MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2552578899 · doi:10.2118/182869-ms

Successful Integration and Interpretation of Different Sources of Data and Utilization of Seismic Attributes to Reduce the Level of Uncertainty in Infill Planning

2016· article· en· W2552578899 sur OpenAlexfundno aff
Hanan A. Razzaq

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineEngineering
ThématiqueReservoir Engineering and Simulation Methods
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesAGE-WELL
Mots-clésInfillGeologyDrillingFaciesBasementPetrologyPetroleum engineeringMining engineeringPaleontologyStructural basinCivil engineeringEngineering

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract The Greater Burgan Field is located onshore southern part of Kuwait and it is the world's largest clastic field. A low-relief anticlinal dome draped over a basement horst structure defines it. The primary producing reservoirs are the Wara and Burgan of Cretaceous age. Burgan field has been developed by drilling more than 1000 wells mainly targeting Burgan reservoir. Majority of the wells were planned and drilled in the low risk / low uncertainty part of the field, where the combination of the shallow structure and good quality reservoir facies allowed drilling till date. Since the wells density has increased in the dome area and the area congested with surface facilities, biggest challenge lies in identifying locations in the flank and rising flank part of the field. As the demand for oil increases rapidly and the need to sustain production from ageing wells is necessary, more new wells needed. Placing increased number of infill wells, while maintaining the proper reservoir management is a major challenge. In order to plan the wells in a way that maximizes the productivity and optimizes the economy; a study was conducted to analyse the density of the wells and the impact on reservoir behaviour. This comprehensive study targeted area "A" which is in the middle of the field, that is characterized by it's well developed facies, massive oil column and the lateral connectivity of the sand. Well correlations, OWC movement, production rates, density of the wells and the spacing were extensively analysed and a way forward for new infill and well planning was established. The established way forward used to plan the new infill and to design the trajectory of the wells. Based on that new locations were identified to be drilled away from our comfortable area ranging from low to high-risk locations, where the highly heterogeneous sands and the relatively low structural levels increased the level of uncertainty adding to that the chances of oil might be already drained by the offset up dip wells. In order to lower the level of uncertainty several seismic attributes were included in the planning phase. One of the powerful attributes used is the genetic inversion, which is adopting the same approach as the neural network. Two different seismic volumes differ in the size were trained using well logs data, then QCed with the existing wells. The smaller seismic volume was highly correlatable to the actual data and more reliable compared to the larger volume. The integrated volume was used in the locations identification and planning process. Subsequently all the identified locations released planned and drilled within one year. The results were promising as the encountered oil column in each well exceeded our expectations considering the high risk factor presented in each location. These findings has opened the door to investigate more and widely in the challenging or unestablished part of the field where good opportunities still exist in the structural trends/unestablished part of the field, where minor faults and various facies changes act as a barrier for oil accumulation. The aim of this paper is to shade some lights on the current challenges in the Brown field development and to emphasize on "No risk no gain". This comprehensive paper will illustrate the importance of proper data integration, the methodology used in the well planning and the successful post drilling results, the results of this study will guide on the future infill drilling.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,010
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Simulation ou modélisation · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: aucune
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,022

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,010
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0040,003
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0020,002
Science ouverte0,0010,002
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,108
Tête enseignante GPT0,343
Écart entre enseignants0,235 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSimulation ou modélisation
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetReservoir Engineering and Simulation MethodsTravaux en français237 207