Long-Term Safety of Hydroxyurea in Sickle Cell Anemia and Other Benign Diseases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Notice bibliographique
Résumé
Background Hydroxyurea (HU) is an oral chemotherapeutic agent that has been used for the treatment of sickle cell anemia (SCA) and many other conditions. Although the efficacy of HU has been established in SCA, there is ambiguity regarding the long-term adverse events of this treatment. As significant risk such as secondary malignancies or myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) have been linked to this drug but occur in small numbers across the various indications, we planned to pool the results from HU studies used in many conditions (excluding malignant and premalignant diseases) to obtain much wanted risk estimates. Objectives To evaluate the long-term safety (carcinogenicity) of HU therapy in people with SCA or any benign diseases (excluding malignant and premalignant diseases) of any age. Search strategy We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), ongoing trials registers, and major preceding conferences. Hand searches were also conducted using reference lists from primary studies. All searches were updated to May 25 2014. Selection criteria Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies (sample size ≥ 20 and mean/median follow up ≥ 2 years) assessing the toxicity of HU for the treatment of patients with any benign diseases were included. Data collection and analysis Two authors acted as reviewers and independently completed the search process, selected the studies, assessed study quality, and extracted data from the included studies. Authors of included studies were contacted if further information was required. Since the majority of the included studies were single-arm design with no control groups, the effect size was estimated as a proportion (events over patient-years on HU) and reported as overall cancer risk (OCR) for the included studies. All data was analyzed using comprehensive meta-analysis (CMA), version 2.0. Main results A total of 37 studies (3 RCTs and 34 observational studies) involving 3278 patients were included. We identified four benign diseases where HU has been used ≥ 2 years and met the inclusion criteria. These include SCA (26 studies), β-thalassemia (9 studies), cyanotic congenital heart diseases (one study), and renal stones (one study). HU was not associated with increased risk of cancers in the treated group with OCR of 0.2% (95% CI, 0.0-0.3%). Further to that, 12 studies or extension studies with ≥ 5 year follow up on HU showed stable result of 0.2%. This weighted effect size represent cancer incidence rate of 2 per 1000 which is not higher than the most recent published cancer incidence rate for all African-American or Whites, US 2005-2009 period. Acknowledging the differences between the two rates and they are not meant to be direct comparison, a useful representation can be extracted from them. Overall, there were 7 cases of malignancy/MDS were identified post relatively long-term use (≥ 2years) of HU in 3278 patients. In the narrative review, we identified another 13 cases of malignancies post HU use in hemoglobinopathy as described by different case reports and studies that did not meet our inclusion criteria with majority have been leukemia. The majority of the included studies had several limitations, such as small sample size, lack of comparison group, under-reporting of data and methods, and the majority having been observational studies. Authors’ conclusion The use of HU in treating patients with hemoglobinopathies does not appear to be associated with increase risk of secondary malignancies nor MDS despite being used for relatively long-term courses. However, ongoing long-term studies as well as updated national and international registries and other types of large database are highly needed to further consolidate this finding. Disclosures Off Label Use: Hydroxyurea for management of β-Thalassemia, Cyanotic congenital heart diseases, Renal stones, or Children with sickle cell anemia..
Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.
Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier
Prédiction machine sur la base complète
Imitation des enseignantsNi prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Le volet Gemma est une étiquette directe du modèle pour chaque travail de la base, lue sur la notice réduite au titre. Le volet Codex est un classifieur appris des 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et calibré sur les taux pondérés de l'échantillon; les champs sans appui suffisant ne portent aucun appel Codex. Le mode candidate est l'union des deux volets; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont pas des étiquettes humaines.
Scores du classifieur distillé par catégorie (deux têtes)
| Catégorie | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Métarecherche | 0,013 | 0,037 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict) | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Méta-épidémiologie (sens large) | 0,018 | 0,026 |
| Bibliométrie | 0,008 | 0,009 |
| Études des sciences et des technologies | 0,001 | 0,001 |
| Communication savante | 0,003 | 0,002 |
| Science ouverte | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Intégrité de la recherche | 0,002 | 0,001 |
| Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger) | 0,005 | 0,000 |
Scores machine (provisoires)
Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.
Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découleClassification
machine, non validéePrédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule source (Gemma direct ou Codex distillé), pas un consensus.
Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».