Allogeneic Stem Cell Transplantation Is Associated with Long Term Disease Control in Chemo Sensitive Follicular Lymphoma Patients
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 2024 Introduction: Follicular lymphoma (FL) remains an incurable disease despite the use of immunochemotherapy or autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). Allogeneic stem cell transplantation (Allo-SCT) remains a viable treatment option in FL because of its associated graft versus lymphoma effect and potential to achieve long term disease control. There is limited data in literature regarding long term outcome of follicular lymphoma post allo-SCT. Patients and Methods: We identified a total of 52 patients with chemosensitive FL underwent allo-SCT at our centre between 1989 and 2009. 89% were in a chemosensitive remission at time of transplantation. The conditioning regimens included BUCY in 48 (92%) patients. GVHD prophylaxis was cyclosporine and methotrexate until 2009 and subsequently cyclosporine and mycophenolate mofetil. Patients undergoing matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplant received alemtuzumab. Results: There were 30 (58%) males and 22 (42%) females. The median age at BMT was 45 years (range:24–64) and the median number of prior chemotherapy regimens was 3 (range: 1–6). Fifteen (29%) of patients had only received <3 prior lines of chemotherapy while 36 (69%) had received more than 3 or more lines of therapy at time of transplantation. Prior chemotherapy regimens included anthracyclines in 46 (88%), platinum in 25 (48%), chlorambucil in 25 (46%) and purine analogues in 15 (29%). Twenty three (44%) patients had received prior rituximab and 11 (21%) had received prior radiation therapy (RT). Three (6%) patients had prior ASCT. The median time from diagnosis to transplant was 35 months (range 6–148). All transplants were myeloablative except for one reduced intensity conditioning (RIC) transplant. Forty-five (87%) of patients received matched related donor transplant whereas 2 (4%) received matched unrelated donor (MUD) transplant with the remainder being mismatched donor transplants. The graft source was bone marrow in 35 (67%) and peripheral blood stem cells in 16 (31%). Grade 1–2 acute GVHD was seen in 58% and grade 3–4 in 12%. Chronic GVHD was observed in 50% patients. There was a statistically significant higher incidence of acute GVHD in those who received BM versus PBSC as the graft source although the incidence of cGVHD was not different. Three (6%) patients had relapsed at a median follow up of 68 months. The median time to relapse post-BMT was 54 months (range: 13 – 94). At a median follow up of 68 months (all patients) and 94 months (those who are alive); 34 (65%) patients are alive and well. None relapse mortality was 30%. The overall survival (OS) of entire cohort at 60 months was 70% (Fig-1) and PFS was 68%. Patients, who had achieved chemosensitivity pre transplant, had statistically significant PFS (p=0.04) and OS (p=0.02). In multivariate analysis, number of chemotherapy regimens (</=2) was associated with improved OS (p=0.05). Conclusions: In summary, myeloablative allo-SCT in younger patients with chemosensitive FL has excellent potential for long-term disease control. With a median follow-up in survivors of 94 months, the NRM remains reasonable. Given inferior results in multiply treated patients, future strategies should identify high risk groups that should be considered for allo-SCT based strategies. Disclosures: Gupta: Incyte: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».