MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2551103180 · doi:10.1353/esc.2004.0078

The Woman and the Hour: Harriet Martineau and Victorian Ideologies by Caroline Roberts

2004· article· en· W2551103180 sur OpenAlexvenueaboutno aff
Mary Elizabeth Leighton

Notice bibliographique

RevueEnglish studies in Canada · 2004
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineSocial Sciences
ThématiqueCanadian Identity and History
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésIdeologyBiographyPoliticsPopularitySociologyArgument (complex analysis)LawArt historyHistoryClassicsMedia studiesPolitical science

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Laura M. Robinson Nipissing University Caroline Roberts. The Woman and [he Hour: Harriet Martineau and Victorian Ideologies. Toronto: U of Toronto P, 2002. Pp. 253. Cloth. $30.00. In 1855, convinced she was about to die, Harriet Martineau prepared her own obituary, began to write her autobiography, and waited for death to take her. It did not. Instead, Martineau lived for another 21 years, publish­ ing regularly on subjects as diverse as political economy, the 1791 Haitian revolution, and mesmerism; corresponding with Elizabeth Barrett, Jane Welsh Carlyle, and Florence Nightingale (among others); and campaign­ ing to repeal the Contagious Diseases Acts, which legislated often brutal gynecological examinations for any woman merely suspected of soliciting in English port towns. “Female Industry” (1859), Martineau's trenchant argument for pay equity published in the prestigious Edinburgh Review, aptly describes not only the women’s work she enumerates in that article but also her own modus vivendi. Long neglected, Martineau’s industry has increasingly attracted scholarly attention, not only among Victorianists working in the disci­ plines of English and History, but also among sociologists, some of whom have recently claimed her as “a founding figure in the discipline” (Hill and Hoecker-Drysdale ix) alongside Karl Marx, Max Weber, and Emile Durkheim. As Helena Znaniecka Lopata remarks, “Martineau’s recent ascendancy ... lags somewhat behind Martineau’s earlier popularity and fame among the literate public in England and America” (Hill and HockerDrysdale xv). Caroline Roberts makes clear, however, that Martineau’s “earlier popularity and fame” were always controversial. In her valuable new book, The Woman and the Hour: HarrietMartineau and Victorian Ide­ ologies, Roberts traces the controversies surrounding seven of Martineau’ s early publications, from 1832to 1851, ending her study just shy ofthe illness that prompted Martineau to pen her autobiography in 1855. Roberts reconstructs what she felicitously terms the “noisy reception” (4) of Martineau’s works, but eschews a strictly biographical focus. Mak­ ing use of historical analysis, exegesis, and theory, Roberts focuses on “Martineau’s texts and nineteenth-century culture rather than on her life” (6), “[situating] these texts historically in order to understand why they were controversial” (3). Given Martineau’s intellectual interests and commitBook Reviews | 239 ments, such historical contextualization entails a broad range of research, and Roberts cuts an admirable swath through nineteenth-century theories of political economy, the abolitionist movement, mid-Victorian medicine, and questions of historical representation and religious faith. Although critics have proclaimed the weakness of Martineau’s fiction (“Her fiction lacked personal commitment, she neither developed char­ acter nor evoked realism, her dialogues were wooden and didactic, and she relied upon the narrative to carry the action along” [38], states recent biographer Valerie Pichanick), Roberts is at her critical best on the novels. Her argument is most compelling in her chapters on Deerbrook (1839), a novel whose focus on its “apothecary-hero” (52) adumbrates Victorian fic­ tional representations of the medical profession such as Lydgate’ s medical career in George Eliot’ s Middlemarch (1871-72), and The Hour and the Man (1841), Martineau’ s novel about Toussaint L’Ouverture, the “self-proclaimed ‘Buonaparte of St. Domingo’(now Haiti)” (76). In these chapters, Roberts addresses previous criticisms, like Pichanick’ s, about the veracity of Martineau’s characterizations, reading these characterizations not as flat or inauthentic, but as strategic. Unlike critics who fault Martineau for failing to represent either historical verisimilitude or feminist possibilities for change, Roberts shows how Deerbrook’s “clinical perspective” (65) and The Hour and the Man’ s “description of Toussaint’ s crisis of identity and cultural dislocation” (89) actively disrupt early Victorian “middle-class ideological norms” (60). Historicizing both Martineau’ s language of char­ acterization and the genres of realism and historical romance, Roberts dem­ onstrates convincingly Martineau’ s serious engagement with contemporary issues—the increasing “professionalization of medical practitioners” and the status of “clinical medicine” (52), “the relation of women to medicine” (75), “problems surrounding the knowledge and representation of history” (77), and “the experience of history by the colonized subject” (77). Martineau s serious engagement with contemporary issues began in the early 1820s when she contributed regularly to the Monthly Repository, a politically radical Unitarian journal. The only paid contributor from 1829 to...

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,819
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,360

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0130,012
Communication savante0,0070,005
Science ouverte0,0010,004
Intégrité de la recherche0,0050,006
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0080,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,007
Tête enseignante GPT0,223
Écart entre enseignants0,216 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2004
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueEnglish studies in Canada→Même sujetCanadian Identity and History→Travaux en français237 207→