MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2556867900 · doi:10.1182/blood.v124.21.38.38

Thymoglobulin Decreases the Need for Immunosuppression at 12 Months after Myeloablative and Nonmyeloablative Unrelated Donor Transplantation: CBMTG 0801, a Randomized, Controlled Trial

2014· article· en· W2556867900 sur OpenAlexaffabout
Irwin Walker, Kirk R. Schultz, Cynthia L. Toze, Holly Kerr, John J. Moore, David Szwajcer, S.R. Foley, John Kuruvilla, Tony Panzarella, Félix Couture, Jean Roy, Stephen Couban, Gerald M. Devins, Gizelle Popradi, Stephanie J. Lee, Jason Tay, Thomas J. Nevill, Mohamed Elemary, Geneviève Gallagher

Notice bibliographique

RevueBlood · 2014
Typearticle
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueHematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation
Établissements canadiensOttawa HospitalMcGill UniversityDalhousie UniversityUniversity of SaskatchewanLeukemia & Lymphoma Society of CanadaUniversité de MontréalJuravinski HospitalHôpital Maisonneuve-RosemontBC Children's HospitalUniversité LavalUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouver General HospitalPrincess Margaret Cancer CentreUniversity of ManitobaBC Cancer AgencyUniversity of TorontoMcMaster University
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésThymoglobulinMedicineTransplantationRandomized controlled trialImmunosuppressionInternal medicineHazard ratioAlemtuzumabGraft-versus-host diseaseRegimenSurgeryGastroenterologyTacrolimusConfidence interval

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Abstract Background: Randomized trials (RCT) have shown that anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) decreases the incidence and severity of chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) following unrelated donor transplants, but it is not used universally. We conducted a multicenter RCT to test whether the addition of Thymoglobulin® (TG) to both myeloablative (MA) and nonmyeloablative (NMA) preparative regimens results in a decrease in use of immunosuppression for cGVHD, leading to improvements in quality of life but without an increase in mortality, disease relapse or serious infections. Methods: Multicentric (Canada and Australia, 12 centres), open label RCT, in patients having transplantation from unrelated donors for a hematologic malignancy. Inclusion criteria: age 16-70, MA or NMA preparative regimen, bone marrow or peripheral blood graft, fully major histocompatibility complex (MHC) matched (HLA-A, B, C and DRB1) or 1-antigen/allele mismatched donor. Subjects were allocated by minimization procedure to TG or No Thymoglobulin® (NoTG). The TG arm received 0.5, 2.0, 2.0 mg/kg of TG on days -2, -1 and +1 respectively. Analyses were on a modified intention-to-treat basis for patients actually transplanted. The primary end-point was freedom from cGVHD at 12 months from transplantation defined as withdrawal of all systemic immunosuppressive agents (IST) without resumption up to 12 months after transplantation. Secondary end-points included relapse, serious infections, acute and chronic GVHD, overall survival (OS), and quality of life (QoL). QoL measures included Life Happiness Rating, Affect Balance Scale, FACT-BMT, EuroQol 5D, Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression Scale, Chronic GVHD Symptom Scale, and the Illness Intrusiveness Ratings Scale, collected prior to randomization and at 12 months. Treatment group comparisons, adjusted for baseline values, were made using logistic regression, analysis of covariance or the Cox proportional hazards model; in the presence of competing risks the method of Fine and Gray was implemented. Results: Data were locked on July 7, 2014. Two hundred and three (203) subjects consented and were randomized; seven were non-evaluable (6 withdrew before transplant, 3 having relapsed; 1 withdrew consent day 139), leaving 196 subjects for analysis. One subject was later found ineligible but was analyzed. Study populations were balanced for clinical risk factors. Sixty-seven percent (67%) received myeloablative conditioning, and 88% peripheral blood. Eighty-three percent (83%) were 8/8 HLA matched. Overall, freedom from IST at 12 months was twice as high in the TG group 37.4% vs. 16.5%, p=0.0001, even after adjusting for clinical factors: odds ratio 4.25 (95% CI, 1.87 – 9.67); p=0.006 or separately analyzing the MA and NMA groups. Acute GVHD (I-IV) and moderate/severe NIH grades of cGVHD were higher in the NoTG group, while relapse, non-relapse mortality, serious infections and OS were not significantly different. CGVHD (mild/mod/severe) was borderline significant using Fine and Gray (p=0.12; HR=0.65 95% CI (0.38 – 1.11) but the Cox result was significant p=0.01 (HR=0.48 95% CI (0.27 -0.85). Life Happiness was higher and Chronic GVHD Symptoms lower in the TG group as compared to the NoTG group (p=0.014 and 0.017 respectively); no other measure differed significantly. Conclusions: Addition of TG to the conditioning regimen for unrelated donor transplantation results in twice the likelihood of being alive and off immunosuppression at 12 months after transplantation, and is associated with modest improvements in some aspects of QoL. This benefit is seen without an increase in relapse, serious infections or non-relapse mortality. Our data support the use of TG in both MA and NMA preparative regimens before unrelated donor transplantation.TableTG N=97NoTG N=99p-valuePRIMARY ENDPOINTFreedom from IST at 12 mos37.4%16.5%0.001Myeloablative Subanalysis37.9%19.7%0.02Nonmyeloablative Subanalysis36.4%9.7%0.01SECONDARY ENDPOINTSAcute GVHD I-IV58.6%73.2%0.012cGVHD (NIH criteria)22.4%33.4%0.01 (Cox) 0.12 (Fine and Gray)cGVHD (NIH) Mod/Severe4.4%31%0.0001Serious infections38.4%37.1%0.85Relapse10.1%13.4%0.27Non-relapse mortality (12 mo)19.2%24.1%0.45Survival (12 mo)74.7%64.5%0.16Life Happiness Rating (QoL)*7.405.970.014GVHD Symptom Scale (QoL)*14.9520.930.017* Other QoL measures not significant Disclosures Walker: Sanofi: Research Funding. Off Label Use: Thymoglobulin which is the intervention in this randomized trial. Kuruvilla:Sanofi Aventis: Honoraria. Popradi:Sanofi: Honoraria.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction machine sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,003
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Essai randomisé · Signal consensuel: Essai randomisé
GenreSignal candidat: Empirique · Signal consensuel: Empirique
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,005
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,017

Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0030,004
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0010,001
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0040,003
Bibliométrie0,0010,001
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0010,001
Communication savante0,0010,001
Science ouverte0,0010,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0030,002
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0050,001

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,008
Tête enseignante GPT0,237
Écart entre enseignants0,230 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeEssai randomisé
Domainenon disponible
GenreEmpirique

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations16
Publié2014
Routes d'admission2
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revueBloodMême sujetHematopoietic Stem Cell TransplantationTravaux en français237 207