MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2556211593 · doi:10.1182/blood.v126.23.1119.1119

Management of Cancer-Associated Upper Extremity Deep Vein Thrombosis with and without Venous Catheters at a Tertiary Care Center

2015· article· en· W2556211593 sur OpenAlexaff
Chatree Chai‐Adisaksopha, Matthew Cheah, Lori Ann Linkins

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2015
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management
Établissements canadiensMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésMedicineCancerInternal medicinePopulationUnivariate analysisSurgeryThrombosisRetrospective cohort studyVenous thrombosisDeep veinBreast cancerLung cancerMultivariate analysis

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Introduction: Data on management of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis(UEDVT) in patients with cancer is limited. Patients in this subgroup were excluded from the large clinical trials that showed the efficacy of extended duration low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) for cancer-associated thrombosis. Furthermore, risk factors for cancer-associated UEDVT in patients who do not have central lines in situ have not been well defined. The goal of our study was to determine the risk factors for cancer-associated UEDVT and to examine the approach to management of these patients in a real-world setting. Methods: We conducted a retrospective review of 200 consecutive patients who were assessed for cancer-associated UEDVT between January 2010 and June 2014 at a tertiary care center. Outcome measures were recurrent VTE, and major and clinically relevant non-major bleeding. Risk factors for recurrent VTE and bleeding were assessed using multivariable analysis. Results: Median duration of follow-up 11 months. Median age was 61.5 years and 55% were male. Cancer subtypes included colorectal (24%), lung (15%), breast (14%), lymphoma (10%), leukemia (5%), esophageal (4%), pancreatic (4%), head & neck (3%), sarcoma (2%), and others 17%. Metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis was present in 37% of patients and 7% of the study population had a previous history of VTE. Of the study population, 138 (69%) had line-associated UEDVT. Risk factors for UEDVT other than presence of a line after univariate analysis were lung cancer, breast cancer and extrinsic compression of vessels by local tumour on diagnostic imaging. The proportion of patients with UEDVT in the absence of a line according to cancer subtype was as follows: lung cancer (83%), pleural mesothelioma (66%), breast cancer (51%) and head & neck cancer (50%). Of these patients, greater than half had evidence of local mass effect on vessels on diagnostic imaging studies. Of the 138 patients with line-associated UEDVT, 20 (15%) had their line removed within one week of diagnosis for reasons unrelated to thrombosis and 107 (84%) had their line removed after completion of at least 3 months of anticoagulant therapy. Recurrent VTE was documented in 35 patients (17.5%), of which 16 (8%) were UEDVT (PE - 10, lower limb DVT-8, other-2). Recurrent VTE while receiving anticoagulants occurred in 23 (65.7%) of all recurrences and in 10 (62.5%)of UEDVT recurrences. Recurrent VTE occurred in 26 patients with a central line and in 9 patients without a central line. All of the patients with recurrent VTE had solid tumours, and 45% had metastatic disease. Multivariant analysis revealed that male gender(OR 2.42, 95% CI;1.1-5.1,p-value=0.02) and active cancer at the end of follow-up (OR 2.47, 95% CI; 0.1-0.9, p-value=0.04) were the only factors significantly associated with recurrent VTE (Figure 1 and 2). None of the following were significant risk factors for recurrence: type of antineoplastic treatment, accompanying PE, white cell count, initial UEDVT while anticoagulated, cancer stage, previous VTE, number of involved venous segments, removal of line during first week after index event or switching to a different anticoagulant. In the group with UEDVT without a venous catheter, the presence of radiologically proven extrinsic compression of vessels was not statistically associated with recurrent VTE. Patients were treated with LMWH for a median duration of 5 months. Six and 8 patients were switched to rivaroxaban and warfarin, respectively. Clinically relevant non-major bleeding occurred in 24 patients (12%), 61% of the bleeds were gastrointestinal and 83% of the bleeds occurred while receiving anticoagulants. On multivariate analysis, bleeding was significantly associated with ongoing anticoagulation (OR 5.6, 95% CI;1.6-19.3, p-value=0.006) and liver metastasis (OR 7.2, 95% CI;0.9-7.2, p-value=0.05). The use of concomitant clopidogrel or aspirin significantly increased the risk of bleeding (OR 6.6 and 5.5, respectively). Conclusions: While the presence of a venous catheter was the primary risk factor for UEDVT for the majority of our cohort, extrinsic compression of vessels by local tumour appeared to be equally important for certain cancer types. Furthermore, our finding that the majority of recurrent events did not occur in the upper limb suggests that UEDVT may be predictive of overall increased thrombogenic risk rather than just a local effect caused by the line. Disclosures Linkins: Bayer: Honoraria, Research Funding; Pfizer: Honoraria.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: Observationnel
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,010

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,003
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0000,001
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,000
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,015
Tête enseignante GPT0,263
Écart entre enseignants0,249 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2015
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetVenous Thromboembolism Diagnosis and Management→Travaux en français237 207→