Final Results Of a Phase I Study Of The Anti-CD79b Antibody-Drug Conjugate DCDS4501A In Relapsed Or Refractory (R/R) B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Background DCDS4501A (DCDS), an anti-CD79b monoclonal antibody (Ab), is conjugated to the anti-mitotic agent MMAE. We previously determined a recommended Phase II dose (RP2D) of 2.4 mg/kg every 21 days (q21d), and clinical activity in R/R B-cell NHL at doses ≥ 1.8 mg/kg (Palanca-Wessels et al. ASH 2012). Here we update results from patients (pts) treated at 1.8 mg/kg and from the 2.4 mg/kg expansion cohort. Methods We evaluated ongoing safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK) and activity of DCDS with or without rituximab (RTX) at 375 mg/m2 q21d in pts with R/R DLBCL and indolent (i)NHL. Results Sixty pts were treated with DCDS (6 at 1.8 mg/kg, 45 at 2.4 mg/kg) and DCDS+RTX (9, DCDS at 2.4 mg/kg). Median age 68 yrs (range 20-86); 82% ECOG PS<2; median 4 prior regimens (range 1-14); 97% had prior RTX; 28% had prior autologous stem cell transplant. The DCDS+RTX safety profile did not differ from DCDS monotherapy. Patients received a median of 7 cycles (range 1-20) of DCDS and 10 cycles (range 1-17) of DCDS + RTX; 18 patients continue to receive study treatment. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) included neutropenia (50%), diarrhea (45%), nausea (40%), pyrexia (38%), peripheral neuropathy (25%), peripheral sensory neuropathy (20%), and hypokalemia (20%). Grade ≥ 3 AEs in ≥5% of pts included neutropenia (43%), anemia (13%), thrombocytopenia (7%), hyperglycemia (7%), fatigue (5%) and diarrhea (5%). Grade ≥ 3 infection was reported in 8 (13%) pts. Twenty-two (37%) pts reported a serious AE. TEAEs related to peripheral neuropathy (PN) were reported in 32 (53%) pts with median time to first onset of 63 days. 22/32 pts (69%) had worsening PN with median time to worsening of 49 days. Grade ≥ 3 peripheral neuropathy/peripheral sensory neuropathy/peripheral motor neuropathy was reported in 5 (8%) patients. PN was managed with dose delays and dose reductions resulting in complete reversal in 7 (22%) pts. Treatment discontinuations for AEs were reported in 25 (42%) pts including 17 for PN. Seven pts (12%) had ≥ 1 dose reduction including 3 for PN and 2 for neutropenia. Twenty-six patients (43%) had ≥ 1 dose delay including 14 for neutropenia and 6 for PN. Six deaths were reported within 60 days of last study treatment assessed as unrelated to DCDS. Exposure of Ab-conjugated (ac) MMAE, total Ab, and unconjugated MMAE increased with dose. Maximal concentrations of unconjugated MMAE were >100-fold lower than acMMAE with an average Cycle 1 value of 5-9 ng/mL at the 2.4 mg/kg ADC dose level. Moderate accumulation of acMMAE and total Ab on the q21d dosing schedule was observed with no accumulation of free MMAE. Overall objective responses were observed in 27/51 (53%) DCDS and 7/9 (78%) DCDS+RTX pts. Objective (OR) and complete responses (CR) by histology were as follows: The median PFS for DLBCL patients treated with DCDS or DCDS + RTX was 149 days. The median PFS for iNHL patients treated with DCDS or DCDS + RTX was 241 days. Conclusions DCDS and DCDS+RTX were generally well-tolerated. Neutropenia and PN were the principal toxicities. PN was reversible in some patients with dose delays and reductions. Encouraging anti-tumor activity was observed in heavily pretreated pts with R/R NHL. Updated results from this Phase I study will be presented. An ongoing randomized Phase II study of DCDS+RTX versus a CD22-directed ADC (DCDT2980S) with the same linker-cytotoxic agent in patients with R/R DLBCL and follicular lymphoma will further assess the efficacy of DCDS in the treatment of NHL. Additional studies of DCDS combined with immunochemotherapy are being planned. Disclosures: Palanca-Wessels: Genentech, inc.: Research Funding. Off Label Use: anti-CD79b Antibody-Drug Conjugate in r/r B-cell NHL. Salles:Genentech, inc.: Consultancy. Czuczman:Genentech, inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria. Flinn:Genentech, inc.: Research Funding. Sehn:Genentech, inc.: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding. Tilly:Genentech, inc.: Honoraria. Advani:Genentech, inc.: Research Funding. Casasnovas:Genentech, inc.: Research Funding. Press:Genentech, inc.: Consultancy, Research Funding. Yalamanchili:Genentech, inc.: Employment. Kahn:Genentech, inc.: Employment. Lu:Genentech, inc.: Employment. Chai:Genentech, inc.: Employment. Chu:Genentech, inc.: Employment. Morschhauser:Genentech, inc.: Honoraria, Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».