MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2555995186 · doi:10.1182/blood.v116.21.5166.5166

Comparison of Overt and Cryptic Labile Plasma Iron In Thalassemia Patients In Israel and Gaza-Palestine

2010· article· en· W2555995186 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
William Breuer, Hussam Ghoti, Hesham El Jeadi, Ada Goldfarb, Eliezer A. Rachmilewitz, Z. Ioav Cabantchik

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2010
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésChemistryTransferrinChelation therapyChelationAntioxidantThalassemiaSiderophoreBiochemistryInternal medicineMedicineInorganic chemistry

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 5166 Background. Systemic iron overload (SIO) is characterized by persistently high levels of plasma iron that often surpass transferrin's (Tf) binding capacity and generate chemical forms identified as non-Tf bound iron (NTBI). These forms have been perceived as: a. clinically important indicators of SIO per se and of impending organ damage, because cells chronically exposed to iron overloaded plasma attain iron levels and ensuing ROS formation that override their antioxidant capacities and b. as pharmacological targets for chelation and thereby of prevention of tissue iron overload. However, NTBI determination in the clinical setting has been confounded by the chemical heterogeneity of iron forms found in fluids like plasma/sera of SIO patients, the presence of residual amounts of undefined chelates or chelators and the need to dislodge NTBI from native ligands with agents that facilitate its detection. We have assayed the overt forms of NTBI that represent the native pool of labile (= redox-active, chelatable and membrane permeant) iron in plasma/serum. We defined it as ‘labile plasma iron' or LPI and analyzed it by the Aferrix FeROS™ test (1) and used it to asses chelation regimens in their ability to maintain patients' plasma at relatively low (basal) LPI levels (<0.4 μ M, ref. 2). Detection of NTBI forms with both low redox activity and poor chelator accessibility (defined as cryptic LPI) can also be done with the FeROS™ test by supplementing samples with an agent (nitrilotriacetate= NTA < 0.5 mM) that in plasma “extracts” iron from native NTBI. Thus whereas LPI measures overtly labile NTBI in native plasma (i.e. LPI), LPIplus detects both overt + cryptic forms, as in classical NTBI assays that involve either mobilization + filtration (3) or in the DCI (directly chelatable iron) assay that measures deferrioxamine chelatable NTBI (4). Aim. To compare SIO parameters in polytransfused thalassemia major patients, chelated and non-chelated, as revealed by measurements of overt and cryptic LPI. Methods. The studies involved: 1. The Hadassah Medical Center (HMC) in Jerusalem, where 15–20 (randomly selected, age 14–35) patients were under regular transfusion/chelation treatment and 2. The European Medical Center in Gaza (EMC), where regularly transfused patients (age 10–22) were only sporadically chelated. NTBI assays were performed on sera prepared from blood, (where applicable taken after >10 hrs drug washout, as described for LPI (1,2) and DCI (4); for LPIplus, the LPI test was conducted in the presence of 0.5 mM NTA. Results. As shown previously (2,4), LPI was detected only in patients with >70% Tf-saturation. In HMC, the mean LPI of n=18 patients rose from 0.51±0.41 μ M to 1.00 ±0.46 μ M in the presence of NTA, matching the DCI level of 0.91±0.7 μ M. The LPI rise was detected in 12/15 (= 80%) of samples with LPI>0.4 μ M (≂p 66% of the entire cohort). Thus, despite chelation, a substantial number of patients had relatively low but significant levels of both overt and cryptic NTBI. Among the 3 patients with no significant LPI or DCI (0.2-0.4 μ M), 2/3 became LPI positive (0.6-0.8 μ M) when tested with NTA. Unexpectedly, in EMC-Gaza, among 20 transfused unchelated patients with serum ferritins > 5000 ng/ml and Tf saturation >100%, 8/20 of them (≂p 40%) had undetectable levels of overt LPI but substantial cryptic NTBI. In the remaining 12/20, the mean overt LPI of 0.69±0.65 μ M rose significantly (p<0.01) to 2.05 ±1.56 μ M when the cryptic component (NTA-extractable) was added. Discussion. Overt and cryptic NTBI components were detected by two modalities of the LPI assay in both regularly chelated and unchelated thalassemia patients, although to different extents and proportions. Compared to chelated patients, those unchelated had significantly higher mean values of both overt and cryptic NTBI components, despite the higher proportion of patients with only cryptic NTBI. On an individual basis, the persistent appearance of either/both LPI component(s) of NTBI could provide a measure of SIO and/or the success of individual chelation regimens. However, remaining to be established is the pathophysiological role of each component of NTBI to SIO, disease progression and treatment success. Supported by ISF and the Canadian Friends of HUJI. 1. Esposito et al. Blood 102:2670-7 (2003); 2. Zanninelli et al. Br. J. Hematol. 147: 744–51(2009); 3. Hider R. Eur J Clin Invest 32:S50–4 (2002); 4. Pootrakul et al. Blood 104: 1504–10 (2004). Disclosures: Cabantchik: Aferrix Ltd: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,008
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,017

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0020,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0030,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,006
Tête enseignante GPT0,256
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations0
Publié2010
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetHemoglobinopathies and Related Disorders→Travaux en français237 207→