MétaCan
Menu
← Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2556577832 · doi:10.1182/blood.v118.21.4042.4042

Combining Oncolytic Vaccinia Virotherapy with Adoptive T Cell Therapy,

2011· article· en· W2556577832 sur OpenAlexaboutno aff
Minhtran Ngo, Jun Ando, Ann M. Leen, Caroline J. Breitbach, Anne Moon, David H. Kirn, John Bell, Cliona M. Rooney

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2011
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
ThématiqueVirus-based gene therapy research
Établissements canadiensnon disponible
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésOncolytic virusBiologyCytotoxic T cellT cellChimeric antigen receptorVirotherapyAntigenCD8ImmunotherapyCancer immunotherapyCancer researchImmunologyVacciniaAdoptive cell transferVirologyImmune systemIn vitro

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Abstract 4042 Background. Immunotherapy with cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs) has proved safe and effective for the treatment of post-transplant viral re-activation and lymphoproliferative diseases. T cells specific for non-viral tumor antigens (TA) have been effective for certain tumors but their efficacy is limited. To improve T cell activity and circumvent tumor evasion T cells have been genetically modified with chimeric antigen receptors (CARs), that consist of extracellular variable domains of antibodies specific for tumor cell surface markers linked via a transmembrane domain to the z chain of the T cell receptor. Although the persistence of CAR-T cell can be improved by the inclusion of signaling domains from various costimulatory molecules, these rarely produce sufficient proliferation and persistence in vivo. An alternative way to promote T cell expansion in vivo is by vaccination. If the T cells carrying the transgenic CAR are naturally specific for a vaccine antigen, then the vaccine could be used in vivo to enhance proliferation and anti-tumor activity. The oncolytic vaccinia virus (OVV) JX-594 produces reduction in tumor bulk, but complete remissions have not been published to date. JX-594 is tumor selective due to its dependency on increased EGFP-Ras pathway and sensitivity to IFN and it potently activates innate immunity by transgenic expression of human GM-CSF and TLR stimulation. We hypothesize that JX-594 could enhance the antitumor efficacy of vaccinia virus (VV)-specific T cells expressing tumor-specific CARs while at the same time reducing tumor mass allowing increased T cell penetration and survival. To identify VV vaccine antigens that induce T cell proliferation in vivo, we selected 6 different VV antigens and asked first if they could activate memory T cells from vaccinated individuals and second if the frequency of these T cells in vivo increased in response to vaccination both in healthy donors and in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who had received OVV treatment. We then determined if VV-specific T cells could be induced to express a CAR specific for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, HER2 that is expressed on a range of solid tumors. Methods. PBMCs were obtained from healthy donors and patients who had received intratumoral JX-594 injections at the University of California in San Diego, USA, and McMaster University Medical Center, Canada. PBMCs were stimulated with overlapping peptide libraries (20aa overlapping by 15aa) spanning the entire protein sequences of the A10L, D8L, H3L, G5R, B22R, and D8L antigens of VV. Three days after stimulation, cells were transduced with retroviral vector encoding HER2.CAR and then expanded as for non-transduced T cells. After 9 days T cells were tested for their dual specificity and function in ELIspot and cytotoxicity assays. Results. We activated VV-specific T cells from 20/21 healthy donors vaccinated from 1 month to over 40 years previously. VV-specific T cell lines recognized a median of 4 of the 6 VV antigens (range 0 to 6). The frequency of VV-specific T cells increased in response to vaccination in healthy seronegative donors and in patients receiving multiple OVV injections. Transduced VV-specific T cells expressed the HER2.CAR in 40 to 50% of cells and CAR(+) T cells secreted g-IFN in response to stimulation with VV peptides in intracellular cytokine assays, validating their dual specificity. HER2.CAR-transduced VV-specific T cells killed both VV peptide pulsed activated T cells and HER2-expressing tumor cells in an HLA-independent manner.In most donors we were not able to detect VV-specific T cells without prior stimulation. However VV-specific T cells from two healthy donors could be detected in blood and expanded 120 and 90 fold, respectively, after one stimulation. In all the other donors, VV-specific T cells expanded to comparable frequencies at the end of the first stimulation, range 0.1% to 5% (with a median of 1.5%) of the final T cell population as measured by ELISpot assay. Conclusions and future plans. We have identified 6 VV antigens that consistently reactivate and expand T cells after vaccination. T cells specific for these antigens will therefore be suitable hosts for tumor-specific CARs that can be reactivated and expanded in vivo after adoptive transfer until the tumor is eliminated. We will test our combined OVV & adoptive T cell strategy in an immunocompetent murine model prior to evaluation in clinical trials. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,000
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Expérimental (laboratoire) · Signal consensuel: Expérimental (laboratoire)
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,001
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,003

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0000,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0010,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,025
Tête enseignante GPT0,259
Écart entre enseignants0,233 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeExpérimental (laboratoire)
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations2
Publié2011
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBlood→Même sujetVirus-based gene therapy research→Travaux en français237 207→