MétaCan
Menu
Retour à la cohorte
Enregistrement W2558379954 · doi:10.1542/pir.2016-0122

Norovirus and Other Human Calicivirus Infections

2016· editorial· en· W2558379954 sur OpenAlexaff
Jacob J. Rosenberg

Notice bibliographique

RevuePediatrics in Review · 2016
Typeeditorial
Langueen
DomaineMedicine
ThématiqueViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiology
Établissements canadiensSciex (Canada)
Organismes subventionnairesnon disponible
Mots-clésSapovirusNorovirusCaliciviridaeOutbreakNorwalk virusVirologyCalicivirusRotavirusDiseaseMedicineVirusAstrovirus

Résumé

récupéré en direct d'OpenAlex

Caliciviridae is a family of viruses that is divided into at least 5 genera, with noroviruses and sapoviruses being the 2 that are often termed human caliciviruses. The cause of a condition first described in 1929 as the “winter vomiting disease” because of its predilection for wintertime outbreaks, norovirus was initially named in 1968 as the Norwalk virus because it was discovered in Norwalk, OH. Noroviruses are single-stranded RNA viruses, with many genotypes capable of causing human disease. The primary genotypes responsible for disease in humans are G-I (∼15% of cases), G-II (∼85% of cases), and G-IV (<1% of cases). The viral capsid is composed of 2 primary proteins: VP1 and VP2. The P-domain can undergo antigenic drift and shift, thereby allowing immune evasion and giving the virus potential for pandemic spread.In the United States, noroviruses are responsible for more than 50,000 hospitalizations each year and 500 to 800 deaths. With more than 1 million doctor visits annually, norovirus is now the #1 cause of pediatric gastroenteritis since the introduction of the rotavirus vaccines. Sapovirus infections have also been recognized in the past as a substantial cause of sporadic cases of acute pediatric gastroenteritis and more recently of outbreaks of diarrheal illness. Worldwide, norovirus is responsible for 685 million episodes of gastroenteritis annually, with 200 million of these cases among children younger than age 5 years. These infections lead to the deaths of an estimated 50,000 children every year, nearly all of which occur in developing countries. Periodically a pandemic strain arises and the number of deaths more than doubles. Just how often norovirus is the cause of travelers’ diarrhea is not known, but some studies indicate the incidence may be as high as 65% of cases.Shedding of norovirus and sapovirus can be asymptomatic, most often among children, which makes closed populations (schools, child care centers, long-term care facilities, and cruise ships) particularly susceptible to the development of outbreaks. Viral transmission is most commonly fecal-oral, either directly from contaminated food or by touching surfaces harboring the virus and then from hand to mouth. Currently, in fact, norovirus is the #1 cause of foodborne illnesses in the United States. Contagious vomitus has also been the source of individual infections and several outbreaks.Several factors contribute to the ease of norovirus spread: it has a very low infectious dose of fewer than 100 viral particles, it can live a long time on contaminated surfaces, large numbers of viral particles are excreted with infection, and shedding can persist for weeks after symptoms resolve.Infections occur throughout the year but have an increased incidence during the cooler months. The incubation period is 12 to 48 hours, after which symptomatic patients may develop the abrupt onset of nausea and vomiting with watery diarrhea, abdominal cramps, and loss of appetite. Most typically, symptoms last for 1 to 3 days, but the very young and the elderly as well as patients weakened by underlying illness may have more prolonged illness. Beyond the gastrointestinal tract, patients may experience fever, muscle aches, and headache. Rarely, norovirus infection has been associated with hemolytic-uremic syndrome, elevations in liver function tests, and influenzalike symptoms. Some studies have suggested a possible link between norovirus infection and the development of inflammatory bowel disease.Several diagnostic tests can identify norovirus: a multiplex nucleic acid-based assay, an enzyme immunoassay kit, and real-time reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction. These tests, however, are not widely available in clinical laboratories; they are primarily used for public health reasons rather than for the care of individual patients for whom symptoms are usually of short duration and self-resolving with supportive care.Maintenance of hydration, either orally or intravenously, is the mainstay of treatment. Vaccines against norovirus are in the early stages of development, but for now at least, meticulous handwashing with soap and running water remains the key to prevention and is more effective than the use of alcohol gels. Within the hospital setting, regular control measures as well as contact precautions should be taken for patients admitted with norovirus infection.COMMENT: In the age of probiotics and prebiotics, monoclonal antibodies, fifth-generation antimicrobials, stem cell transplants, even fecal transplants, how ironic that our best defense against norovirus is running water and soap! Is it comic or tragic that our best tools against malaria (and, for that matter, Zika) remain bug spray and mosquito netting? Yes, to paraphrase Frost, the world is lovely, dark and deep, but we have promises to keep, and miles to go before we sleep.

