Novel VWF Sequence Variations Identified in a Second Cohort of Index Cases Enrolled in the TS Zimmerman Program for the Molecular and Clinical Biology of VWD (ZPMCB-VWD).
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract The TS Zimmerman Program for the Molecular and Clinical Biology of von Willenbrand disease (VWD) is a multinational Program Project established to further the study of VWD in the United States and to contrast these studies with the studies initiated previously in the EU and Canada. In order to gain further insight into the clinical expression and penetrance of established types of VWD, we performed full gene DNA sequence analysis on VWD patients and normal controls. Previously, we reported new sequence variations identified from 50 VWD index cases and 113 normal controls in our study. This is an updated report of the sequence variations identified in a second cohort of 44 index cases with type 1, 2 and 3 VWD and 48 normal controls. Fourteen of these index cases have known mutations, 3 of which also have a second new mutation. Seven additional index cases had 1 or 2 new mutations. Three cases had new polymorphisms identified in our first cohort. Thirteen new mutations were identified in type 1 and type 3 patients including 3 nonsense mutations, 2 insertions, and 8 missense mutations. In cases where mutations were identified, 48% of the identified mutations were new mutations that have not been reported in the Sheffield VWF Mutation Database. A similar frequency of new mutation was observed in our first cohort (46%). In 20 of 44 (45%) patients with either type 1 or type 3 VWD, no sequence variations were identified in the VWF coding region. In our previous cohort, sequence variations were not detected in 30% of patients. Mutations in the non-coding region of the gene or mutations not detectable by DNA sequencing have not been ruled out in this group of patients. Since VWF polymorphisms are not well characterized in all exons and in different ethnic groups, full VWF laboratory testing and gene sequencing of over 160 normal controls was completed in our study. In our first report of the 113 normal controls, we identified 19 new sequence variations that were found mainly in African Americans. In the second cohort of 48 normal controls, we identified 2 new sequence variations (1087C>T and 1463C>G). The decreasing number of new sequence variations in the normal controls is in contrast to the index cases where a similar percent of new mutations were detected in both cohorts and may indicate that the majority of polymorphisms have been identified. Seven of 19 new sequence variations seen in the first cohort of normal controls were also found in the second cohort further supporting that they are polymorphisms. Previously, we identified six sequence variations that were previously reported as VWF mutations. In this study, the same six sequence variations (2220G>A, 2451T>A, 2771G>A, 3686T>G, 3692A>C and 6859C>T) were detected in the normal controls providing further evidence that these sequence variations are most likely polymorphisms. In addition, we detected two other reported mutations (6187C>T; P2063S and 2561G>A; R854Q) each in two normal controls. Our data indicate that sequencing of large numbers of normal controls is important to aid in differentiating mutations from polymorphisms. This study emphasizes the importance of understanding the ethnic-specific sequence variations in African Americans such that polymorphisms are not misidentified as mutations. Our data also suggest that the genetic variation in the VWF gene is extensive and that many low frequency mutations and polymorphisms remain to be identified. Differentiating polymorphisms from disease-causing sequence variations that affect the diagnosis of VWD and/or hemorrhagic risk is important but continues to be challenging in this bleeding disorder.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».