialysis patients but has not been well studied in other patient populations. Intravenous iron has many documented adverse drug reactions and the types and incidence of reactions differ based on the type of intravenous iron therapy used. In Canada, two forms of iron therapy are currently being used: Iron dextran marketed as Infufer or DexIron and iron sucrose marketed as Venofer are available. The general consensus in the literature is that the incidence of serious adverse reactions is relatively low approximately 0.6–0.7% with intravenous iron dextran. The objective of this retrospective chart review was to observe recorded adverse events of iron dextran (Infufer) and iron sucrose (Venofer) in our own non-hemodialysis patients. Methods: 240 non-hemodialysis adult outpatient charts were reviewed. Iron dextran (Infufer) or iron sucrose (Venofer) infusions were recorded from July 20, 2000 to July 13, 2004. For each chart, the patient age, sex, date of birth, past medical history, medications and allergies were recorded. The type of intravenous iron, if premedication was used, and a description of any reaction if it occurred was also recorded. Each adverse reaction was graded on causality, severity, and system classification based on WHO standards done by two investigators virtually blinded to the type of iron therapy used. Results: Of the 240 patient charts reviewed, there were a total of 403 intravenous iron infusions given within the study period. The age of the patients ranged from 19 to 91 with mean age 60.3 +/− 16.3. The majority of our patients were end-stage renal disease peritoneal dialysis patients 187 (78%). 11 (5%) had a history of connective tissue disease or vasculitis, 15 (6%) had a history of asthma, and 84 (35%) used an angiotension converting enzyme inhibitor (ACEI). Only 17 patients (38 total infusions) received premedication. The total number of adverse events of all descriptions was 103 (26%) of the 403 total intravenous iron infusions. This was equally distributed to males 40 out of 156 (26%) and females 63 out of 247 (26%). Of the 365 intravenous therapies not given premedication there were 89 (24%) adverse events. The total number of "certain severe allergic" reactions (CSAs) was 25/403 (6%). In iron dextran (Infufer) a total of 77/295 (26%) ADRs were noted and CSAs of 23/295 (8%). In iron sucrose (Venofer) there was a total of 26/105 (25%) ADRs and 2/105 (2%) CSAs. Of the 295 intravenous iron dextran infusions, 209 had a test dose given. Of these 209, there were 60 ADRs - 25 during the test dose (12%) and 35 (17%) after the test dose. Conclusions: Adverse events and CSAs in our adult outpatient non-hemodialysis patients receiving intravenous iron therapy with either iron dextran (Infufer) and iron sucrose (Venofer) are much higher than previously reported in the literature. There are more ADRs and CSAs in the iron dextran group than the iron sucrose group. Premedication did not appear to reduce ADRs. Having a normal test dose did not preclude to getting ADRs afterwards.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,003 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».