Preclinical and Clinical Pharmacodynamics of Pan-Pim Inhibition By AZD1208 in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: Assessment of Pim Isoform Dependency for Bad and 4EBP1 Phosphorylation
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Pim kinases have been shown to play a key role as downstream effectors of growth factor signaling in hematological malignancies. We have previously described AZD1208, a novel, orally bioavailable, highly selective pan Pim kinase inhibitor, undergoing clinical testing in AML. Specifically, we had demonstrated the anti-proliferative activity of AZD1208 in models of AML and had shown that AZD1208 treatment of AML cell lines results in the dose dependent reduction of pBAD at serine 112 and p4EBP1 at serine 65 as well as pp70S6K at threonine 389 and pS6 at serine 235/236, associated with global effects on protein translation (Keeton et al. Blood 2014). Since AZD1208 is about 10-15 fold more potent against Pim-1 than Pim-2 in both enzymatic and cellular assays, we sought to assess the dependency of each of these markers on Pim-1 and/or Pim-2 for phosphorylation using a Pim-1/3 selective inhibitor (Pim-1/3) that lacks Pim-2 inhibitory activity. In vitro studies demonstrate that while the modulation of pBAD does not require inhibition of Pim-2, the regulation of 4EBP1 as well as p70S6K and S6 are dependent, at least in part, on Pim-2 activity. As these proteins are canonically regulated by mTORC1, these data are consistent with Pim-2 acting upstream of this complex; perhaps through phosphorylation of TSC2 as reported for multiple myeloma cell lines (Lu et al. Blood 2013). These observations are also supported by in vivo data. Analysis of pBAD and p4EBP1 levels in Molm16 xenografts show that maximal inhibition of pBAD (70-80% inhibition) is achieved at AZD1208 plasma concentration of about 1000 ng/ml, consistent with the estimated cellular IC90 of pBAD inhibition in vitro. However, maximal inhibition of p4EBP1 is achieved at concentrations 3-5 fold higher. This observation is consistent with the differential potency of AZD1208 against Pim-1 and Pim-2, and with a requirement for Pim-2 inhibition for maximal p4EBP1 inhibition in this AML model. pBAD and p4EBP1 were selected as the pharmacodynamic endpoints for evaluating clinical target inhibition in patient samples. Bone marrow and peripheral blood samples were collected pre- and post-dose from relapsed, refractory AML patients enrolled in the AZD1208 Phase I dose escalation. Analysis of pBAD inhibition on day 1 of dosing shows at least 60-70% inhibition across all of the dosing cohorts. With clinical exposures on day 1 approaching 1000 ng/ml at the first dose level and exceeding 1000 ng/ml as the dose increases, the extent of pBAD inhibition seen in patients appears to be consistent with Pim-1 inhibition, as seen in preclinical models. Furthermore, and also similar to our preclinical observations, maximal inhibition of p4EBP1 in patients is achieved only at higher exposures. These data strengthen the hypothesis that BAD phosphorylation is primarily dependent on Pim-1, whereas suppression of Pim-2 activity is required for maximal inhibition of p4EBP1 in AML cells. In summary, Pim inhibition in AML cell line models and in patients treated with AZD1208 results in the inhibition of the downstream targets of Pim signaling, pBAD and p4EBP1. Invitro and in vivo, the inhibition of pBAD is consistent with inhibition of Pim-1 while inhibition of p4EBP1 indicates a requirement for Pim-2 inhibition as well. These observations are validated in patients and provide further evidence for the relevance of these biomarkers as a measure of Pim signaling in AML. Disclosures McEachern: AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. O'Connor:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. DuPont:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Gibbons:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pablo:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Vishwanathan:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. McCoon:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Cortes:AstraZeneca: Research Funding. Neumann:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Keating:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Pease:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership. Brown:AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals: Employment, Patents & Royalties. Barrett:AstraZeneca: Employment, Equity Ownership.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».