MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2552984492 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.2861.2861

Panobinostat Plus Azacitidine in Adult Patients with MDS, CMML, or AML: Results of a Phase 2b Study

2015· article· en· W2552984492 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Guillermo Garcia‐Manero, Mikkael A. Sekeres, Miklós Egyed, Giuliana Alimena, Carlos Graux, Jamie Cavenagh, Huda Salman, Árpád Illés, Pierre Fenaux, Daniel J. DeAngelo, Reinhard Stauder, Karen Yee, Nancy Zhu, Je‐Hwan Lee, David Valcárcel, Alan Macwhannell, Zita Borbényi, Antje Wegener, Lucien Gazi, Suddhasatta Acharyya, Florence Binlich, Oliver G. Ottmann

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueAcute Myeloid Leukemia Research
Établissements canadiensUniversity of AlbertaPrincess Margaret Cancer Centre
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésPanobinostatMedicineAzacitidineChronic myelomonocytic leukemiaInternal medicinePhases of clinical researchInternational Prognostic Scoring SystemNeutropeniaMyelodysplastic syndromesBone marrowClinical endpointGastroenterologyOncologyToxicityClinical trial

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Azacitidine (AZA) is approved for the treatment of myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS), including chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML). AZA has improved the overall survival (OS) of patients (pts) with higher-risk MDS, however, to a median OS of 24.5 months (Fenaux P, et al. Lancet Oncol. 2009;10:223-232). Preclinical results showed that panobinostat (PAN), a pan-deacetylase inhibitor, acts synergistically with AZA. This is a phase 1b/2b study in adult pts with higher-risk MDS (International Prognostic Scoring System), CMML, or acute myeloid leukemia (AML) not eligible for stem cell transplant. In the phase 1b portion, the maximum tolerated dose was not reached, and the 30-mg PAN dose was chosen as the recommended phase 2 dose (Ottmann OG, et al. ASH 2011; [abstract 459]). Here we present the results from the randomized, 2-arm phase 2b portion, which was designed to assess efficacy of the combination of PAN + AZA compared with AZA alone. Methods: In phase 2b, pts were randomly assigned to receive PAN 30 mg on days 3, 5, 8, 10, 12, and 15 in combination with AZA 75 mg/m2 on days 1-7 in 4-week cycles, or AZA alone. Pts continued treatment until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or consent withdrawal. The primary endpoint was the composite complete response: complete response (CR) + morphologic CR with incomplete blood count + bone marrow CR (BM-CR). Results: In the phase 2b portion, 82 pts with MDS (n = 47), AML with < 30% bone marrow blasts (n = 22), or CMML (n = 13) were randomized to treatment with PAN + AZA (n = 40) or AZA (n = 42); 80 pts received ≥ 1 dose of treatment. Median pt age was 68 years (range, 44-81 years) in the PAN + AZA arm vs 72 years (range, 42-85 years) in the AZA arm. Among pts with MDS, 80.0% and 72.7% had refractory anemia with excess blasts in the PAN + AZA and AZA arms, respectively. Cytogenetics among pts with AML were also similar between treatment arms, with 33.3% of pts in the PAN + AZA arm and 30.8% of pts in the AZA arm presenting with unfavorable cytogenetics. Most pts in the total study population had not received prior treatment (87.5% in the PAN + AZA arm, 92.9% in the AZA arm). Median duration of PAN treatment was 20.5 weeks; median duration of AZA treatment was 23.4 weeks in the PAN + AZA arm and 16.9 weeks in the AZA arm. A higher proportion of pts achieved composite CR in the PAN + AZA arm than the AZA arm (27.5% vs 14.3%), including a higher proportion of pts in the PAN + AZA arm who achieved CR (15.0% vs 9.5%). However, the overall response rate (ORR; CR + BM-CR + partial response + hematologic improvement) was similar in the 2 treatment arms (37.5% vs 38.1%). The probability of survival at 1 year was also similar between the 2 arms: 60% (95% CI, 50%-80%) in the PAN + AZA arm vs 70% (95% CI, 50%-80%) in the AZA arm. Most pts had ≥ 1 adverse event (AE; PAN + AZA, 100% any grade and 97.4% grade 3/4; AZA, 95.2% any grade and 81.0% grade 3/4). The most common AEs (grade 3/4) with a higher incidence in the PAN + AZA arm, regardless of study drug relationship, were thrombocytopenia (55.3% vs 19.0%), neutropenia (42.1% vs 26.2%), anemia (21.1% vs 11.9%), and pneumonia (15.8% vs 11.9%). QT prolongation-related events were reported in 13.2% of pts in the PAN + AZA arm vs 7.1% in the AZA arm. Treatment discontinuation due to AEs was reported in 36.8% of pts in the PAN + AZA arm and 23.8% of pts in the AZA arm. There were 5 on-treatment deaths (13.2%) in the PAN + AZA arm (progressive disease, sepsis, septic shock, cardiac failure, and bronchopulmonary hemorrhage) and 2 (4.8%) in the AZA arm (septicemia and cardiopulmonary arrest). One death in the PAN + AZA arm was suspected to be treatment related (bronchopulmonary hemorrhage). Conclusions: PAN + AZA doubled the rate of composite CR compared with AZA in pts with higher-risk MDS, CMML, or AML not eligible for stem cell transplant. However, the ORR and 1-year survival rates were similar for the 2 arms, with higher rates of AEs and on-treatment deaths in the PAN + AZA arm. Notably, the dose and schedule of PAN used in this study differ considerably from the dose and schedule approved for use in multiple myeloma. Therefore, in MDS, CMML, and AML, further optimization of the PAN dose and schedule in combination with AZA is needed to improve the efficacy and tolerability of this combination. Disclosures Sekeres: Amgen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; TetraLogic: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Celgene Corporation: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Graux:Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Cavenagh:Novartis: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Janssen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Fenaux:Janssen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Honoraria, Research Funding; Amgen: Honoraria, Research Funding; Celgene Corporation: Honoraria, Research Funding. DeAngelo:Incyte: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; Pfizer: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; Novartis: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; BMS: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role; ARIAD Pharmaceuticals Inc.: Other: Consulting & Advisory Role; Amgen: Other: Consulting or Advisory Role. Yee:Oncoethix: Research Funding; Astex: Research Funding; Celgene: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding. Zhu:Celgene Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis Canada: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Janssen: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Valcarcel:Amgen: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; GSK: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau; Novartis: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Speakers Bureau. Borbenyi:Novartis: Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees. Wegener:Novartis: Employment. Gazi:Novartis Pharma AG: Employment. Acharyya:Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation: Employment. Binlich:Novartis: Employment. Ottmann:Astra Zeneca: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Bristol Myers Squibb: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ariad: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Novartis: Consultancy, Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai non randomisé · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,018

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0020,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0030,002
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0020,004
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0040,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,321
Écart entre enseignants0,286 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai non randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations7
Publié2015
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetAcute Myeloid Leukemia ResearchTravaux en français237 207