MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2556504054 · doi:10.1182/blood.v128.22.4144.4144

Five-Year Survival Data from a Pivotal Phase 2 Study of Brentuximab Vedotin in Patients with Relapsed or Refractory Systemic Anaplastic Large Cell Lymphoma

2016· article· en· W2556504054 sur OpenAlexaff
Barbara Pro, Ranjana H. Advani, Pauline Brice, Nancy L. Bartlett, Joseph D. Rosenblatt, Tim Illidge, Jeffrey Matous, Radhakrishnan Ramchandren, Michelle A. Fanale, Joseph M. Connors, Keenan Fenton, Dirk Huebner, Juan Pinelli, Andrei R. Shustov

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2016
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment
Établissements canadiensBC Cancer Agency
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésBrentuximab vedotinMedicineAnaplastic large-cell lymphomaInternal medicineOncologyChemotherapy regimenPeripheral T-cell lymphomaAdverse effectProgression-free survivalLymphomaClinical endpointPhases of clinical researchGastroenterologySurgeryCD30ChemotherapyClinical trialImmunologyT cell

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background Systemic anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL) is a CD30-expressing subtype of peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL). Approximately 40 to 65% of ALCL patients (pts) will develop recurrent disease after frontline treatment, with median overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) after relapse of 5.5 and 3.1 months (mos) (Savage 2008, Mak 2013). We have previously reported results of a pivotal phase 2 study of brentuximab vedotin in pts with relapsed or refractory (R/R) systemic ALCL (NCT00866047). Efficacy was demonstrated with an objective response rate (ORR) per investigator of 86% and a complete response (CR) rate of 66%. Peripheral sensory neuropathy was the most common adverse event (AE), experienced in 41% of pts. Herein, we present the end-of-study results with updated data on response durability and peripheral neuropathy (PN) resolution. Methods Fifty-eight pts with R/R systemic ALCL, ALK-positive or ALK-negative, received 1.8 mg/kg brentuximab vedotin every 3 weeks as a 30-minute outpatient IV infusion for up to 16 cycles. The primary endpoint was the ORR per independent review according to the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma (Cheson 2007). Long-term follow-up to evaluate disease status was assessed per the investigator every 3 mos for 2 years, every 6 mos through Year 5, and annually thereafter. CT scans were required if progression was suspected clinically. Pts who experienced PN were followed for symptom improvement/resolution until approximately 3 years into long-term follow-up. Results The estimated 5-year OS and PFS for all enrolled patients was 60% (95% CI: 47%, 73%) and 39% (95% CI: 25%, 52%), respectively. At study closure, which occurred 5 years after the last patient's end-of-treatment (EOT) visit, the median OS was not reached (95% CI: 21.3, -), and the median PFS was 20 mos (95% CI: 9.4, -). Pts were observed for a median of 71.4 mos (range, 0.8 to 82.4) from first dose. Of the pts who achieved a CR per investigator (38 of 58, 66%), the median OS (endpoints of 95% CI not estimable) and PFS (95% CI: 21.3, -) were not reached. Median OS for pts who achieved partial response per investigator (PR, 12 of 58, 21%) was 11.6 mos (95% CI: 3.1, -). Median duration of objective response was 25.6 mos (95% CI: 11.8, - [range, 0.9 to 79.7+]) and was not reached for CR pts (95% CI: 20.0, - [range, 0.9 to 79.7+]). Of the 58 enrolled pts, 42 (72%) had ALK-negative disease. Median PFS for ALK-negative and ALK-positive ALCL was 20 mos (95% CI: 6.7, -) and 25.5 mos (95% CI: 8.0, -) respectively, with the median OS not reached for each. The estimated 5-year OS was 61% (95% CI: 47%, 76%) for ALK-negative and 56% (95% CI: 32%, 81%) for ALK-positive pts. Of the 38 CR pts, 16 received a consolidative stem cell transplant (SCT, 8 allogeneic, 8 autologous). Median PFS was not reached in these pts who underwent transplant. Median PFS for the CR pts that did not undergo transplant was 39.4 mos (95% CI: 14.3, -). Sixteen pts, with a median observation time of 75.4 mos (range 69 to 82.4), remained in remission at the end of the study without the start of new therapy other than consolidative SCT. Among these pts, 8 received a consolidative SCT, and the remaining 8 pts (14% of all enrolled pts) remained on study and in remission without any additional therapy after single-agent brentuximab vedotin. Thirty-three pts (57% of enrolled pts) experienced PN. Thirty pts (30 of 33, 91%) experienced resolution or improvement, of whom, 22 (67%) reported complete resolution, and 8 (24%) reported some resolution or improvement at last assessment. Of the 11 pts with ongoing neuropathy at last follow-up, 8 pts had Grade 1 severity and 3 pts had Grade 2. Conclusions These end-of-study results demonstrate that among pts with R/R systemic ALCL, the majority of pts have achieved clinically significant durable remissions, and a subset may have been cured with single-agent brentuximab vedotin. Furthermore, associated toxicities are manageable, with high rates of resolution for PN, the most common toxicity associated with brentuximab vedotin. A randomized phase 3 trial is ongoing to evaluate the combination of brentuximab vedotin with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone for frontline treatment of CD30-expressing peripheral T-cell lymphomas, including systemic ALCL (NCT01777152). Overall Survival and Progression-Free Survival Figure. Figure. Disclosures Pro: Takeda: Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Honoraria; Celegene: Honoraria. Brice:Gilead: Honoraria; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Honoraria, Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Bristol Myers-Squibb: Honoraria; Roche: Honoraria. Bartlett:Gilead: Consultancy. Rosenblatt:University of Miami: Employment; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding. Illidge:Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Consultancy, Honoraria; Seattle Genetics: Consultancy, Research Funding. Matous:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Celgene: Consultancy, Speakers Bureau; Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Speakers Bureau. Connors:Bristol Myers Squib: Research Funding; F Hoffmann-La Roche: Research Funding; Millennium Takeda: Research Funding; Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; NanoString Technologies: Research Funding. Fenton:Seattle Genetics: Employment, Equity Ownership. Huebner:Takeda Pharmaceuticals International Co.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pinelli:Seattle Genetics, Inc.: Employment, Equity Ownership. Shustov:Seattle Genetics: Research Funding; Celgene: Consultancy, Honoraria; Novartis: Research Funding; SPECTRUM: Consultancy, Research Funding; BMS: Consultancy, Honoraria.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,004
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Observationnel · Signal consensuel: aucune
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,004
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,020

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0040,002
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,001
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0010,000
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0010,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0020,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,016
Tête enseignante GPT0,257
Écart entre enseignants0,240 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeObservationnel
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations22
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetLymphoma Diagnosis and Treatment→Travaux en français237 207→