MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2554665350 · doi:10.1182/blood.v118.21.987.987

A miRNA Risk Score for the Prediction of Response to Lenalidomide in Multiple Myeloma (MM) Patients

2011· article· en· W2554665350 sur OpenAlexaff
Paola Neri, Andrew R. Belch, Jordan Johnson, Kathy Gratton, Li Ren, Peter Duggan, Adnan Mansoor, Douglas A. Stewart, Nizar J. Bahlis

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments
Établissements canadiensUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of Calgary
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésLenalidomidemicroRNAMultiple myelomaOncologyInternal medicineBiologyCancer researchGene expression profilingCohortMedicineGene expressionBioinformaticsGeneGenetics

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 987 Background: Lenalidomide has demonstrated clinical activity in patients with newly diagnosed or relapsed MM, however nearly a third of relapsed patients fail to respond to it. While preclinical studies have reported variable biomarkers and pathways (Wnt-GSK3b-beta catenin; eIF4E-C/EBPb-IRF4; Cul4A-DDB1-Cereblon) as mediating the anti-MM effects of IMiDs, a comprehensive risk score for prediction of response to Lenalidomide is lacking. MiRNA are highly preserved non-coding RNAs that act post-transcriptionally to regulate gene expression by binding to the 3'UTR of mRNAs. To date studies have reported selective miRNAs expression in plasma cells at different stages of the clonal disease progression (MGUS to MM), correlated miRNA expression with distinct MM molecular subgroups and demonstrated a genome-wide elevated expression of miRNAs in high-risk MM. Herein, we have conducted a comprehensive profiling of miRNA and mRNA expression in Lenalidomide treated MM patients and established a miRNA-based risk score that is predictive of response to therapy. Methods and results: We have postulated that a miRNA signature in MM is predictive of response to Lenalidomide based therapy. To test this hypothesis, we analyzed in a testing cohort (n=20) the miRNA and mRNA signatures of Lenalidomide sensitive “S” and resistant “R” MM patients. In order to account for the role of the bone marrow environment in this disease, RNAs were extracted from 1mm punched biopsies of non-sorted and plasma cells enriched areas of the bone marrows collected immediately prior to initiating Lenalidomide. MiRNAs were hybridized to the miRNA Affymetrix gene-chip and raw miRNA expression values were log2 transformed and normalized (miRNA-QC tool, Affymetrix). Comparison of normalized miRNAs expression in “S” versus “R” patients (Anova testing) identified 29 differentially expressed miRNAs (Fold change < −2 or > 2 with a p value and FDR <0.01) between these two groups. In order to establish a risk score (RS) for prediction of response to Lenalidomide, we performed a stepwise canonical discriminant analysis with response to Lenalidomide as grouping variable and the 29 differentially expressed miRNA as independent variables. The discriminant analysis identified a RS based on the log2-scale expression of 4 miRNAs using the following equation: RS= ((1.068*hsa-miR-21) + (1.367*hsa-miR-26b) +(1.761* has-miR-3147)+(3.523*has-miR-34a) – 36.692). This univariate summary (ie, RS) of the miRNA expression profiles for each patient enabled accurate (100%) prediction of response to Lenalidomide. All patients with a RS < 0 were sensitive to Lenalidomide with a mPFS and mOS of 21.4 and 39.5 months respectively. In contrast, all patients with a RS > 0 were resistant to Lenalidomide with a mPFS and mOS of 4.1 and 24 months respectively. Validation of this RS was also performed in an independent cohort (n=20) of MM patients treated with lenalidomide. In this validation cohort the miRNA RS accurately predicted response to therapy in 90% of the cases. The mPFS and mOS were 32.0 and 43.1 months in patients with a RS < 0 (predicted as responders) as opposed to a mPFS and mOS of 6.6 and 7.6 months in patients with a RS > 0 (predicted as non-responders) (Figure below). mRNA profiling (U133A Plus2 array chip) was also performed on the plasma cells enriched bone marrow sections with 554 genes identified as differentially expressed (Fold change < −2 or > 2 with a p value and FDR <0.005) between Lenalidomide S and R patients. Using the TargetScan miRNA target mRNA prediction tool, combinatory analysis of miRNA and mRNA expression profiles of these MM patients identified positive and negative correlations (p<0.05) between differentially expressed miRNA and mRNAs. Lastly in a multivariate Cox regression analysis that included ISS stage, FISH cytogenetics ((del17p and t(4;14)) and the 4 miRNA RS, these variables were independent predictors of survival post Lenalidomide based therapy. Conclusion: We believe that this miRNA Risk Score provides a robust method of predicting sensitivity or resistance to Lenalidomide in MM patients and warrants further validation in a larger prospective study. The biological functions of these 4 miRNAs and their regulation of MM cells sensitivity to Lenalidomide is currently being investigated in vitro in a library of MM cell lines. Disclosures: Neri: Celgene: Honoraria, Research Funding. Belch:Celgene: Research Funding; Onyx: Research Funding. Bahlis:Celgene: Honoraria, Speakers Bureau.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,002
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,006

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,059
Tête enseignante GPT0,283
Écart entre enseignants0,223 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations5
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetMultiple Myeloma Research and Treatments→Travaux en français237 207→