Unexpected and Sustained Symmetry in the Repopulation Programs Displayed by Clonally Amplified Hematopoietic Stem Cells.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Heterogeneity in progeny output by individual pluripotent hematopoietic cells is a well documented but poorly understood paradigm. Importantly, the extent to which this functional heterogeneity is pre-determined by intrinsic mechanisms that specify distinct programs, as opposed to conditions that result in a series of stochastic events, is still debated. The prospective isolation of phenotypically defined subpopulations with more restricted behaviors has lent recent support to the concept of predetermined hierarchies with preset, but alternative pathways of lineage restriction and differentiated cell output. Here we have used highly purified starting populations to compare the long-term cell output dynamics of individual multipotent repopulating cells in sublethally irradiated W41/W41 mice transplanted with single Ly-5 congenic CD45midlin−Rho−SP adult mouse bone marrow cells (158 mice) or their clonal progeny generated after 4 days in vitro in 300 ng/ml SF, 20 ng/ml IL-11 and 1 ng/ml Flt3-L (194 mice). WBC samples collected 4, 8, 12, 16, and 24 weeks post-transplant were analyzed for donor contributions to the myeloid (GM) and lymphoid (B and T) lineages. In 49 of the 158 mice (31%) and 44 of the 194 mice (23%), the cells produced in vivo contributed ≥1% of all the WBCs present at ≥16 weeks. The overall and lineage-specific contributions to the WBCs in each recipient mouse varied widely both over time post-transplant and between mice. However, examination of the ratio of the donor contributions to the myeloid and lymphoid lineages (GM:B+T) in each mouse at 16 weeks post-transplant allowed 4 patterns to be readily identified: α and β with GM:B+T ratios of ≥2 and 0.25–2, respectively; γ, with a GM:B+T ratio of <0.25 including a ≥1% contribution to both lymphoid and myeloid lineages at 16 weeks; and δ, also with a GM:B+T ratio of <0.25, but with contribution only to the lymphoid lineages at this time. Secondary transplants performed after 24 weeks showed long-term repopulation (≥16 weeks) of most recipients of type α and β progeny (10/11 and 11/12, respectively) but none of the recipients of type γ and δ progeny were repopulated (0/6 and 0/17, respectively). Interestingly, the variation over time in both the overall and lineage-specific contributions was remarkably similar in pairs of secondary recipients injected with cells from the same primary donor. In addition, the lineage contribution ratios seen in the secondary recipients tended to recapitulate that of the primary donors (i.e., α or β), and these trends remained obvious when tertiary transplants were performed. Preservation of stem cell programming was also evident from sequential analyses of multiple mice injected with aliquots of the same clones generated in vitro after 10 days from single CD45midlin−Rho−SP cells. Very similar patterns of total and lineage-specific contributions were again observed amongst the different recipients of cells from the same clones. Collectively, these findings indicate that by early adult life hematopoietic stem cells have acquired intrinsically fixed patterns of lineage specification that can be stably transmitted through many self-renewal generations.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».