MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2554516760

COMPARISON OF 3D VOLUME RENDERING TO VOLUMETRIC SLICING OF CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY FOR NAVIGATION OF PERCUTANEOUS SCAPHOID FIXATION

2012· article· en· W2554516760 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Erin J. Smith, Hisham Alsanawi, Braden Gammon, P.J. St. John, David R. Pichora, R.E. Ellis

Notice bibliographique

Revuenon disponible
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation
Établissements canadiensQueen's University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésVolume renderingCone beam computed tomographyCadaverMedicineDrillFixation (population genetics)Computer visionComputer scienceArtificial intelligenceRendering (computer graphics)OrthodonticsComputed tomographyAnatomyRadiologyEngineering
DOInon disponible

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Primary internal fixation of uncomplicated scaphoid fractures is growing in popularity due to its advantages over conventional cast fixation. Performing the procedure percutaneously reduces the risk of infection and soft tissue damage, but can be tricky because of the small size and complex three-dimensional (3D) shape of this bone. Computer-assisted navigation has been an invaluable tool in other pin insertion procedures. This in-vitro study aimed to evaluate two different rendering techniques for our navigation interface: (i) 3D volume rendering of the CBCT image to show digitally-reconstructed radiographs of the anatomy, and (ii) volume-slicing, analogous to CT-images. As the shape of the scaphoid is highly variable, a plastic model of the wrist was constructed in order to provide consistency that would not be possible in a cadaver-based study. The plastic model featured a removable scaphoid such that a new one was replaced between trials. Three surgeons each performed eight trials using each of the two navigated techniques (yielding a total of 48 trials for analysis). Central placement of scaphoid fixation has been linked with mechanical stability and improved clinical outcomes, thus the surgical goal was to place a K-wire to maximise both depth from the surface and length of the drill path. The wire was drilled through the scaphoid, from distal to proximal, allowing for post-trial analysis of the drill path. A ceiling-mounted OptoTrak Certus camera (Northern Digital Inc., Canada) and a floor-mounted isocentric 3D CBCT C-arm (Innova 4100, GE Healthcare, France) permitted a registration transformation between the tracking and imaging systems to be computed preoperatively, before each trial, using a custom calibration device. Optical local coordinate reference bodies were attached to the wrist model and a custom drill guide for tracking with the Certus camera. During each trial, a 3D spin image of the wrist model was acquired, and rendered according to the technique under study. For 3D volume rendering, the spin image was rendered as a digitally-reconstructed radiograph (DRR) that could be rotated in three dimensions. In the planning phase, the surgeon positioned a desired drill path on the images. Anterior-posterior and lateral views of the 3D volume rendering were used for navigation during the drilling phase. The real-time orientation of the drill guide was shown relative to these images and the plan on an overhead. For volume-sliced (VS) navigation, the spin image was volume-rendered and sliced along the principal planes (axial, coronal, sagittal) for planning. A slider interface allowed the surgeon to scroll through the slices in each of the planes, as if they were looking at individual CT slices. Once the desired drill path was positioned, the volume-sliced views were reconfigured to show slices along the oblique planes of the planned path for navigation. Following all trials, model scaphoids with wire intact were imaged using CT with a slice thickness of 0.625 mm. The CT series were segmented and used to construct 3D digital models of the wire and drilled scaphoid. Algorithms were developed to determine the minimum distance from the centerline of the wire and the scaphoid surface, and to compute the length of the drill path. Screw breach should be avoided as it disrupts the articular surface and may lead to a sequela of cartilage deterioration and osteoarthritic changes. The shortest distance measure was extrapolated to assess whether a standard fixation screw (Accutrak Mini, 1.78 mm radius) would have breached the scaphoid surface. There were three screw breaches noted in the 3D DRR trials, while only one occurred using volume-slicing. The minimum distance from the centerline of the wire to the scaphoid surface can also be thought of as a “safe zone” for screw breach. Although no difference in the mean distance (μ) was noted between groups (μDRR = 2.3 mm, μVS = 2.2 mm), the standard deviation (σ) was significantly higher for the DRR trials (σDRR = 0.50 mm, σVS = 0.37 mm, p < 0.1), suggesting a higher reliability of central placement using VS for navigation. In contrast, the length of the drill paths were significantly longer for the DRR trials (μ = 28.7 mm, σ = 0.66 mm) than for VS-navigation (μ = 28.3 mm, σ = 0.62 mm) at p < 0.1. The surgical goal was to pick a path that maximised both the length of the path, as well as the minimum distance from the scaphoid surface. Algorithms were developed to find the paths that would maximise: (i) the length and (ii) the distance from the surface of the model scaphoid used in this study. The maximum possible length was 29.8mm (with a minimum distance of 2.2mm from the scaphoid surface), and the maximum distance was 3.3mm (with a length of 27.5mm). Therefore, the set of optimal drill paths had length > 27.5 mm, and distance > 2.8 mm. Of the DRR-navigated trials, 11 were below the minimum optimal depth, and only one trial was below the optimal length; 13 of the 24 trials (54%) were of both optimal length and depth. Of the VS-navigated trials, nine were below the minimal optimal distance, and four were below the minimum optimal length; 11 out of 24 trials (46%) were within both the optimal length and depth. From this comparative study, we conclude that VS-navigation was superior in locating a central location for the fixation wire, while DRRs were superior in maximising the depth of the drill path. Thus, we propose a hybrid interface, incorporating both volume-slicing and DRRs, in order to maximise the effectiveness of navigation for percutaneous scaphoid pinning.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,002
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,009
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,011

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0020,009
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,027
Tête enseignante GPT0,311
Écart entre enseignants0,284 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2012
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même sujetOrthopedic Surgery and Rehabilitation→Travaux en français237 207→