Factor Va Cofactor Activity Is Dependent on the Interaction of Prothrombin with the Membrane Surface.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Activation of human prothrombin (Pro) occurs because of two sequential cleavages in prothrombin by membrane-bound factor Xa (fXa) (Arg271 followed by Arg320, prethrombin 2 pathway). However, the catalytic efficiency of membrane-bound fXa is poor in the absence of factor Va (fVa), and the overall reaction is incompatible with efficient thrombin formation required for the timely arrest of bleeding. Binding of fVa to fXa on a membrane surface in the presence of divalent metal ions results in the formation of prothrombinase. This complex catalyzes the activation of Pro following the opposite pathway (cleavage at Arg320 followed by Arg271, meizothrombin pathway). This pathway results in a dramatic increase in the catalytic efficiency of fXa. It is well established that initial cleavage of prothrombin at Arg320 is strictly dependent on the incorporation of fVa into prothrombinase and that the increase in the overall efficiency of the enzymatic reaction is solely credited to the interaction of the cofactor molecule with discrete amino acid residues from both membrane-bound enzyme and membrane-bound substrate. Thus, the activity of fXa within prothrombinase is controlled by the presence of the soluble, non-enzymatic cofactor, fVa. We have shown that a pentapeptide with the sequence DYDYQ specifically inhibits this pathway. It has been also established that Hir54–65(SO3−) is a specific inhibitor of prothrombinase. To understand the role of fVa within prothrombinase at the molecular level, we have studied thrombin formation by prothrombinase in the presence of various Pro-derived fragments alone or in combination. Activation of prethrombin 1 is slow with cleavages at Arg320 and Arg271 occurring with similar rates. Addition of purified fragment 1 to prethrombin 1 accelerates both the rate of cleavage at Arg320 and thrombin formation. Both reactions were inhibited by Hir54–65(SO3−) while DYDYQ had no significant inhibitory effect on prethrombin 1 cleavage in the absence or presence of fragment Similarly, activation of prethrombin 2 by prothrombinase, which is notably slow and inhibited by Hir54–65(SO3−), is not affected by DYDYQ. Addition of purified fragment 1·2 to prethrombin 2 accelerates the rate of cleavage at Arg320 by prothrombinase resulting in a rate of thrombin formation comparable to the rate of Pro activation by prothrombinase. This addition results in a significant inhibition of thrombin formation by DYDYQ and is concurrent with the elimination of the inhibitory effect of Hir54–65(SO3−) on the same reaction. Finally, a membrane-bound ternary complex composed of prethrombin 2/fragment 1·2/Hir54–65(SO3−) is inhibited by DYDYQ. These data demonstrate that DYDYQ and Hir54–65(SO3−) inhibit prothrombinase activity through different mechanisms because the peptides most likely interact with distinct portions of prethrombin Altogether, the data demonstrate that membrane-bound fragment 1 is required to promote optimum fVa cofactor activity which in turn is translated by efficient initial cleavage of Pro by prothrombinase at Arg320. Therefore, our findings put in the context of the literature suggest that fVa incorporation into prothrombinase equalizes the rate of both Pro activating cleavages, and it is the interaction of membrane-bound fragment 1 with fVa and/or fXa within prothrombinase that promotes a further accelerating effect of the rate of cleavage at Arg320, resulting in meizothrombin generation.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».