Developing a voluntary emergency health record for children in Ontario: a significant step towards a lifetime health record
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
The province of Ontario in Canada is planning to create a longitudinal electronic health record (EHR is a lifetime record of an individual's key health history and care within the health system) for each of its 12 million inhabitants. The province has funded the development of the electronic Child Health Network (eCHN), an advanced example of an integrated and shared EHR from multiple systems at multiple sites for the benefit of patients and clinicians. eCHN offers the province the foundation of a voluntary emergency health record for 1. Background The purpose of this paper is to examine the possible steps that can be taken in the Canadian province of Ontario towards the development of an emergency health record for and adults by building on the early success of a partial shared and integrated health record for This paper will first outline the history of the current record and then propose a possible approach to using that record as a platform for a province-wide emergency health record. The current record is only a partial but a useful one. It provides four of the key data domains that health care providers consider to be amongst the most essential: first, admission, discharge and transfer data; second, transcribed reports, such as clinic notes, operative notes and discharge summaries; third, laboratory reports; and, fourth, radiology reports and images. These records originate in various health information systems that are located at various hospitals throughout the province and are sent, in real time, to a central repository, from which they can be viewed by authorised health care providers. The stated aim of the provincial government is to build an emergency health record for and adults. This record, eventually, should be available to any physician or other health care provider who may be called upon to look after a patient whose health record is not immediately available at that location. It is believed that often the history of the patient is crucial for the provision of proper care and the avoidance of errors that could hurt, rather than help, the patient. Building such a record is expected to be a lengthy and costly enterprise. So far, the government has funded the establishment of a network that is providing a partial record and is moving in the direction of the province-wide, comprehensive record. The network is called the electronic Child Health Network (eCHN). It links 10 health care provider centres (six hospitals on eight sites, including a tertiary acute care hospital, a tertiary chronic and rehabilitation hospital, four community hospitals that serve as regional paediatric centres, a children's treatment centre, and a home nursing agency). It is currently funded to add at least 16 more hospitals and several other health care provider organisations in the coming year. The Province of Ontario is often called Canada's engine of growth. It is by far the largest of the country's 10 provinces, with a population of about 12 million people. It is estimated that about 25 per cent of the total population or about 3 million people are under 19 years of age and are, therefore, considered, by definition, to be paediatric patients or children. (Few of those between the ages of 14 and 18 would consider themselves to be children but, as far as the healthcare system is concerned, they are.)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,014 | 0,032 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,003 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,008 | 0,003 |
| Communication savante | 0,008 | 0,006 |
| Science ouverte | 0,003 | 0,006 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,006 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».