Provoking Conversations on Inquiry in Teaching Education, (2012) by Darren E. Lund, E. Lisa Panayotidis, Hans Smits, and Jo Towers
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Lund and his colleagues have published a rather unusual book.It is unusual in a number of ways, starting with the point that much of its contents have been presented and published previously over a 10-year period (2003 to 2012).There are four main sections of the book, and the first three appeared as previous conference presentations and later as journal articles.This is not hidden by the authors-indeed, very little seems hidden in this volume even when the possibility exists that what is written may reflect negatively on the writers-but they have indulged in the luxury of revisiting and revising their earlier work in light of later experience and deeper perspective.This is, in short, a kind of post-mortem examination of a teacher training program that no longer runs.The result is an in-depth examination of the ontology of a teacher training program and the struggles, personal and professional, encountered by some of the faculty members who created it.This book challenges the reader throughout and asks more questions than it answers to provoke readers' responses to the problems of educating teachers in a higher education setting.It challenges the reader in two senses.First, it challenges the reader to keep up with and understand the philosophical explanation of their ideas, the basis of these ideas, and the rationale for choosing them.At times the small volume becomes quite a dense read.Second, and more to the point of the authors' intentions, it challenges the reader to examine his or her own practice and goals in teaching by posing the provocations as points of departure for selfreflection.There are several threads running throughout the book and one of these is to prod the reader into becoming more self-aware of her or his own teaching practices, the intellectual rationale for one's approach to teaching, and what the effects of those practices might be on the students being taught.The book is divided into four broad areas, and as mentioned earlier, each of the first three sections had been published before in slightly different form.The first area is about curriculum (published in 2003), the second is that of narratives (published in 2006), and the third is about embodying inquiry (published in 2008).The final section is about the faculty's responsibility to history and discusses the authors' reactions to the closure of their program, their feelings about their experiment of training prospective teachers much differently from other teacher preparation programs, and reflections on the long term impact of their practices upon themselves, the profession, and the students who participated in this program.Each chapter has a respondent, who, with one exception, comes from outside the immediate teaching staff of the Faculty of Education at the
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,014 | 0,024 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,013 | 0,020 |
| Communication savante | 0,011 | 0,013 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,010 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,006 | 0,009 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».