Processing, properties and prospects for melt infiltrated (MI) SiCf-ceramic composites
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Ceramic materials exhibit superior mechanical properties at high temperatures. But, their use as structural components is severely limited because of their brittleness. Fiber-reinforced ceramic matrix composites (FRCMC), by incorporating fibers in ceramic matrices, not only exploit their attractive high-temperature strength but also enhance their toughness thereby rendering these attractive for many applications. Some of these applications require an understanding of the interrelationship among processing, fiber-matrix interface and mechanical properties both at room and elevated temperatures. Processing of FRCMC is typically done by chemical vapor infiltration (CVI), filament winding and hot-pressing, and polymer infiltration and pyrolysis (PIP) approaches. Most of these approaches do not lead to full-density unless external pressure is applied during processing. A novel approach of melt-infiltration (MI) is a promising technique for fabricating fully dense and net-shape SiC fiber-reinforced SiC composites. The processing of FRCMC by MI was pioneered, invented and developed for making fully dense, netand complex-shape silicon carbide (SiC) fiber-reinforced ceramic matrix composites [1]. The melt infiltration process technology exhibits processing-simplicity in which a porous preform consisting of carbon, SiC particulates and reinforcing SiC fibers is infiltrated with molten silicon (Si) for in-situ formation of SiC. This innovative processing is unique in that it is complete in a few minutes and produces net-shape and fully-dense composites inexpensively compared to other ceramic composite processes requiring applied pressure at very high temperatures for densification leading to shape change upon consolidation. The high temperature mechanical properties of MI composites may be limited by the properties of the fiber and Si-SiC matrix. In particular, the matrix properties depend on the amount of Si in the Si-SiC matrix phase. Therefore, Si-SiC composites containing 10-45 vol% Si were fabricated using melt-infiltration process and their microstructure and mechanical properties were measured between 1250-1550°C. Elastic modulus, strength, and creep behaviors were studied including the influence of the Si content on these properties. Elastic modulus and strength were shown to decrease with increases in both Si content and temperature. The composites containing large amounts of the continuous Si phase exhibited extremely low strength near the melting point of Si, while the composites containing small amounts of Si with a continuous SiC network retained 120 to 200 MPa strength even above the melting point of Si. The composites containing 10 and 20 vol% Si exhibited excellent creep resistance up to 1550 C, well above the melting point of silicon. Creep rates as low as 10 -10 to 10 -9 were obtained at stresses of 40 to 75% of the strengths. Microstructural examination of the crept composites with 36 and 45 vol% Si showed a correlation between the creep behavior and nucleation and linkage of cavity in the tensile side leading to tertiary creep and creep failure. These results will be discussed and presented. Biographical Sketch Dr. Raj N. Singh is currently Regents Professor, Williams Companies Distinguished Chair Professor, Director Energy Technologies Programs and Head of School of Materials Science and Engineering at Oklahoma State University (OSU). He received his Sc.D. degree from Massachusetts Institute of Technology, M.S. from University of Manitoba and B.S. from IIT Kanpur all in Materials Science and Engineering. He worked for several years at Argonne National Laboratory, GE-RD Albert Sauveur Achievement Award of ASM International (2016); Regents Professor (OSU 2015); Fellow of the ASM International (1996); Fellow of the American Ceramic Society (1992); Fellow of Graduate School (UC 2007); Whitney Gallery of Technical Achievers GE-CRD Publication Awards GECRD Patent Awards GE-CR&D: Bronze, Silver, and Gold Patent Medallions (1983, 1987, 1988). He also serves as member of editorial boards of 5 international journals.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».