The Valproic Acid-Fludarabine Combination Induces a Synergistic Response in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia Via a Mechanism Involving the Lysosomal Protease Cathepsin B.
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Abstract 2892 Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) is the most common haematological malignancy in the western world. Fludarabine, a nucleoside analogue, is commonly used to treat Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia (CLL) in untreated and relapsed CLL. However, patients commonly develop resistance to fludarabine. We hypothesize that the addition of Valproic Acid (VPA), an inhibitor of histone deacetylases (HDACs), can improve fludarabine-based therapy. The VPA-Fludarabine combination induced a synergistic response in human leukemic cells and primary CLL cells. Fludarabine also interacted synergistically with three other HDAC inhibitors, suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid (SAHA), Trichostatin A, and sodium butyrate, while the synergy was not observed with valpromide, the VPA analogue that does not inhibit HDACs. We confirmed that fludarabine treatment activates caspases-8, -9 and caspase-3, and we also show that fludarabine treatment activates caspase-2, an upstream caspase that has been implicated in cell death associated with lysosome membrane permeabilization (LMP). Activation of all four caspases was enhanced by the addition of VPA. Enhanced activation of caspases was associated with down-regulation of two prominent anti-apoptotic proteins, Mcl-1 and XIAP. The down-regulation of Mcl-1 and XIAP was dependent on the lysosomes, as their alkalinization using either chloroquine or NH4Cl partially stabilized both proteins, leading to reduced apoptosis. Chemical inhibition of a specific lysosomal protease, cathepsin B, using CA074-Me, was sufficient to stabilize Mcl-1 and XIAP, reduce caspase activation and apoptosis. Treatment with fludarabine or the VPA-fludarabine combination led to the loss of lysosome integrity, as visualized by fluorescent staining, thus suggesting a leakage of the lysosomal content into the cytosol in response to the drugs. Addition of purified cathepsin B to leukemic cell lysates led to the reduction in protein levels of Mcl-1, XIAP and pro-caspase-2, thus suggesting that the re-localization of cathepsin B into the cytosol is sufficient to drive cell death. VPA treatment enhanced cathepsin B levels in both leukemic cell lines and primary CLL cells. When cathepsin B activity was examined using zRR-AMC, a fluorogenic substrate of cathepsin B, VPA also increased cathepsin B activity, and this activity was abolished by the addition of CA074-Me. In parallel with the in vitro/ex vivo experiments, we had launched a phase II clinical trial at CancerCare Manitoba. Six relapsed CLL patients who had received at least one prior therapy with fludarabine were examined. No responses were seen after 28 days using VPA alone, in line with the in vitro observation of minimal cytotoxicity of VPA at low doses. However, in five patients who continued on VPA with fludarabine, three patients showed a >50% fall in lymphocyte/lymph node size after receiving five cycles of the combination. When the leukemic cells from VPA-treated CLL patients were examined, VPA administration induced increased levels of histone-3 acetylation and cathepsin B in vivo. In summary, a novel mechanism for fludarabine cytotoxicity has been elucidated, where fludarabine induces a loss of lysosomal integrity, leading to cathepsin B-dependent cell death. VPA interacted with fludarabine synergistically, and this synergy was associated with the VPA-induced increase in VPA level and activity. VPA induced increase in histone-3 acetylation and cathepsin B in vivo, and this induction of cathepsin B is likely to be contributing to the clinical response observed in fludarabine-relapsed/refractory CLL patients. Disclosures: Off Label Use: Valproic acid as adjunct therapy in Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia. Johnston:Roche: Honoraria, Membership on an entity's Board of Directors or advisory committees, Research Funding.
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Communication savante | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Science ouverte | 0,000 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,000 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».