Récupéré en direct depuis OpenAlex et désinversé. Les résumés ne sont pas conservés dans cette base de données : les index inversés représentent 8,6 Go des 9,3 Go de texte de la base, et le serveur dispose de 13 Go libres.

Comment cette classification a été obtenuedéplier

Prédiction distillée sur la base complète

Imitation des enseignants

Ni prévalence calibrée, ni vérité terrain. Validation humaine à venir. Apprise à partir de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Codex et de 10 348 étiquettes directes de Gemma. Le mode candidate est l'union des têtes enseignantes seuillées; le consensus est leur intersection. Ces sorties portent le statut machine_predicted_unvalidated et ne sont ni des étiquettes humaines ni des étiquettes directes de modèles de pointe.

score de la tête « metaresearch » (Codex)0,001
score de la tête « metaresearch » (Gemma)0,007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aStatut de validation: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Catégories candidatesaucune
Catégories consensuellesaucune
DomaineSignal candidat: aucune · Signal consensuel: aucune
Devis d'étudeSignal candidat: Sans objet · Signal consensuel: Sans objet
GenreSignal candidat: Synthèse · Signal consensuel: Synthèse
Score de désaccord entre enseignants0,024
Score d'incertitude au seuil0,849

Scores Codex et Gemma par catégorie

CatégorieCodexGemma
Métarecherche0,0010,007
Méta-épidémiologie (sens strict)0,0000,000
Méta-épidémiologie (sens large)0,0010,000
Bibliométrie0,0000,000
Études des sciences et des technologies0,0000,000
Communication savante0,0000,000
Science ouverte0,0000,000
Intégrité de la recherche0,0000,001
Charge utile insuffisante (le modèle a refusé de juger)0,0000,000

Scores machine (provisoires)

Les deux têtes enseignantes du modèle étudiant, lues sur ce travail. Un score ordonne la base pour la relecture; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie, et le statut de validation accompagne chaque rangée tel quel.

Scores de référence d'un modèle non mature (critères de maturité non atteints, 7 itérations). Un score ordonne; il n'affirme jamais une catégorie.

Tête enseignante Opus0,035
Tête enseignante GPT0,416
Écart entre enseignants0,381 · la distance entre les deux têtes enseignantes sur ce seul travail
Statut de validationscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · tel quel depuis la passe de notation : score_only signifie que le nombre peut ordonner les travaux, et qu'aucune étiquette de catégorie n'en découle

Classification

machine, non validée

Prédiction automatique; un appel candidat d’une seule tête enseignante, pas un consensus.

Les modèles n’ont appliqué aucune catégorie : rien dans la taxonomie ne correspondait à ce travail.
Devis d'étudeSans objet
Domainenon disponible
GenreSynthèse

Le détail, modèle par modèle et score par score, se trouve en fin de page sous « Comment cette classification a été obtenue ».

En bref

Citations1
Publié2016
Routes d'admission1
Résumé présentoui

Explorer davantage

Même revuePediatrics in ReviewMême sujetViral gastroenteritis research and epidemiologyTravaux en français237 207