A Prospective, Observational Study of the Effectiveness and Safety of a Weekly Fixed Dose of Darbepoetin alfa with Current Practice Iron Management for the Treatment of Chemotherapy-Induced Anemia (CIA): A Subanalysis in Patients (pts) with Lymphoproliferative Malignancies (LPM).
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background: Darbepoetin alfa (Aranesp®) is a unique erythropoiesis-stimulating protein effective for the treatment of CIA when administered weekly (QW), every 2 weeks (wks) or every 3 wks. Fixed dosing of darbepoetin alfa is routinely used in clinical practice, but little data are available on its patterns of use and the impact of iron status on its effectiveness. Methods: This was a subanalysis of LPM pts included in a prospective, single-arm, multicenter study conducted in Spain. Pts were ≥ 18 yrs old, anemic (hemoglobin [Hb] ≤11 g/dL), scheduled to receive ≥ 12 wks of chemotherapy, and without iron, vitamin B12, or folate deficiencies. Pts were treated with darbepoetin alfa 150 mcg QW; the dose was to be doubled to 300 mcg QW if Hb increased <1 g/dL after 4 wks. Oral iron (200 mg QD) was recommended if transferrin saturation was ≤ 30%, transferrin was ≥ 400 mcg/dL, and/or ferritin was ≤ 300 mcg/L at any time during the study. The primary endpoint was hematopoietic response (Hb increase ≥ 2 g/dL or Hb ≥ 12g/dL in the absence of transfusions in the previous 28 days). Secondary endpoints included the percentage of pts with functional or absolute iron deficiency and its correlation with response rates, change in FACT-Fatigue score from baseline to end of treatment (EOT), and safety. Results: Of a total of 293 patients enrolled, 129 had LPM and were included in this analysis. Of the LPM patients, 55% were women, median age was 67.3 yrs (range: 20.6–88.4), median weight was 67 kg (range: 40.5–115.0). Eleven percent had Hodgkin’s disease, 33.9% had non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. 5.5% had chronic lymphocytic leukemia, and 49.6% had multiple myeloma. Most pts (80.5%) had baseline Hb between 9–11 g/dL; 19.5 % had Hb < 9 g/dL. Darbepoetin alfa was administered for a median of 16 wks (range:1–16). At wk 5, 25.6 % of pts had their dose doubled to 300 mcg QW. The observed hematopoietic response was 70.73% (95%CI: 62.69, 78.77). The proportion of pts transfused from wk 5 to EOT was 12.7%. During the study, 31.5% pts received oral iron, 10.3% developed absolute iron deficiency, and 8% had iron blockade. Mean (95% CI) FACT-Fatigue score increased from 34.1 (32.2, 35.9) to 40.0 (38.2, 41.8) (p<0.0001). Darbepoetin alfa was well tolerated with 2.4% of pts experiencing adverse events considered related to the study drug. Conclusions: darbepoetin alfa, given as a fixed dose, is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for CIA in pts with LPM. Darbepoetin alfa significantly improved health-related quality of life in this routine clinical practice setting.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,003 | 0,004 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».