Hemolytic Reaction Following Intravenous Immunoglobulin (IVIg) for Platelet Alloimmunization During Pregnancy
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 4409 IVIg has become standard therapy for the prevention of severe neonatal thrombocytopenia in women with platelet alloimmunization (Bussel et al. Blood Reviews 2008). A regimen of IVIg 1g/kg twice weekly is increasingly being given for this indication. Although the benefits of this regimen outweigh its risks, clinically significant hemolysis can occur. We report here the case of a 36 year old woman who experienced hemolysis requiring red blood cell transfusions after administration of high dose IVIg for platelet alloimmunization during her second pregnancy. Her first pregnancy was terminated at 24 weeks gestation for a progressive asymmetrical ventriculomegaly first identified at 17 weeks and attributed to in utero intracerebral hemorrhage. The fetal platelet count was 5 ×109/L. Platelet antibody testing in the patient demonstrated the presence of anti-HPA-1a antibodies. The patient's genotype was HPA-1b1b and her partner's, HPA-1a1b. During the subsequent pregnancy, IVIg (Gammagard Liquid®) was started at 9 weeks gestation at a dose of 1g/kg twice weekly. Fetal genotyping was done at 15 weeks and found to be HPA-1a1b. The patient's blood group was AB+. Blood tests prior to each infusion included hemoglobin level, reticulocyte count, bilirubin, LDH, creatinine, urea, glucose and IgG as per our institutional protocol. IVIg was initially well tolerated. Between the fourth and fifth treatments, the patient complained of headache and fatigue. Her physical exam was normal. The laboratory investigation demonstrated hemolytic anemia with a hemoglobin of 74 g/L (Table). Anti-A et anti-B were present in her serum. In retrospect, her reticulocyte count and LDH had started to increase before the previous IVIg infusion (Table). She received 2 packed red cell transfusions as well as prednisone 1mg/kg/d for one week, followed by 0.5 mg/kg/d as planned in the context of her platelet alloimmunization. She improved and her hemoglobin stabilized. Therapy was resumed with a different preparation of IVIg (Gammagard S/D®) 1g/kg twice weekly for the remainder of pregnancy, without untoward effects. Acute hemolysis has been reported with IVIg. Hemolysis in these cases is generally due to passive sensitization with antibodies to the patient's red blood cells found in commercial IVIg. Risk factors are non O blood type, female sex and high dose IVIg (Daw Z et al. Transfusion 2008). Our patient had all three risk factors. Although anti-A and anti-B antibodies are found in all commercial preparations of IVIg, no recurrence was noted in our patient. In patients with alloimmune thrombocytopenia and hemolysis secondary to IVIg, treatment options include changing the commercial preparation of IVIg and giving a lower dose of IVIg with or without prednisone. In conclusion, this case demonstrates an infrequent reaction due to IVIg administration, to which clinicians and patients need to be aware. We now routinely monitor hemoglobin level, reticulocyte count, bilirubin and LDH prior to each IVIg infusion in all patients receiving high dose therapy and if signs of hemolysis appear consider treatment adjustments. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction distillée sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.
Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,000 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».