Meta-Analysis of the Efficacy and Safety of Bortezomib Retreatment in Patients with Multiple Myeloma (MM)
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 1863 Introduction: Bortezomib is approved for the treatment of MM, and bortezomib-based therapies are a cornerstone of care for both first-line and relapsed and/or refractory MM. As bortezomib is administered for a finite course, as opposed to treatment being continued to disease progression, patients may remain sensitive to bortezomib-based therapy at relapse. A number of prospective and retrospective studies in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM have demonstrated the efficacy of subsequent retreatment with bortezomib-containing regimens. We report a systematic literature review and meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of bortezomib-based retreatment in relapsed and/or refractory MM. Methods: Using PubMed and major hematology/oncology conference proceedings, a systematic literature review was performed to identify studies from January 2005 to May 2012 of bortezomib-based therapy in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM. All studies of bortezomib-based retreatment in MM patients with prior exposure to bortezomib were systematically selected. Treatments were classified as bortezomib ± dexamethasone (dex) or bortezomib-based combinations. The proportion of bortezomib-refractory patients was identified for each study where available. Additional prognostic factors, including number of prior therapies, proportion of patients with prior autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), and time since last bortezomib, were extracted and used in weighted stratified analyses of time to progression (TTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS). Random-effect pooled estimates (taking into account heterogeneity across studies) were calculated for overall response rate (ORR; partial response or better) and rates of common adverse events (AEs). A meta-regression was conducted to explore the interactive effects of prognostic factors on ORR. Results: Twenty-three studies (N=1051 patients) were identified. Bortezomib was administered IV in all studies. Retreatment comprised bortezomib ± dex in 5 studies and combination therapy in 18. Bortezomib-refractory patients were included in 11 studies (10–100% of patients), 6 studies included only relapsed patients, and data were not available for 6 studies. Across studies in which data were available, the pooled, weighted average ORR was 39% (95% CI: 31–47) and the pooled, weighted average median TTP, PFS, and OS were 7.5, 5.8, and 16.6 months, respectively. Data from stratified univariate analyses are shown in the table. Outcomes appeared generally consistent across groups while patients with fewer prior therapies (≤4) and relapsed (but not refractory) patients achieved higher ORRs of 43% (95% CI: 31–55) and 57% (95% CI: 45–69), respectively. Random-effects meta-regression analysis controlling for number of prior therapies and % prior ASCT confirmed that, compared to refractory patients, relapsed patients were associated with a higher ORR by 28–41 percentage points. In studies of bortezomib ± dex in patients with a median age >65 years and with a lower % of patients receiving prior ASCT (≤30%), retreatment remained active (pooled average ORR of 51%, median TTP and OS of 8.4 and 19.2 months). The most common grade 3/4 AEs included thrombocytopenia (35%), neutropenia (15%), anemia (14%), pneumonia (10%), and peripheral neuropathy (3%). Conclusions: Based on these findings, retreatment with bortezomib alone or in combination is efficacious and well tolerated in relapsed patients, with an ORR of 57% and median TTP and OS of 8.5 and 19.7 months. In an era of new and emerging treatment options for relapsed and/or refractory MM, these data indicate bortezomib retreatment remains a highly effective therapeutic option in previously treated patients. Disclosures: Knopf: Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy. Duh:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Lafeuille:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Gravel:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Lefebvre:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Research Funding. Niculescu:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Ba-Mancini:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Ma:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Shi:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Employment. Comenzo:Millennium Pharmaceuticals, Inc.: Consultancy, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,017 | 0,034 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,013 | 0,054 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,006 | 0,007 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,003 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».