Scoping Study on Socio-Economic Impacts of Tidal Energy Development in Nova Scotia: A Research Synthesis & Priorities for Future Action FINAL REPORT
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Executive Summary Details This report presents findings from stakeholder consultations on a renewable energy strategy for Nova Scotia. The results are compiled from hundreds of responses and a range of interest groups. The report presents recommendations on a) ideal energy source mix from renewables (wind and biomass are prominent), b)regulation, marketing and sector development framework to successfully develop a renewable strategy, including research and governmental department roles. The Utility and Review Board is seen as a key player in the effective integration of renewable energy into the power mix for Nova Scotia – the report suggests that the UARB mandate should be altered to include the development of FIT’s. Discussion / Comments: The report utilized survey data and interview and personal submission data from hundreds of Nova Scotians, to understand the current public perception and openness to renewable energy development. Serves as a good starting point for several socio-economic issues. Highlights many of the regulatory and business development issues associated with renewable energy development. There is a distinct focus on bio-mass as an option and tidal is not discussed, however hydro is marginally considered. Economic impacts are primarily focused on two groups 1) consumers and 2) small and community based energy developers. Key concerns include the cost transferred to consumers in the short and intermediate phase of renewable development from additional connections and converter stations, the cost of Feed In Tariffs and administrative work associated with site assessment and approval processes, development and payment of FIT’s. General sense is that low income households and SME’s will see increases in power prices, which may unfairly burden them. Discussion of a power poverty plan is discussed but only in loose terms, and the report suggests this is an issue the provincial government will have to investigate. Report (pg. 22) acknowledges that there will be different impacts for different groups in the population, but only suggests that this is an issue the government will have to address. Access to grid connectivity is mentioned as an issue if NSPI remains the primary decision maker in where and how those connections and converters are placed. Processes for approval need to be Other Information / Link: http://www.gov.ns.ca/energy/resources/EM/renewabl e/Wheeler-Renewable-Stakeholder-Consultation-
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».