MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2549567777 · doi:10.1182/blood.v118.21.3477.3477

Genomic and Molecular Properties of Relapsed CNS Lymphoma Using Novel Primary Meningeal Lymphoma Cell Lines and Intracranial Xenografts,

2011· article· en· W2549567777 sur OpenAlexaff
Hua-Xin Gao, Shawn Anderson, Lingjing Chen, Cigall Kadoch, Byron Hann, Clifford A. Lowell, Colin C. Collins, James L. Rubenstein

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensUniversity of British Columbia
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLymphomaComparative genomic hybridizationPathologyCancer researchCerebrospinal fluidBiologyMedicineOncologyChromosomeGeneGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 3477 Background: There is a paucity of molecular information regarding the phenotype of relapsed aggressive CNS lymphoma, a condition for which there are few effective treatment options and, as a consequence, patient survival is often short. To test our hypothesis that the molecular properties of CNS lymphoma at relapse are distinct from those at diagnosis we pursued two parallel lines of investigation: 1) the genomic analysis of relapsed aggressive CNS lymphomas in comparison to newly diagnosed specimens and 2) the generation of novel CNS lymphoma cell lines derived from recurrent meningeal lymphomas isolated from the cerebrospinal fluid. We hypothesize that this approach will facilitate the identification of the underlying molecular determinants of tumour progression, novel genome-based biomarkers and therapeutic targets. Methods: We compared genome copy number using high-resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (array-CGH) and used bioinformatics to study a carefully selected cohort of tumours comprised of 10 newly-diagnosed primary CNS lymphomas (large B-cell) and 7 relapsed/refractory CNS lymphomas (5 large B-cell, 2 of transformed histology). We evaluated copy number aberrations that occurred in the tumour cohort as a whole as well as those that occur predominantly in relapsed cases. In addition, we established five novel lymphoma cell lines from relapsed cases, three of which were derived from meningeal lymphomas isolated from the cerebrospinal fluid and expanded upon intracranial implantation in NSG mice as patient-derived xenografts. Results: There was a trend for an increase in the proportion of copy number losses involving the short arm of chromosome 6 as well as overall gains on chromosome 12 among the relapsed cases. Significant DNA copy number gains for STAT6 were noted in 4/7 relapsed cases. We observed a significant number of deletions present in between 50–90% of newly diagnosed tumors that were absent in CNS lymphomas at relapse, suggestive of complex genomic remodeling during tumour evolution. In addition, a region with potential prognostic implications was identified at chromosome 19p.13.3 that was deleted in 57% of relapsed tumors but not in newly diagnosed cases. Three of the five relapsed large cell cases exhibited significant deletions, including one focal homozygous deletion, at chromosome 4q23.3–4q23.5, a region not previously shown to be deleted in large cell lymphoma (Lenz et al., PNAS, 2008). Both chromosomes 14 and 22 have copy number aberrations that occur in > 80% of all tumours as well as high frequency focal aberrations that appear linked to either good or poor prognosis. Significantly, the MTAP and CDKN2A genes at 9q21 are homozygously co-deleted in 18% of poor prognosis or relapsed patients. Notably, each of the orthotopic xenografts exhibited an ABC immunophenotype and were diffusely infiltrative with meningeal tropism. In fact, CNS metastasis to the meninges was recapitulated when the lymphoma cells were implanted in flank and spontaneously metastasized to brain, within three months post injection. In vitro chemotaxis assays demonstrated responsiveness of human meningeal lymphoma cells to CXCL-13 and SDF-1, chemokines postulated to contribute to the CNS tropism of NHL. Importantly, genomic aberrations identified in the parent tumours were retained when the relapsed meningeal lymphomas were serially passaged by intracranial implantation as xenografts, as evidenced by array-CGH. Conclusions: We believe that this study represents the first analysis of the biologic and genetic properties of relapsed CNS lymphoma. This analysis provides the first direct evidence that chemokines previously shown to be expressed in the CNS lymphoma microenvironment direct chemotaxis of meningeal lymphoma cells isolated from patients. This result is suggestive of a molecular mechanism which may be essential to CNS tropism. In addition, we have established the first in vivo model system of CNS lymphoma which retains the genomic properties of relapsed, refractory disease and which has significant potential for preclinical testing of novel therapeutic strategies. Supported by Leukemia and Lymphoma Society and NIH Grant CA13908301. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,004

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,210
Écart entre enseignants0,185 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetCNS Lymphoma Diagnosis and TreatmentTravaux en français237 207