Point: AML Stem Cells are Immature, Rare, and Targets for Curative Therapy in AML.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract SCI-34 The cellular and molecular basis for the heterogeneity that exists within the individual cells that make up a tumour is not well understood. There is clear evidence from the historical literature of human experimentation, the vast majority of leukemia blasts are post-mitotic and generated from a rapidly proliferating fraction of <5% of total leukemic blasts. These same studies also established that a rare subfraction of blasts were quiescent and only entered cell cycle in the order of weeks or months. The cancer stem cell (CSC) model postulates that such heterogeneity arises because the tumour is organized as a cellular hierarchy sustained by a CSC at the apex. If a tumour is homogeneous the CSC model would not apply. By employing the principles of stem cell biology, first worked out in hematopoiesis, of clonal assays and prospective cell purification, there is solid evidence that human AML follows a CSC model. LSCs are the only AML cells capable of self-renewal while still generating rapidly proliferating progenitors and terminal leukemic blasts. Our studies have also demonstrated that LSCs are not functionally homogeneous but, like the normal hematopoietic stem cell (HSC) compartment, comprised of distinct hierarchically arranged LSC classes. Distinct LSC fates derive from heterogeneous self-renewal potential. Finally, many LSC appear to be quiescent. Thus, the AML clone is organized as a hierarchy that originates from LSC, which produce AML-CFU and leukemic blasts. AML is organized as a cellular hierarchy sustained by LSCs at their apex. The rare occurrence, generally dormant nature, and abnormal apoptotic response of LSCs are all properties that may render them resistant to conventional chemotherapeutics that target proliferating cells. In addition, minimal residual disease occurrence and poor survival have been attributed to high LSC frequency at time of diagnosis in AML patients. Although there are a number of well known problems with xenotransplant assays, recent improvements to this model have been employed to assess both the frequency of LSC in a cross section of AML samples as well as the nature of the cell surface phenotype of the LSC. Collectively this research has shown that the LSC frequency can vary over many orders of magnitude from 1% to <1 per 106, with some genetic AML subtypes such as MLL leukemias possessing the highest LSC frequency. Thus even with the most optimized assay system they represent a rare subfraction of AML blasts for most forms of leukemia. The properties of AML-LSC make them especially resistant to standard cytoablative therapeutics, so LSC-targeted therapies are clearly needed to improve long term survival for this dismal disease. A number of new therapeutics are being developed and evaluated in the xenotransplant assays and several are now moving into clinical trial. With translation of lab-based research into the clinic, the next several years will begin to provide definitive answers to the most vexing question the continues to surround the whole field of cancer stem cells: while the importance of CSC are clearly seen in numerous xenotransplant models of leukemic and solid tumours, how relevant are they in the human disease? Dick JE. Stem cell concepts renew cancer research. Blood 2008;112:4793-807. Disclosures Dick: Roche: Research Funding; CSL Ltd: Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,021 | 0,006 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».