MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2552828698 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.3630.3630

Conditional Deletion of the Hoxa Cluster in MLL-AF9 Is Incompatible with Leukemia Maintenance

2015· article· en· W2552828698 sur OpenAlexaff
Laura M. Kettyle, Ivan Grishagin, Glenda J. Dickson, Charles‐Étienne Lebert‐Ghali, Janet J. Bijl, Mary Frances McMullin, Terence R.J. Lappin, Ken Mills, Alexander Thompson

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueCancer Genomics and Diagnostics
Établissements canadiensUniversité de Montréal
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLeukemiaBiologyEctopic expressionProgenitor cellCancer researchHaematopoiesisStem cellHox geneFusion geneMolecular biologyGeneticsGeneGene expression

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction Hox gene expression is high in hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells (HSPCs), decreases during normal differentiation but remains elevated in leukemia subtypes. Polycomb repressor complexes and histone modifiers, e.g. Mixed Lineage Leukemia (MLL), are key regulators of Hox expression. MLL rearrangements, frequent in acute leukemia, are associated high HOXA expression. However, necessity for the HoxA cluster in MLL-leukemia maintenance is not fully elucidated. Methodology Ectopic overexpression of MLL-AF9 (MA9) in HSPCs in conditional compound transgenic mouse backgrounds MxCre+/HoxAflox/flox (MAFF) or HoxAflox/flox (AFlox) models resulted in increased colony formation and growth in liquid culture. Transformed colonies, serially re-plated (n=5) in methylcellulose and transplanted into sub-lethally irradiated recipient mice, resulted in primary leukemia. Initially, MAFF-MA9 leukemias were used to examine in vivo deletion of the HoxA cluster using intraperitoneal injections of Poly(I:C) to initiate an interferon response. To further examine the necessity for the HoxA cluster in disease maintenance, AFlox-MA9 leukemias were treated ex vivo with Cre-recombinase (MSCV-Cre-GFP) or vector control (MSCV-GFP), sorted based on GFP expression and used for gDNA-PCR, gene expression (Illumina BeadArray) and transplantation into sub-lethally irradiated recipient mice (500 cGy). Results Generation of MLL-AF9 leukemias in the MAFF background (MAFF-MA9) resulted in deletion of one HoxA cluster allele (HoxA+/-), validated by genomic PCR and gDNA sequencing from expanded single colonies (Figure 1) presumably due to viral-induced activation of the Mx1 promoter. PolyI:C treatment of these mice resulted in a modest extension in survival (1-2 days) compared to controls. Luciferase labelling and transplantation of MAFF-MA9 leukemias into NSG mice, followed by PolyI:C treatment, showed a measurable decrease in disease burden compared to control, however this did not correlate with overall survival. Direct treatment of MAFF-MA9 cells with interferon-α (in vitro) resulted in further deletion of the HoxA cluster (HoxA-/hypo) and significant reduction in colony formation compared to controls. Although non-leukemic MAFF HSPCs retained colony forming ability after complete HoxA cluster deletion (HoxA-/-) no HoxA-/- colonies were recovered from the interferon-α treated MAFF-MA9 cultures. Cre-recombinase-induced deletion of the Hoxa cluster from AFlox-MA9 leukemia cells was confirmed by gDNA-PCR and sequencing (Figure 1). Transplantation of Cre-treated AFlox-MA9 cells resulted in significant increased survival (P<0.002) by up to 74 days in recipient mice, compared to controls (Figure 2). Further examination of the leukemias that developed from these Cre-treated AFlox-MA9 cells demonstrated retention of one allele of the HoxA cluster, as a result of escapees. To gain insight into the molecular mechanisms underlying the HoxA requirement for MLL-AF9 maintenance, matched Cre- or control treated AFlox-MA9 samples used for the transplantation were further examined for differential gene expression by Illumina BeadArray analysis. Preliminary analysis of the data has confirmed significant reduction in the expression of HoxA cluster genes (a2, a4, a5, a7, a9) and increased expression of several genes involved in adhesion, differentiation or immune response (e.g. Itgb3bp, Mpo, Cxcl2). Further analysis including submission of gene signatures to the LINCS database (https://www.broadinstitute.org/software/cprg/?q=node/40) will be done to identify candidate small molecules that mimic HoxA deletion in MLL-AF9. Conclusion Together these data support a fundamental role for the HoxA cluster in MLL-AF9 maintenance indicating dependency for this leukemia subtype which may be exploited for therapeutic benefit. Figure 1. Deletion of Hoxa cluster validated by Sanger sequencing. The chromatograph (A) and sequence obtained (B) from PCR products generated from primers used to detect Hoxa cluster deletion with retention of the 5' UTR and 3' UTR regions of the Hoxa13 and Hoxa1 genes respectively. Figure 1. Deletion of Hoxa cluster validated by Sanger sequencing. The chromatograph (A) and sequence obtained (B) from PCR products generated from primers used to detect Hoxa cluster deletion with retention of the 5' UTR and 3' UTR regions of the Hoxa13 and Hoxa1 genes respectively. Figure 2. Deletion of the Hoxa cluster results in significant increase in survival of Cre-GFPHi AFlox-MA9 mice compared to GFPhi control mice (n=10). Significance as calculated by Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) Test is denoted *** = p<0.001. Figure 2. Deletion of the Hoxa cluster results in significant increase in survival of Cre-GFPHi AFlox-MA9 mice compared to GFPhi control mice (n=10). Significance as calculated by Log-rank (Mantel-Cox) Test is denoted *** = p<0.001. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,016

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,002

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,212
Écart entre enseignants0,204 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetCancer Genomics and Diagnostics→Travaux en français237 207→