Incidence and Predictors of Bleomycin Pulmonary Toxicity in Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) Patients Treated with Adriamycin, Bleomycin, Vinblastine and Dacarbazine (ABVD),
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 3643 Background: Bleomycin pulmonary toxicity (BPT) is a well described complication of bleomycin-containing chemotherapy regimens, with a reported incidence of 0–46%. Prior data in Hodgkin Lymphoma (HL) have been heterogeneous with some series reporting inferior survival in patients (pts) with BPT. We reviewed the outcome of ABVD treated pts at our institution with the goals of determining the incidence and risk factors for BPT, as well as the effect of BPT on overall and progression-free survival (OS and PFS). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 253 newly diagnosed pts with HL treated with ABVD at Princess Margaret Hospital from 1999–2009. Pts typically received 3 cycles of ABVD + IFRT for localized disease and 6–8 cycles for advanced stage or bulky disease. BPT was defined by the presence of symptoms (fever, cough, dyspnea), bilateral interstitial infiltrates on CT, and no evidence of infection. Predictors of BPT were identified in bivariate followed by multivariable logistic regression analysis. Kaplan-Meier estimates as well as Cox proportional hazards model were used to compare OS and PFS between groups. Results: Median age at HL diagnosis was 34 years (range 17–77); 129 (51%) were male, 49% had advanced stage disease, while localized presentations were favourable: 25% and unfavourable: 26% by NCIC criteria. 77 (30%) patients had a smoking history, 121 (48%) received thoracic radiation for HL and 27(11%) had underlying lung disease. BPT was observed in 29 (11%) patients, with a median onset time of 4 months from initiation of ABVD. Bleomycin was discontinued in 20/29 patients (69%) and 19/29 (66%) patients were treated for BPT with corticosteroids (median duration: 11 weeks (range 3–23)). On bivariate analysis, risk factors associated with increased risk of BPT include age ≥45 years (55% BPT vs 28% non-BPT, p=0.003), G-CSF use (90% vs.71%, p=0.043), and ECOG PS ≥2 (24% vs.10%, p=0.02). On multivariable analysis, age ≥45 years (HR=3.1, p=0.005) and G-CSF use (HR=3.5, p=0.045) remained as independent predictors of BPT development. There was no sufficient evidence of a statistically significant difference in pulmonary risk factors in patients with or without BPT. There was a trend towards lower baseline serum albumin in BPT group, although this did not reach statistical significance (p=0.052). At a median follow-up of 5 years, OS and PFS for all 253 pts were 88% and 82%. 30 pts died due to disease progression (15), treatment-related complications (5; 3 secondary malignancies), and other causes (4). Only 3 deaths occurred among the 29 pts with BPT (2 unrelated, 1 from concomitant BPT and sepsis with multiorgan failure). On multivariable analysis, age≥60 (HR 3.7 for OS, p=0.003; HR 2.5 for PFS, p=0.019) and ECOG PS≥2 (HR 3.1 for OS, p=0.009; HR 3.0 for PFS, p=0.003) were identified as predictors of inferior survival in advanced stage HL. Increased age was associated with inferior OS (HR 1.05, p=0.031) and PFS (HR 1.06, p=0.004) in limited stage HL. Development of BPT had no significant impact on CR (97% BPT vs. 89% in non-BPT, p=0.77), 5-year OS (93% vs. 87%, p=0.80) or PFS (83% vs. 82%, p=0.98) in multivariate analysis. Bleomycin discontinuation (66 pts, 27%; 20 due to BPT, 5 skin toxicity, 36 non-BPT respiratory symptoms, 5 other) had no impact on CR rate (88% vs. 91%, p=0.19), 5-year PFS (81% vs. 83%, p=0.98), or 5-year OS (85% vs. 89%, p=0.89). Conclusions: The incidence of BPT in this series is low at 11%. Our study confirms advanced age and G-CSF usage as risk factors for BPT and identified poor PS as an independent predictor of BPT. In contrast to some prior studies, we demonstrate similar OS and PFS for pts who developed BPT or had bleomycin discontinued. This may be attributed to earlier recognition and management for suspected BPT in the past decade. Disclosures: Kukreti: Celgene: Honoraria; Ortho Biotech: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Crump:Millennium Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Ortho Johnson & Johnson: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding; Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees; Pfizer: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».