A Prospective Multicenter Phase II Study by the Puget Sound Oncology Consortium (PSOC) of Gemcitabine (G), Carboplatin (C), Dexamethasone (D), and Rituximab (R) in Patients with Relapsed/Refractory Lymphoma
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Abstract Combination chemotherapy remains the cornerstone of treatment for most patients with relapsed lymphoma. Unfortunately, the most frequently used salvage regimens such as ICE or DHAP often require inpatient hospitalization for administration and must be used with caution in the elderly, frail, or those with comorbidities. In order to develop a safe, effective, outpatient salvage therapy for the treatment of lymphoma, PSOC prospectively evaluated 2–4 cycles of the novel regimen GCD±R. Eligibility criteria included: age ≥18 yrs, measurable relapsed/refractory disease, no active CNS disease, PS 22, ANC ≥1500/μl, platelets ≥100k/μl, bili/Cr <2x ULN, and no platinum refractory disease. Therapy included G 1000 mg/m2 days(d) 1 and 8, C AUC =5 d 1, D 40 mg daily d 1–4, and R (for patients with CD20+ tumors) 375 mg/m2 d 8 (cycled every 21 days). G-CSF use was at the discretion of the treating physician. Patients without disease progression after 2 cycles could continue up to a total of 4 cycles. Fifty-five patients were enrolled and 51 were evaluable for response (primary endpoint). Baseline characteristics (n =51) included: median age 58 (range 19–79), female 21 (41%), stage III/IV 45 (88%), elevated LDH 17 (33%), median # prior therapies 2 (range 1–8), prior anthracycline 43 (84%), prior platinum 7 (14%), prior high-dose therapy (HDT) and stem cell transplant (SCT) 6 (12%). In addition, 88% of patients with CD20-expressing tumors had received prior R. Histologies included classical Hodgkin lymphoma (HL) = 14, follicular lymphoma (FL) =11, diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) = 8, mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) = 7, marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) = 4, small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) = 3, Peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTCL) = 3, and lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma (LPL) = 1. The overall response rate (ORR) was 67%, with 31% achieving a CR/CRu. In addition, 4 of 7 (57%) patients relapsing after platinum-based chemotherapy, and 4 of 6 (67%) patients relapsing after HDT and SCT achieved a CR/CRu. The table summarizes response rates by histology. Peripheral blood stem cells were successfully mobilized in all 17 (100%) patients in whom this intervention was attempted following GCD±R and G-CSF (median yield of 10.9 × 106 CD34+ cells/kg; range, 5.0–24.1 × 106) with a median time to first apheresis of 14d after initiating chemotherapy (range, 11–19d). Despite 43% and 67% of patients developing grade 4 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia (CTCAE 3.0), rates of ≥grade 3 febrile neutropenia (8%), infection (16%), and bleeding (8%) were acceptable. Other most common non-hematologic toxicities of ≥grade 3 included laboratory (22%) and cardiovascular (16%). There were no treatment-related deaths. With a median follow up of 12 months, 35 (68%) patients are alive and 22 (43%) are progression-free. In this prospective multicenter trial we demonstrate that GCD(R) is a safe and effective outpatient regimen for the treatment of relapsed lymphoma, with particular efficacy in HL, FL, MCL, and MZL (all >70% ORR) and can successfully mobilize PBSC. These results provide an additional, outpatient-based therapeutic option for such patients and set the stage for future randomized trials directly comparing salvage regimens for lymphoma. Table: Response rates by histology Histology n Overall Response (%) CR/CRu (%) HL 14 12 (86) 7 (50) FL 11 9 (82) 4 (36) DLBCL 8 5 (63) 1 (13) MCL 7 5 (71) 3 (43) MZL 4 3 (75) 1 (25) PTCL 3 0 (0) 0 (0) SLL 3 0 (0) 0(0) LPL 1 0 (0) 0(0) Total 51 34 (67) 16 (31)
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,004 | 0,002 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Science ouverte | 0,001 | 0,000 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,001 | 0,002 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,002 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».