PWE-016 Faecal Calprotectin Has an Acceptable Sensitivity for Detecting Small Bowel Crohn’s Disease: Results from Real World Clinical Practice
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Introduction Faecal calprotectin ‘FC’ is a quick, non-invasive and inexpensive test proven to correlate well with colonic inflammation. It is used in our institution to also exclude active small bowel Crohn’s disease ‘CD’ although its reliability in such cases has recently been questioned. Using a higher cut-off FC value may exclude active disease in those with known inflammatory bowel disease with a higher specificity and reduce the number of false positives.1,2 The aim of this study was to assess whether FC compared to gold standard magnetic resonance enterography ‘MRE’ can reliably be used in small bowel CD as a screening tool to select those needing further investigation. Methods Data from all CD patients who had undergone MRE to assess for active small bowel CD between January 2012 to November 2015 were reviewed. Patients with a known or new diagnosis of ileal or ileo-caecal crohn’s (Montreal classification L1 phenotype) or ileo-colonic crohn’s (L3 phenotype) with endoscopic and histologically-proven quiescent colonic disease were included. Data was analysed using Mann-Whitney U testing. Results 194 MREs were performed for investigation of possible small bowel CD during the study period. 64 patients were included for analysis; L1 disease = 90.6% (58 patients), L3 = 9.4% (6 patients). 50% were female. The median age was 48 years (range 17–76 years). Median time between FC and MRE was 30 days (range 0–180 days). 35 patients (54.7%) were Montreal disease behaviour B1, 24 patients (37.5%) with B2 and 5 patients (7.8%) with B3. 4 patients (6%) had peri-anal involvement. 26 patients (41%) had previous Crohn’s-related resectional surgery. 39 patients (60.9%) had evidence of active small bowel CD at MRE. The median FC in the active CD group was 246 mg/kg (IQR 556) and 49 mg/kg for the inactive small bowel disease group (IQR 177.5); p < 0.0001. Table 1 shows results for sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value ‘PPV’ and negative predictive value ‘NPV’ of different FC cut-off values in detecting any degree of small bowel activity at MRE. Conclusion In this study we compared FC results to MRE to exclude or confirm active small bowel CD in real-world clinical practice. This data demonstrates that by using a cut-off value of 50 mg/kg, an acceptable sensitivity for detecting active small bowel CD is achievable. However, at this cut-off value, specificity is low; nevertheless using FC will still reduce demand for MRE. References 1 F. Fascì-Spurio, A. Chiappini, V. Buonocore, S. Cannizzaro, Z. Maddalena, F. Maccioni, P. Vernia. (2014) Faecal calprotectin concentrations in Crohn’s patients with ileal disease location: correlations with disease activity as seen by MRI enterography. European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. 2 MF Hale, K Drew, ME McAlindon, AJ Lobo, R Sidhu. (2015). PTU-054 Faecal calprotectin in patients with suspected small bowel crohn’s disease: correlation with small bowel capsule endoscopy. Gut2015;64:A83. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2015-309861.169 Disclosure of Interest None Declared
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,007 | 0,023 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».